linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
To: Kristian Klausen <kristian@klausen.dk>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
	Rajneesh Bhardwaj <rajneesh.bhardwaj@linux.intel.com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@dell.com>,
	Kai-Heng Feng <kai.heng.feng@canonical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] PM / ACPI: sleep: Additional changes related to suspend-to-idle
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2019 09:30:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0gc82P_ZzCmgMxe1jNuqe0F3wzKUW=b5=CaWL2kmrguBg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5924084c-cd89-c213-5926-9f303dcd3b39@klausen.dk>

On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 12:47 AM Kristian Klausen <kristian@klausen.dk> wrote:
>
> On 20.08.2019 23.38, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tuesday, August 20, 2019 3:29:48 PM CEST Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 3:10 PM Kristian Klausen <kristian@klausen.dk> wrote:
> >>> On 19.08.2019 22.41, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >>>> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 5:47 PM Kristian Klausen <kristian@klausen.dk> wrote:
> >>>>> On 19.08.2019 11.05, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >>>>>> On Monday, August 19, 2019 9:59:02 AM CEST Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 10:26 PM Kristian Klausen <kristian@klausen.dk> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> On 02.08.2019 12.33, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> Hi All,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On top of the "Simplify the suspend-to-idle control flow" patch series
> >>>>>>>>>>> posted previously:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/71085220.z6FKkvYQPX@kreacher/
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> sanitize the suspend-to-idle flow even further.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> First off, decouple EC wakeup from the LPS0 _DSM processing (patch 1).
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Next, reorder the code to invoke LPS0 _DSM Functions 5 and 6 in the
> >>>>>>>>>>> specification-compliant order with respect to suspending and resuming
> >>>>>>>>>>> devices (patch 2).
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Finally, rearrange lps0_device_attach() (patch 3) and add a command line
> >>>>>>>>>>> switch to prevent the LPS0 _DSM from being used.
> >>>>>>>>>> The v2 is because I found a (minor) bug in patch 1, decided to use a module
> >>>>>>>>>> parameter instead of a kernel command line option in patch 4.  Also, there
> >>>>>>>>>> are 4 new patches:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Patch 5: Switch the EC over to polling during "noirq" suspend and back
> >>>>>>>>>> during "noirq" resume.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Patch 6: Eliminate acpi_sleep_no_ec_events().
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Patch 7: Consolidate some EC code depending on PM_SLEEP.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Patch 8: Add EC GPE dispatching debug message.
> >>>>>>>>> The v3 is just a rearranged v2 so as to move the post sensitive patch (previous patch 2)
> >>>>>>>>> to the end of the series.   [After applying the full series the code is the same as before.]
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> For easier testing, the series (along with some previous patches depended on by it)
> >>>>>>>>> is available in the pm-s2idle-testing branch of the linux-pm.git tree at kernel.org:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git/log/?h=pm-s2idle-testing
> >>>>>>>> It was just testing this patch series(461fc1caed55), to see if it would
> >>>>>>>> fix my charging issue
> >>>>>>>> (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=201307), which it didn't.
> >>>>>>> It is unlikely to help in that case.
> >>>>> Do you have any idea what the issue could be?
> >>>> Basically, there are two possibilities: either the OS is expected to
> >>>> handle the AC/battery switching events, or the platform firmware
> >>>> should take care of them.  In the former case, the EC should generate
> >>>> events to be handled by the OS and in the latter one there needs to be
> >>>> a way to let the platform firmware that it needs to take care of those
> >>>> events going forward.
> >>>>
> >>>> In either case there may be a platform-specific action to be carried
> >>>> out during suspend and resume to set this up as expected which may be
> >>>> missing.
> >>> Thanks for the explanation. I don't think I have the expertise to solve
> >>> the issue, but at least now I'm one step closer.
> >>>>>>>> I did however notice that my laptop (ASUS Zenbook UX430UNR/i7-8550U)
> >>>>>>>> won't wake when opening the lid or pressing a key, the only way to wake
> >>>>>>>> the laptop is pressing the power button.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I also tested mainline (5.3.0-rc4 b7e7c85dc7b0) and 5.2.8 and the laptop
> >>>>>>>> wakes without issue when the lid is opened or a key is presed.
> >>>>>>>>> Please refer to the changelogs for details.
> >>>>>>> Thanks for your report.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I seem to see a similar issue with respect to the lid on one of my
> >>>>>>> test machines, looking into it right now.
> >>>>>> Well, my lid issue seems to be unrelated as it doesn't result from any patches in the
> >>>>>> series in question.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> First off, please clone 5.3-rc5 from kernel.org and double check if the issue is not
> >>>>>> present in that one.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> If that's not the case, merge the pm-s2idle-rework branch from my tree on top of it
> >>>>>> and retest.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> If you still see the issue then, apply the appended patch (on top of the pm-s2idle-reqork
> >>>>>> branch ) and, after starting the kernel, do
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> # echo 1 > /sys/power/pm_debug_messages
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> suspend the system and try to wake it up through all of the ways that stopped working.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Then, wake it up with the power button, save the output of dmesg and send it to me.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks!
> >>>>> With 5.3-rc5 the laptops wakes up without any issue when pressing a key
> >>>>> or opening the lid.
> >>>>> With v5.3-rc5+pm-s2idle-testing I can only wake the laptop by pressing
> >>>>> the power button.
> >>>> OK, thanks for verifying.
> >>>>
> >>>> So it is unclear to me how the series can cause an issue like that to appear.
> >>>>
> >>>>> dmesg with pm_debug_messages=1 and your patch:
> >>>>> [   55.646109] PM: suspend entry (s2idle)
> >>>>> [   55.698559] Filesystems sync: 0.052 seconds
> >>>>> [   55.698561] PM: Preparing system for sleep (s2idle)
> >>>>> [   55.700661] Freezing user space processes ... (elapsed 0.210 seconds)
> >>>>> done.
> >>>>> [   55.911494] OOM killer disabled.
> >>>>> [   55.911495] Freezing remaining freezable tasks ... (elapsed 0.001
> >>>>> seconds) done.
> >>>>> [   55.913192] PM: Suspending system (s2idle)
> >>>>> [   55.913195] printk: Suspending console(s) (use no_console_suspend to
> >>>>> debug)
> >>>>> [   55.914778] [drm] CT: disabled
> >>>>> [   55.916057] wlan0: deauthenticating from 64:70:02:a5:fd:02 by local
> >>>>> choice (Reason: 3=DEAUTH_LEAVING)
> >>>>> [   56.045634] sd 2:0:0:0: [sda] Synchronizing SCSI cache
> >>>>> [   56.046650] sd 2:0:0:0: [sda] Stopping disk
> >>>>> [   56.287622] PM: suspend of devices complete after 371.285 msecs
> >>>>> [   56.287627] PM: start suspend of devices complete after 373.684 msecs
> >>>>> [   56.307155] PM: late suspend of devices complete after 19.477 msecs
> >>>>> [   56.312479] ACPI: EC: interrupt blocked
> >>>>> [   56.352761] PM: noirq suspend of devices complete after 45.205 msecs
> >>>>> [   56.352770] ACPI: \_PR_.PR00: LPI: Device not power manageable
> >>>>> [   56.352774] ACPI: \_PR_.PR01: LPI: Device not power manageable
> >>>>> [   56.352776] ACPI: \_PR_.PR02: LPI: Device not power manageable
> >>>>> [   56.352779] ACPI: \_PR_.PR03: LPI: Device not power manageable
> >>>>> [   56.352782] ACPI: \_PR_.PR04: LPI: Device not power manageable
> >>>>> [   56.352785] ACPI: \_PR_.PR05: LPI: Device not power manageable
> >>>>> [   56.352788] ACPI: \_PR_.PR06: LPI: Device not power manageable
> >>>>> [   56.352790] ACPI: \_PR_.PR07: LPI: Device not power manageable
> >>>>> [   56.352793] ACPI: \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0: LPI: Device not power manageable
> >>>>> [   56.352800] ACPI: \_SB_.PCI0.RP06.PXSX: LPI: Device not power manageable
> >>>>> [   56.357057] PM: suspend-to-idle
> >>>>> [   69.338656] PM: Timekeeping suspended for 12.178 seconds
> >>>>> [   69.338701] PM: irq_pm_check_wakeup: IRQ 9
> >>>>> [   69.338704] PM: IRQ wakeup: IRQ 9
> >>>> This clearly is the power button event causing the system to wake up.
> >>>> The other actions, whatever they were, didn't cause any interrupts to
> >>>> be triggered.
> >>>>
> >>>> I suspect that the issue is related to the EC, so please try to revert commit
> >>>>
> >>>> fcd0a04267ac ACPI: PM: s2idle: Switch EC over to polling during "noirq" suspend
> >>>>
> >>>> and see if that makes any difference (should revert cleanly).
> >>>>
> >>>> If that doesn't make any difference, please also try to revert commits
> >>>> (on top of the above revert)
> >>>>
> >>>> 11f26633cccb PM: suspend: Fix platform_suspend_prepare_noirq()
> >>>> ac9eafbe930a ACPI: PM: s2idle: Execute LPS0 _DSM functions with
> >>>> suspended devices
> >>>>
> >>>> (in this order) and retest.
> >>> Reverting the following commits, didn't fix the issue:
> >>> fcd0a04267ac ACPI: PM: s2idle: Switch EC over to polling during "noirq"
> >>> suspend
> >>> 6e86633a791f ACPI: PM: s2idle: Eliminate acpi_sleep_no_ec_events()
> >>> 11f26633cccb PM: suspend: Fix platform_suspend_prepare_noirq()
> >>> ac9eafbe930a ACPI: PM: s2idle: Execute LPS0 _DSM functions with
> >>> suspended devices
> >>>
> >>> I didn't bother reverting all the commits, so I did a checkout of:
> >>> b605c44c30b5 PM: sleep: Drop dpm_noirq_begin() and dpm_noirq_end()
> >>> and everything works, then I did a checkout of:
> >>> 10a08fd65ec1 ACPI: PM: Set up EC GPE for system wakeup from drivers that
> >>> need it
> >>> and the laptop won't wake when opening the lid or pressing a key.
> >>>
> >>> So 10a08fd65ec1 must be the culprit.
> >> Good job, thanks!
> >>
> >> The assumption in there was that the EC GPE would not need to be set
> >> up for wakeup unless it is needed either by the intel-hid or by the
> >> intel-vbtn driver.  On your platform it needs to be set up for wakeup
> >> even though neither of these drivers is in use.
> >>
> >> Let me cut a fix patch and get back to you when it's ready.
> > The appended patch should help, so please apply it (on top of
> > v5.3-rc5+pm-s2idle-testing) and test.
> It works, pressing a key or opening the lid the laptop wakes instantly.
> Thanks!

Thanks for the confirmation!

I'll resend it with a changelog and tags, then.

      reply	other threads:[~2019-08-21  7:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-02 10:33 Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-02 10:38 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] ACPI: PM: Set up EC GPE for system wakeup from drivers that need it Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-02 10:38 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] ACPI: PM: s2idle: Rearrange lps0_device_attach() Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-02 10:38 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] ACPI: PM: s2idle: Add acpi.sleep_no_lps0 module parameter Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-02 10:40 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] ACPI: PM: s2idle: Switch EC over to polling during "noirq" suspend Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-02 10:41 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] ACPI: PM: s2idle: Eliminate acpi_sleep_no_ec_events() Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-02 10:43 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] ACPI: EC: PM: Consolidate some code depending on PM_SLEEP Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-02 10:44 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] ACPI: EC: PM: Make acpi_ec_dispatch_gpe() print debug message Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-02 10:45 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] ACPI: PM: s2idle: Execute LPS0 _DSM functions with suspended devices Rafael J. Wysocki
     [not found]   ` <CGME20190809120052eucas1p11b56806662ef4f4efb82a152ad651481@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2019-08-09 12:00     ` Marek Szyprowski
2019-08-09 12:15       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-10 11:24       ` [PATCH] PM: suspend: Fix platform_suspend_prepare_noirq() Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-05 16:25 ` [PATCH v3 0/8] PM / ACPI: sleep: Additional changes related to suspend-to-idle Kai-Heng Feng
2019-08-12 13:55 ` Bhardwaj, Rajneesh
2019-08-12 21:32   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-16 20:20 ` Kristian Klausen
2019-08-19  7:59   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-19  9:05     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-19 15:45       ` Kristian Klausen
2019-08-19 20:41         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-20 13:10           ` Kristian Klausen
2019-08-20 13:29             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-20 21:38               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-08-20 22:47                 ` Kristian Klausen
2019-08-21  7:30                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAJZ5v0gc82P_ZzCmgMxe1jNuqe0F3wzKUW=b5=CaWL2kmrguBg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kai.heng.feng@canonical.com \
    --cc=kristian@klausen.dk \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mario.limonciello@dell.com \
    --cc=rajneesh.bhardwaj@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] PM / ACPI: sleep: Additional changes related to suspend-to-idle' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).