From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: Tom Burkart <tom@aussec.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/4] dt-bindings: pps: descriptor-based gpio, capture-clear addition
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 13:39:12 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAL_Jsq+_Fb8mRDf_g=qDVsw-KPnrdZunLksYrgBFvhehzVNX+g@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181118113502.55634v85ybgkt586@www.aussec.com>
On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 6:35 PM tom burkart <tom@aussec.com> wrote:
>
> Quoting Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>:
>
> > On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 4:35 AM tom burkart <tom@aussec.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Quoting Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>:
> >>
> >> > On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 11:54:29PM +1100, Tom Burkart wrote:
> >> >> This patch changes the devicetree bindings for the pps-gpio driver
> >> >> from the integer based ABI to the descriptor based ABI.
> >> > ? That has nothing to do with DT.
> >>
> >> I believe it does, as the change in ABI forces a rename in the DT
> >> naming convention.
> >> This is due to the descriptor based ABI appending "-gpio" or "-gpios" (see
> >> Documentation/gpio/base.txt.)
> >> Admittedly, I may have called it by the wrong name due to ignorance,
> >> my apologies.
> >
> > If what you say is correct, then you can't change this driver. You'll
> > break compatibility with any existing DT.
> >
> > Changing the binding reasoning should purely be that this is the
> > preferred form. Bindings must be independent from changing kernel
> > APIs.
>
> See comments from Philip Zabel. I misread the documentation and this
> has now been corrected in v8 of the patch. I hope that eliminates all
> comments made above.
>
> >> >> It also adds
> >> >> documentation for the device tree capture-clear option. The legacy
> >> >> device tree entry for the GPIO pin is supported.
> >> >>
> >> >> Signed-off-by: Tom Burkart <tom@aussec.com>
> >> >> ---
> >> >> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pps/pps-gpio.txt | 8 ++++++--
> >> >> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >> >>
> >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pps/pps-gpio.txt
> >> >> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pps/pps-gpio.txt
> >> >> index 3683874832ae..6c9fc0998d94 100644
> >> >> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pps/pps-gpio.txt
> >> >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pps/pps-gpio.txt
> >> >> @@ -5,19 +5,23 @@ a GPIO pin.
> >> >>
> >> >> Required properties:
> >> >> - compatible: should be "pps-gpio"
> >> >> -- gpios: one PPS GPIO in the format described by ../gpio/gpio.txt
> >> >> +- pps-gpios: one PPS GPIO in the format described by ../gpio/gpio.txt
> >> >> +Alternatively (DEPRECATED), instead of pps-gpios above, it may have:
> >> >> +- gpios: one PPS GPIO as above
> >> >>
> >> >> Optional properties:
> >> >> - assert-falling-edge: when present, assert is indicated by a
> >> falling edge
> >> >> (instead of by a rising edge)
> >> >> +- capture-clear: when present, also capture the PPS clear event
> >> >
> >> > Is this a h/w thing? or driver configuration?
> >>
> >> Driver configuration. Most of the code was present in the driver, yet
> >> it was not documented, or usable due to a two line (code) omission
> >> (the value was not being fetched from DT).
> >
> > So what determines how you want to configure this? If the user will
> > want to change it, then it should be a sysfs attr and exposed to
> > userspace. If it depends on h/w config for a board then it can be in
> > DT.
>
> Sorry, I misled you somewhat. If the PPS pulse active transition from
> the hardware is on the falling edge, this flag is required to get the
> OS to use that as the active transition. This would not change at the
> user's whim but rather it is dependent on connected hardware.
This description sounds more like 'assert-falling-edge' than 'capture-clear'.
I'm still not clear on what 'capture-clear' is.
Rob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-11-26 19:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-11-14 12:54 [PATCH v7 0/4] PPS: pps-gpio PPS ECHO implementation Tom Burkart
2018-11-14 12:54 ` [PATCH v7 1/4] dt-bindings: pps: descriptor-based gpio, capture-clear addition Tom Burkart
2018-11-14 12:54 ` [PATCH v7 2/4] " Tom Burkart
2018-11-14 12:54 ` [PATCH 3/4] dt-bindings: pps: pps-gpio PPS ECHO implementation Tom Burkart
2018-11-14 12:54 ` [PATCH v7 4/4] pps: pps-gpio pps-echo implementation Tom Burkart
2018-11-16 22:49 ` [PATCH v7 1/4] dt-bindings: pps: descriptor-based gpio, capture-clear addition Rob Herring
2018-11-17 10:35 ` tom burkart
2018-11-17 14:22 ` Rob Herring
2018-11-18 0:35 ` tom burkart
2018-11-26 19:39 ` Rob Herring [this message]
2018-11-27 3:57 ` tom burkart
2018-11-28 17:13 ` Rob Herring
2018-11-29 0:29 ` tom burkart
2018-11-29 2:05 ` tom burkart
2018-11-29 18:00 ` Rob Herring
2018-12-01 22:24 ` tom burkart
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAL_Jsq+_Fb8mRDf_g=qDVsw-KPnrdZunLksYrgBFvhehzVNX+g@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tom@aussec.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).