linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>
To: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG nohz]: wrong user and system time accounting
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 20:27:48 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANRm+CxxZzHSZhSO-EJAohz5Q7-Fqwo-e_b15CVjJy9nYEydCA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170329221400.2b1e8d77@redhat.com>

2017-03-30 10:14 GMT+08:00 Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>:
> On Thu, 30 Mar 2017 06:46:30 +0800
> Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> > So! Now we need to find a proper fix :o)
>> >
>> > Hmm, how bad would it be to revert to sched_clock() instead of jiffies in vtime_delta()?
>> > We could use nanosecond granularity to check deltas but only perform an actual cputime update
>> > when that delta >= TICK_NSEC. That should keep the load ok.
>>
>> Yeah, I mentioned something similar before.
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/3/26/138 However, Rik's commit optimized
>> syscalls by not utilize sched_clock(), so if we should distinguish
>> between syscalls/exceptions and irqs?
>
> Why not use ktime_get()?

I believe ktime_get() is more heavy than local_clock() when sched
clock is stable. So we can cooperate to improve
https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/3/30/456.

Regards,
Wanpeng Li

>
> Here's the solution I was thinking about, it's mostly untested. I'm
> rate limiting below TICK_NSEC because I want to avoid syncing with
> the tick.
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/cputime.c b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
> index f3778e2b..a8b1e85 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/cputime.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
> @@ -676,18 +676,20 @@ void thread_group_cputime_adjusted(struct task_struct *p, u64 *ut, u64 *st)
>  #ifdef CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING_GEN
>  static u64 vtime_delta(struct task_struct *tsk)
>  {
> -       unsigned long now = READ_ONCE(jiffies);
> +       return ktime_sub(ktime_get(), tsk->vtime_snap);
> +}
>
> -       if (time_before(now, (unsigned long)tsk->vtime_snap))
> -               return 0;
> +/* A little bit less than the tick period */
> +#define VTIME_RATE_LIMIT (TICK_NSEC - 200000)
>
> -       return jiffies_to_nsecs(now - tsk->vtime_snap);
> +static bool vtime_should_account(struct task_struct *tsk)
> +{
> +       return vtime_delta(tsk) > VTIME_RATE_LIMIT;
>  }
>
>  static u64 get_vtime_delta(struct task_struct *tsk)
>  {
> -       unsigned long now = READ_ONCE(jiffies);
> -       u64 delta, other;
> +       u64 delta, other, now = ktime_get();
>
>         /*
>          * Unlike tick based timing, vtime based timing never has lost
> @@ -696,7 +698,7 @@ static u64 get_vtime_delta(struct task_struct *tsk)
>          * elapsed time. Limit account_other_time to prevent rounding
>          * errors from causing elapsed vtime to go negative.
>          */
> -       delta = jiffies_to_nsecs(now - tsk->vtime_snap);
> +       delta = ktime_sub(now, tsk->vtime_snap);
>         other = account_other_time(delta);
>         WARN_ON_ONCE(tsk->vtime_snap_whence == VTIME_INACTIVE);
>         tsk->vtime_snap = now;
> @@ -711,7 +713,7 @@ static void __vtime_account_system(struct task_struct *tsk)
>
>  void vtime_account_system(struct task_struct *tsk)
>  {
> -       if (!vtime_delta(tsk))
> +       if (!vtime_should_account(tsk))
>                 return;
>
>         write_seqcount_begin(&tsk->vtime_seqcount);
> @@ -723,7 +725,7 @@ void vtime_account_user(struct task_struct *tsk)
>  {
>         write_seqcount_begin(&tsk->vtime_seqcount);
>         tsk->vtime_snap_whence = VTIME_SYS;
> -       if (vtime_delta(tsk))
> +       if (vtime_should_account(tsk))
>                 account_user_time(tsk, get_vtime_delta(tsk));
>         write_seqcount_end(&tsk->vtime_seqcount);
>  }
> @@ -731,7 +733,7 @@ void vtime_account_user(struct task_struct *tsk)
>  void vtime_user_enter(struct task_struct *tsk)
>  {
>         write_seqcount_begin(&tsk->vtime_seqcount);
> -       if (vtime_delta(tsk))
> +       if (vtime_should_account(tsk))
>                 __vtime_account_system(tsk);
>         tsk->vtime_snap_whence = VTIME_USER;
>         write_seqcount_end(&tsk->vtime_seqcount);
> @@ -747,7 +749,7 @@ void vtime_guest_enter(struct task_struct *tsk)
>          * that can thus safely catch up with a tickless delta.
>          */
>         write_seqcount_begin(&tsk->vtime_seqcount);
> -       if (vtime_delta(tsk))
> +       if (vtime_should_account(tsk))
>                 __vtime_account_system(tsk);
>         current->flags |= PF_VCPU;
>         write_seqcount_end(&tsk->vtime_seqcount);
> @@ -776,7 +778,7 @@ void arch_vtime_task_switch(struct task_struct *prev)
>
>         write_seqcount_begin(&current->vtime_seqcount);
>         current->vtime_snap_whence = VTIME_SYS;
> -       current->vtime_snap = jiffies;
> +       current->vtime_snap = ktime_get();
>         write_seqcount_end(&current->vtime_seqcount);
>  }
>

  reply	other threads:[~2017-03-30 12:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-23 20:55 [BUG nohz]: wrong user and system time accounting Luiz Capitulino
2017-03-24  0:56 ` Rik van Riel
2017-03-24  1:05   ` Luiz Capitulino
2017-03-24  1:08     ` Rik van Riel
2017-03-24  1:39       ` Luiz Capitulino
2017-03-27  5:33   ` lkml
2017-03-24  1:52 ` Wanpeng Li
2017-03-24  3:56   ` Luiz Capitulino
2017-03-27  1:56 ` Wanpeng Li
2017-03-27 17:35   ` Rik van Riel
2017-03-28  7:19     ` Wanpeng Li
     [not found]     ` <20170328132406.7d23579c@redhat.com>
     [not found]       ` <20170328161454.4a5d9e8b@redhat.com>
2017-03-28 21:01         ` Rik van Riel
2017-03-28 21:26           ` Luiz Capitulino
2017-03-29  9:56             ` Wanpeng Li
2017-03-29 12:56               ` Frederic Weisbecker
2017-03-28 21:24         ` Rik van Riel
2017-03-28 21:30           ` Luiz Capitulino
     [not found]       ` <20170329131656.1d6cb743@redhat.com>
2017-03-29 20:08         ` Rik van Riel
2017-03-29 22:54           ` Frederic Weisbecker
2017-03-30 12:57             ` Rik van Riel
2017-03-30  1:58           ` Wanpeng Li
2017-03-30 12:40             ` Frederic Weisbecker
2017-03-30 13:19               ` Mike Galbraith
2017-03-30  4:27           ` Mike Galbraith
2017-03-30  6:47             ` Wanpeng Li
2017-03-30 11:52               ` Wanpeng Li
2017-03-30 12:33                 ` Mike Galbraith
2017-03-30 13:38               ` Frederic Weisbecker
2017-03-30 13:59                 ` Wanpeng Li
2017-03-30 14:18                   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2017-03-30 21:25                     ` Luiz Capitulino
2017-03-31 20:09                       ` Luiz Capitulino
2017-03-31 23:24                         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2017-04-01  3:11                           ` Luiz Capitulino
2017-04-03 15:23                             ` Frederic Weisbecker
2017-04-03 19:06                               ` Luiz Capitulino
2017-04-04 17:36                                 ` Luiz Capitulino
2017-04-05 14:26                                   ` Rik van Riel
2017-04-11 11:03                 ` Wanpeng Li
2017-04-11 11:36                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-04-11 11:43                     ` Wanpeng Li
2017-04-11 14:22               ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-04-12 13:18                 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2017-04-12 14:57                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-04-12 15:14                     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2017-04-13  4:31                     ` Wanpeng Li
2017-04-13 13:32                       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2017-05-02 10:01                         ` Wanpeng Li
2017-05-15  8:17                           ` Wanpeng Li
2017-06-29 17:22                             ` Frederic Weisbecker
2017-03-30 12:51             ` Frederic Weisbecker
2017-03-30 13:02               ` Rik van Riel
2017-03-30 13:35                 ` Mike Galbraith
2017-04-03 14:40                   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2017-04-04  7:32                     ` Mike Galbraith
2017-03-30 13:44                 ` Frederic Weisbecker
     [not found]         ` <20170329221700.GB23895@lerouge>
2017-03-29 22:46           ` Wanpeng Li
2017-03-30  2:14             ` Luiz Capitulino
2017-03-30 12:27               ` Wanpeng Li [this message]
2017-03-27 18:38   ` Luiz Capitulino
2017-03-28  5:28     ` Wanpeng Li
2017-03-28 13:44       ` Luiz Capitulino
2017-03-29 13:04 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2017-03-29 13:14   ` Rik van Riel
2017-03-29 13:23     ` Luiz Capitulino
2017-03-29 21:12       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2017-03-30  1:48         ` Luiz Capitulino

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CANRm+CxxZzHSZhSO-EJAohz5Q7-Fqwo-e_b15CVjJy9nYEydCA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=kernellwp@gmail.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).