* Not able to set smp_affinity for an IRQ on i.MX7 @ 2018-05-11 11:34 Pintu Kumar [not found] ` <5af57fea.1c69fb81.885f0.2377.GMRIR@mx.google.com> 0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread From: Pintu Kumar @ 2018-05-11 11:34 UTC (permalink / raw) To: open list, linux-pm, linux-arm-kernel, kernelnewbies [-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1550 bytes --] Hi, I need one help. I am using i.MX7 Sabre board with kernel version 4.1.15 Let's say I am interested in GPIO number: 21 I wanted to set CPU affinity for particular GPIO->IRQ number, so I tried the below steps: root@10:~# echo 21 > /sys/class/gpio/export root@10:~# echo "rising" > /sys/class/gpio/gpio21/edge root@10:~# cat /proc/interrupts | grep 21 47: 0 0 gpio-mxc 21 Edge gpiolib root@10:~# cat /sys/class/gpio/gpio21/direction in root@10:~# cat /proc/irq/47/smp_affinity 3 root@10:~# echo 2 > /proc/irq/47/smp_affinity -bash: echo: write error: Input/output error But I get input/output error. When I debug further, found that irq_can_set_affinity is returning 0: [ 0.000000] genirq: irq_can_set_affinity (0): balance: 1, irq_data.chip: a81b7e48, irq_set_affinity: (null) [ 0.000000] write_irq_affinity: FAIL I also tried first setting /proc/irq/default_smp_affinity to 2 (from 3). This change is working, but the smp_affinity setting for the new IRQ is not working. When I try to set smp_affinity for mmc0, then it works. # cat /proc/interrupts | grep mmc 295: 55 0 GPCV2 22 Edge mmc0 296: 0 0 GPCV2 23 Edge mmc1 297: 52 0 GPCV2 24 Edge mmc2 root@10:~# echo 2 > /proc/irq/295/smp_affinity root@10:~# So, I wanted to know what are the conditions for which setting smp_affinity for an IRQ will work ? Is there any way by which I can set CPU affinity to a GPIO -> IRQ ? Whether, irq_set_affinity_hint() will work in this case ? Thanks, Pintu [-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 4264 bytes --] [-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 170 bytes --] _______________________________________________ Kernelnewbies mailing list Kernelnewbies@kernelnewbies.org https://lists.kernelnewbies.org/mailman/listinfo/kernelnewbies ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <5af57fea.1c69fb81.885f0.2377.GMRIR@mx.google.com>]
* Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) [not found] ` <5af57fea.1c69fb81.885f0.2377.GMRIR@mx.google.com> @ 2018-05-11 11:37 ` Pintu Kumar 2018-05-11 12:39 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread From: Pintu Kumar @ 2018-05-11 11:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: open list, linux-arm-kernel, Russell King - ARM Linux, kernelnewbies Hi, I need one help. I am using i.MX7 Sabre board with kernel version 4.1.15 Let's say I am interested in GPIO number: 21 I wanted to set CPU affinity for particular GPIO->IRQ number, so I tried the below steps: root@10:~# echo 21 > /sys/class/gpio/export root@10:~# echo "rising" > /sys/class/gpio/gpio21/edge root@10:~# cat /proc/interrupts | grep 21 47: 0 0 gpio-mxc 21 Edge gpiolib root@10:~# cat /sys/class/gpio/gpio21/direction in root@10:~# cat /proc/irq/47/smp_affinity 3 root@10:~# echo 2 > /proc/irq/47/smp_affinity -bash: echo: write error: Input/output error But I get input/output error. When I debug further, found that irq_can_set_affinity is returning 0: [ 0.000000] genirq: irq_can_set_affinity (0): balance: 1, irq_data.chip: a81b7e48, irq_set_affinity: (null) [ 0.000000] write_irq_affinity: FAIL I also tried first setting /proc/irq/default_smp_affinity to 2 (from 3). This change is working, but the smp_affinity setting for the new IRQ is not working. When I try to set smp_affinity for mmc0, then it works. # cat /proc/interrupts | grep mmc 295: 55 0 GPCV2 22 Edge mmc0 296: 0 0 GPCV2 23 Edge mmc1 297: 52 0 GPCV2 24 Edge mmc2 root@10:~# echo 2 > /proc/irq/295/smp_affinity root@10:~# So, I wanted to know what are the conditions for which setting smp_affinity for an IRQ will work ? Is there any way by which I can set CPU affinity to a GPIO -> IRQ ? Whether, irq_set_affinity_hint() will work in this case ? Thanks, Pintu ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) 2018-05-11 11:37 ` Delivery Status Notification (Failure) Pintu Kumar @ 2018-05-11 12:39 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2018-05-11 13:04 ` Lucas Stach 0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread From: Russell King - ARM Linux @ 2018-05-11 12:39 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Pintu Kumar; +Cc: open list, linux-arm-kernel, kernelnewbies On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 05:07:37PM +0530, Pintu Kumar wrote: > Hi, > > I need one help. > I am using i.MX7 Sabre board with kernel version 4.1.15 > > Let's say I am interested in GPIO number: 21 > I wanted to set CPU affinity for particular GPIO->IRQ number, so I > tried the below steps: > root@10:~# echo 21 > /sys/class/gpio/export > root@10:~# echo "rising" > /sys/class/gpio/gpio21/edge > root@10:~# cat /proc/interrupts | grep 21 > 47: 0 0 gpio-mxc 21 Edge gpiolib > root@10:~# cat /sys/class/gpio/gpio21/direction > in > root@10:~# cat /proc/irq/47/smp_affinity > 3 > root@10:~# echo 2 > /proc/irq/47/smp_affinity > -bash: echo: write error: Input/output error > > But I get input/output error. > When I debug further, found that irq_can_set_affinity is returning 0: > [ 0.000000] genirq: irq_can_set_affinity (0): balance: 1, > irq_data.chip: a81b7e48, irq_set_affinity: (null) > [ 0.000000] write_irq_affinity: FAIL > > I also tried first setting /proc/irq/default_smp_affinity to 2 (from 3). > This change is working, but the smp_affinity setting for the new IRQ > is not working. > > When I try to set smp_affinity for mmc0, then it works. > # cat /proc/interrupts | grep mmc > 295: 55 0 GPCV2 22 Edge mmc0 > 296: 0 0 GPCV2 23 Edge mmc1 > 297: 52 0 GPCV2 24 Edge mmc2 > > root@10:~# echo 2 > /proc/irq/295/smp_affinity > root@10:~# > > > So, I wanted to know what are the conditions for which setting > smp_affinity for an IRQ will work ? > > Is there any way by which I can set CPU affinity to a GPIO -> IRQ ? > Whether, irq_set_affinity_hint() will work in this case ? IRQ affinity is only supported where interrupts are _directly_ wired to the GIC. It's the GIC which does the interrupt steering to the CPU cores. Interrupts on downstream interrupt controllers (such as GPCV2) have no ability to be directed independently to other CPUs - the only possible way to change the mapping is to move _all_ interrupts on that controller, and any downstream chained interrupts at GIC level. Hence why Interrupt 295 has no irq_set_affinity function: there is no way for the interrupt controller itself to change the affinity of the input interrupt. -- RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 8.8Mbps down 630kbps up According to speedtest.net: 8.21Mbps down 510kbps up ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) 2018-05-11 12:39 ` Russell King - ARM Linux @ 2018-05-11 13:04 ` Lucas Stach 2018-05-11 14:37 ` Pintu Kumar 0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread From: Lucas Stach @ 2018-05-11 13:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Russell King - ARM Linux, Pintu Kumar Cc: open list, linux-arm-kernel, kernelnewbies Am Freitag, den 11.05.2018, 13:39 +0100 schrieb Russell King - ARM Linux: > On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 05:07:37PM +0530, Pintu Kumar wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I need one help. > > I am using i.MX7 Sabre board with kernel version 4.1.15 > > > > Let's say I am interested in GPIO number: 21 > > I wanted to set CPU affinity for particular GPIO->IRQ number, so I > > tried the below steps: > > root@10:~# echo 21 > /sys/class/gpio/export > > root@10:~# echo "rising" > /sys/class/gpio/gpio21/edge > > root@10:~# cat /proc/interrupts | grep 21 > > 47: 0 0 gpio-mxc 21 Edge gpiolib > > root@10:~# cat /sys/class/gpio/gpio21/direction > > in > > root@10:~# cat /proc/irq/47/smp_affinity > > 3 > > root@10:~# echo 2 > /proc/irq/47/smp_affinity > > -bash: echo: write error: Input/output error > > > > But I get input/output error. > > When I debug further, found that irq_can_set_affinity is returning 0: > > [ 0.000000] genirq: irq_can_set_affinity (0): balance: 1, > > irq_data.chip: a81b7e48, irq_set_affinity: (null) > > [ 0.000000] write_irq_affinity: FAIL > > > > I also tried first setting /proc/irq/default_smp_affinity to 2 (from 3). > > This change is working, but the smp_affinity setting for the new IRQ > > is not working. > > > > When I try to set smp_affinity for mmc0, then it works. > > # cat /proc/interrupts | grep mmc > > 295: 55 0 GPCV2 22 Edge mmc0 > > 296: 0 0 GPCV2 23 Edge mmc1 > > 297: 52 0 GPCV2 24 Edge mmc2 > > > > root@10:~# echo 2 > /proc/irq/295/smp_affinity > > root@10:~# > > > > > > So, I wanted to know what are the conditions for which setting > > smp_affinity for an IRQ will work ? > > > > Is there any way by which I can set CPU affinity to a GPIO -> IRQ ? > > Whether, irq_set_affinity_hint() will work in this case ? > > IRQ affinity is only supported where interrupts are _directly_ wired to > the GIC. It's the GIC which does the interrupt steering to the CPU > cores. > > Interrupts on downstream interrupt controllers (such as GPCV2) have no > ability to be directed independently to other CPUs - the only possible > way to change the mapping is to move _all_ interrupts on that controller, > and any downstream chained interrupts at GIC level. > > Hence why Interrupt 295 has no irq_set_affinity function: there is no way > for the interrupt controller itself to change the affinity of the input > interrupt. The GPCv2 though is a secondary IRQ controller which has a 1:1 mapping of its input IRQs to the upstream GIC IRQ lines. Affinity can thus be handled by forwarding the request to the GIC by irq_chip_set_affinity_parent(). As this is handled correctly in the upstream kernel since the first commit introducing support for the GPCv2, it seems the issue is only present in some downstream kernel. Regards, Lucas ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) 2018-05-11 13:04 ` Lucas Stach @ 2018-05-11 14:37 ` Pintu Kumar 2018-05-14 12:12 ` Pintu Kumar 0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread From: Pintu Kumar @ 2018-05-11 14:37 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Lucas Stach Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux, open list, linux-arm-kernel, kernelnewbies On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 6:34 PM, Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de> wrote: > Am Freitag, den 11.05.2018, 13:39 +0100 schrieb Russell King - ARM Linux: >> On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 05:07:37PM +0530, Pintu Kumar wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > I need one help. >> > I am using i.MX7 Sabre board with kernel version 4.1.15 >> > >> > Let's say I am interested in GPIO number: 21 >> > I wanted to set CPU affinity for particular GPIO->IRQ number, so I >> > tried the below steps: >> > root@10:~# echo 21 > /sys/class/gpio/export >> > root@10:~# echo "rising" > /sys/class/gpio/gpio21/edge >> > root@10:~# cat /proc/interrupts | grep 21 >> > 47: 0 0 gpio-mxc 21 Edge gpiolib >> > root@10:~# cat /sys/class/gpio/gpio21/direction >> > in >> > root@10:~# cat /proc/irq/47/smp_affinity >> > 3 >> > root@10:~# echo 2 > /proc/irq/47/smp_affinity >> > -bash: echo: write error: Input/output error >> > >> > But I get input/output error. >> > When I debug further, found that irq_can_set_affinity is returning 0: >> > [ 0.000000] genirq: irq_can_set_affinity (0): balance: 1, >> > irq_data.chip: a81b7e48, irq_set_affinity: (null) >> > [ 0.000000] write_irq_affinity: FAIL >> > >> > I also tried first setting /proc/irq/default_smp_affinity to 2 (from 3). >> > This change is working, but the smp_affinity setting for the new IRQ >> > is not working. >> > >> > When I try to set smp_affinity for mmc0, then it works. >> > # cat /proc/interrupts | grep mmc >> > 295: 55 0 GPCV2 22 Edge mmc0 >> > 296: 0 0 GPCV2 23 Edge mmc1 >> > 297: 52 0 GPCV2 24 Edge mmc2 >> > >> > root@10:~# echo 2 > /proc/irq/295/smp_affinity >> > root@10:~# >> > >> > >> > So, I wanted to know what are the conditions for which setting >> > smp_affinity for an IRQ will work ? >> > >> > Is there any way by which I can set CPU affinity to a GPIO -> IRQ ? >> > Whether, irq_set_affinity_hint() will work in this case ? >> >> IRQ affinity is only supported where interrupts are _directly_ wired to >> the GIC. It's the GIC which does the interrupt steering to the CPU >> cores. >> >> Interrupts on downstream interrupt controllers (such as GPCV2) have no >> ability to be directed independently to other CPUs - the only possible >> way to change the mapping is to move _all_ interrupts on that controller, >> and any downstream chained interrupts at GIC level. >> >> Hence why Interrupt 295 has no irq_set_affinity function: there is no way >> for the interrupt controller itself to change the affinity of the input >> interrupt. > > The GPCv2 though is a secondary IRQ controller which has a 1:1 mapping > of its input IRQs to the upstream GIC IRQ lines. Affinity can thus be > handled by forwarding the request to the GIC by > irq_chip_set_affinity_parent(). > > As this is handled correctly in the upstream kernel since the first > commit introducing support for the GPCv2, it seems the issue is only > present in some downstream kernel. > OK. Thanks so much for your reply. I saw some of the drivers using irq_set_affinity_hint() to force the IRQ affinity to a particular CPU. This is the sample: { cpumask_clear(mask); cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, mask); irq_set_affinity_hint(irq, mask); } Whether this logic will work for a particular GPIO pin ? > Regards, > Lucas ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) 2018-05-11 14:37 ` Pintu Kumar @ 2018-05-14 12:12 ` Pintu Kumar 2018-05-14 13:11 ` Lucas Stach 0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread From: Pintu Kumar @ 2018-05-14 12:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Lucas Stach Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux, open list, linux-arm-kernel, kernelnewbies Hi, Is there any work around possible to set IRQ affinity for some GPIO interrupt ? How to avoid CPU0 to receive the current GPIO interrupt ? How do we assign GPIO interrupts to any CPU other than CPU0 ? Is it possible to isolate CPU0 for a sometime, from my GPIO driver so that GPIO interrupt can be served by another CPU ? Need your inputs to decide whether it is still possible to set affinity for GPIO interrupt, or its impossible ? Thanks, Pintu On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 8:07 PM, Pintu Kumar <pintu.ping@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 6:34 PM, Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de> wrote: >> Am Freitag, den 11.05.2018, 13:39 +0100 schrieb Russell King - ARM Linux: >>> On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 05:07:37PM +0530, Pintu Kumar wrote: >>> > Hi, >>> > >>> > I need one help. >>> > I am using i.MX7 Sabre board with kernel version 4.1.15 >>> > >>> > Let's say I am interested in GPIO number: 21 >>> > I wanted to set CPU affinity for particular GPIO->IRQ number, so I >>> > tried the below steps: >>> > root@10:~# echo 21 > /sys/class/gpio/export >>> > root@10:~# echo "rising" > /sys/class/gpio/gpio21/edge >>> > root@10:~# cat /proc/interrupts | grep 21 >>> > 47: 0 0 gpio-mxc 21 Edge gpiolib >>> > root@10:~# cat /sys/class/gpio/gpio21/direction >>> > in >>> > root@10:~# cat /proc/irq/47/smp_affinity >>> > 3 >>> > root@10:~# echo 2 > /proc/irq/47/smp_affinity >>> > -bash: echo: write error: Input/output error >>> > >>> > But I get input/output error. >>> > When I debug further, found that irq_can_set_affinity is returning 0: >>> > [ 0.000000] genirq: irq_can_set_affinity (0): balance: 1, >>> > irq_data.chip: a81b7e48, irq_set_affinity: (null) >>> > [ 0.000000] write_irq_affinity: FAIL >>> > >>> > I also tried first setting /proc/irq/default_smp_affinity to 2 (from 3). >>> > This change is working, but the smp_affinity setting for the new IRQ >>> > is not working. >>> > >>> > When I try to set smp_affinity for mmc0, then it works. >>> > # cat /proc/interrupts | grep mmc >>> > 295: 55 0 GPCV2 22 Edge mmc0 >>> > 296: 0 0 GPCV2 23 Edge mmc1 >>> > 297: 52 0 GPCV2 24 Edge mmc2 >>> > >>> > root@10:~# echo 2 > /proc/irq/295/smp_affinity >>> > root@10:~# >>> > >>> > >>> > So, I wanted to know what are the conditions for which setting >>> > smp_affinity for an IRQ will work ? >>> > >>> > Is there any way by which I can set CPU affinity to a GPIO -> IRQ ? >>> > Whether, irq_set_affinity_hint() will work in this case ? >>> >>> IRQ affinity is only supported where interrupts are _directly_ wired to >>> the GIC. It's the GIC which does the interrupt steering to the CPU >>> cores. >>> >>> Interrupts on downstream interrupt controllers (such as GPCV2) have no >>> ability to be directed independently to other CPUs - the only possible >>> way to change the mapping is to move _all_ interrupts on that controller, >>> and any downstream chained interrupts at GIC level. >>> >>> Hence why Interrupt 295 has no irq_set_affinity function: there is no way >>> for the interrupt controller itself to change the affinity of the input >>> interrupt. >> >> The GPCv2 though is a secondary IRQ controller which has a 1:1 mapping >> of its input IRQs to the upstream GIC IRQ lines. Affinity can thus be >> handled by forwarding the request to the GIC by >> irq_chip_set_affinity_parent(). >> >> As this is handled correctly in the upstream kernel since the first >> commit introducing support for the GPCv2, it seems the issue is only >> present in some downstream kernel. >> > > OK. Thanks so much for your reply. > > I saw some of the drivers using irq_set_affinity_hint() to force the > IRQ affinity to a particular CPU. > This is the sample: > { > cpumask_clear(mask); > cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, mask); > irq_set_affinity_hint(irq, mask); > } > > Whether this logic will work for a particular GPIO pin ? > > >> Regards, >> Lucas ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) 2018-05-14 12:12 ` Pintu Kumar @ 2018-05-14 13:11 ` Lucas Stach 2018-05-14 14:28 ` Pintu Kumar 0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread From: Lucas Stach @ 2018-05-14 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Pintu Kumar Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux, open list, linux-arm-kernel, kernelnewbies Am Montag, den 14.05.2018, 17:42 +0530 schrieb Pintu Kumar: > Hi, > > Is there any work around possible to set IRQ affinity for some GPIO > interrupt ? > How to avoid CPU0 to receive the current GPIO interrupt ? > How do we assign GPIO interrupts to any CPU other than CPU0 ? > Is it possible to isolate CPU0 for a sometime, from my GPIO driver so > that GPIO interrupt can be served by another CPU ? > > Need your inputs to decide whether it is still possible to set > affinity for GPIO interrupt, or its impossible ? This is not possible. The GPIO IRQs are aggregated into one GPC/GIC IRQ line per GPIO bank, so it is not possible to change affinity of a single GPIO interrupt to another CPU. Best we could do is change the affinity of the whole bank, but given the limited usefulness of something like that, nobody bothered to implement such a thing. Regards, Lucas > > > On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 8:07 PM, Pintu Kumar <pintu.ping@gmail.com> > wrote: > > On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 6:34 PM, Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.d > > e> wrote: > > > Am Freitag, den 11.05.2018, 13:39 +0100 schrieb Russell King - > > > ARM Linux: > > > > On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 05:07:37PM +0530, Pintu Kumar wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > I need one help. > > > > > I am using i.MX7 Sabre board with kernel version 4.1.15 > > > > > > > > > > Let's say I am interested in GPIO number: 21 > > > > > I wanted to set CPU affinity for particular GPIO->IRQ number, > > > > > so I > > > > > tried the below steps: > > > > > root@10:~# echo 21 > /sys/class/gpio/export > > > > > root@10:~# echo "rising" > /sys/class/gpio/gpio21/edge > > > > > root@10:~# cat /proc/interrupts | grep 21 > > > > > 47: 0 0 gpio-mxc 21 Edge gpiolib > > > > > root@10:~# cat /sys/class/gpio/gpio21/direction > > > > > in > > > > > root@10:~# cat /proc/irq/47/smp_affinity > > > > > 3 > > > > > root@10:~# echo 2 > /proc/irq/47/smp_affinity > > > > > -bash: echo: write error: Input/output error > > > > > > > > > > But I get input/output error. > > > > > When I debug further, found that irq_can_set_affinity is > > > > > returning 0: > > > > > [ 0.000000] genirq: irq_can_set_affinity (0): balance: 1, > > > > > irq_data.chip: a81b7e48, irq_set_affinity: (null) > > > > > [ 0.000000] write_irq_affinity: FAIL > > > > > > > > > > I also tried first setting /proc/irq/default_smp_affinity to > > > > > 2 (from 3). > > > > > This change is working, but the smp_affinity setting for the > > > > > new IRQ > > > > > is not working. > > > > > > > > > > When I try to set smp_affinity for mmc0, then it works. > > > > > # cat /proc/interrupts | grep mmc > > > > > 295: 55 0 GPCV2 22 Edge mmc0 > > > > > 296: 0 0 GPCV2 23 Edge mmc1 > > > > > 297: 52 0 GPCV2 24 Edge mmc2 > > > > > > > > > > root@10:~# echo 2 > /proc/irq/295/smp_affinity > > > > > root@10:~# > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, I wanted to know what are the conditions for which > > > > > setting > > > > > smp_affinity for an IRQ will work ? > > > > > > > > > > Is there any way by which I can set CPU affinity to a GPIO -> > > > > > IRQ ? > > > > > Whether, irq_set_affinity_hint() will work in this case ? > > > > > > > > IRQ affinity is only supported where interrupts are _directly_ > > > > wired to > > > > the GIC. It's the GIC which does the interrupt steering to the > > > > CPU > > > > cores. > > > > > > > > Interrupts on downstream interrupt controllers (such as GPCV2) > > > > have no > > > > ability to be directed independently to other CPUs - the only > > > > possible > > > > way to change the mapping is to move _all_ interrupts on that > > > > controller, > > > > and any downstream chained interrupts at GIC level. > > > > > > > > Hence why Interrupt 295 has no irq_set_affinity function: there > > > > is no way > > > > for the interrupt controller itself to change the affinity of > > > > the input > > > > interrupt. > > > > > > The GPCv2 though is a secondary IRQ controller which has a 1:1 > > > mapping > > > of its input IRQs to the upstream GIC IRQ lines. Affinity can > > > thus be > > > handled by forwarding the request to the GIC by > > > irq_chip_set_affinity_parent(). > > > > > > As this is handled correctly in the upstream kernel since the > > > first > > > commit introducing support for the GPCv2, it seems the issue is > > > only > > > present in some downstream kernel. > > > > > > > OK. Thanks so much for your reply. > > > > I saw some of the drivers using irq_set_affinity_hint() to force > > the > > IRQ affinity to a particular CPU. > > This is the sample: > > { > > cpumask_clear(mask); > > cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, mask); > > irq_set_affinity_hint(irq, mask); > > } > > > > Whether this logic will work for a particular GPIO pin ? > > > > > > > Regards, > > > Lucas ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) 2018-05-14 13:11 ` Lucas Stach @ 2018-05-14 14:28 ` Pintu Kumar 2018-05-17 13:28 ` Pintu Kumar 0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread From: Pintu Kumar @ 2018-05-14 14:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Lucas Stach Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux, open list, linux-arm-kernel, kernelnewbies On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 6:41 PM, Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de> wrote: > Am Montag, den 14.05.2018, 17:42 +0530 schrieb Pintu Kumar: >> Hi, >> >> Is there any work around possible to set IRQ affinity for some GPIO >> interrupt ? >> How to avoid CPU0 to receive the current GPIO interrupt ? >> How do we assign GPIO interrupts to any CPU other than CPU0 ? >> Is it possible to isolate CPU0 for a sometime, from my GPIO driver so >> that GPIO interrupt can be served by another CPU ? >> >> Need your inputs to decide whether it is still possible to set >> affinity for GPIO interrupt, or its impossible ? > > This is not possible. The GPIO IRQs are aggregated into one GPC/GIC IRQ > line per GPIO bank, so it is not possible to change affinity of a > single GPIO interrupt to another CPU. OK. Thanks for your confirmation. > Best we could do is change the > affinity of the whole bank, OK. How can we do this on the fly from my driver code. If you have any reference please let me know. This is required only for experimental purpose to prove the point to be mgmt. My idea is, from the driver, change the affinity of the whole bank. So, the GPIO interrupt can be delivered on to this specific CPU bank. Once I am done, I will revert back to the old bank. Please give me some hint on how to do this from my kernel module.... > but given the limited usefulness of > something like that, nobody bothered to implement such a thing. > > Regards, > Lucas > >> >> >> On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 8:07 PM, Pintu Kumar <pintu.ping@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 6:34 PM, Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.d >> > e> wrote: >> > > Am Freitag, den 11.05.2018, 13:39 +0100 schrieb Russell King - >> > > ARM Linux: >> > > > On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 05:07:37PM +0530, Pintu Kumar wrote: >> > > > > Hi, >> > > > > >> > > > > I need one help. >> > > > > I am using i.MX7 Sabre board with kernel version 4.1.15 >> > > > > >> > > > > Let's say I am interested in GPIO number: 21 >> > > > > I wanted to set CPU affinity for particular GPIO->IRQ number, >> > > > > so I >> > > > > tried the below steps: >> > > > > root@10:~# echo 21 > /sys/class/gpio/export >> > > > > root@10:~# echo "rising" > /sys/class/gpio/gpio21/edge >> > > > > root@10:~# cat /proc/interrupts | grep 21 >> > > > > 47: 0 0 gpio-mxc 21 Edge gpiolib >> > > > > root@10:~# cat /sys/class/gpio/gpio21/direction >> > > > > in >> > > > > root@10:~# cat /proc/irq/47/smp_affinity >> > > > > 3 >> > > > > root@10:~# echo 2 > /proc/irq/47/smp_affinity >> > > > > -bash: echo: write error: Input/output error >> > > > > >> > > > > But I get input/output error. >> > > > > When I debug further, found that irq_can_set_affinity is >> > > > > returning 0: >> > > > > [ 0.000000] genirq: irq_can_set_affinity (0): balance: 1, >> > > > > irq_data.chip: a81b7e48, irq_set_affinity: (null) >> > > > > [ 0.000000] write_irq_affinity: FAIL >> > > > > >> > > > > I also tried first setting /proc/irq/default_smp_affinity to >> > > > > 2 (from 3). >> > > > > This change is working, but the smp_affinity setting for the >> > > > > new IRQ >> > > > > is not working. >> > > > > >> > > > > When I try to set smp_affinity for mmc0, then it works. >> > > > > # cat /proc/interrupts | grep mmc >> > > > > 295: 55 0 GPCV2 22 Edge mmc0 >> > > > > 296: 0 0 GPCV2 23 Edge mmc1 >> > > > > 297: 52 0 GPCV2 24 Edge mmc2 >> > > > > >> > > > > root@10:~# echo 2 > /proc/irq/295/smp_affinity >> > > > > root@10:~# >> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > So, I wanted to know what are the conditions for which >> > > > > setting >> > > > > smp_affinity for an IRQ will work ? >> > > > > >> > > > > Is there any way by which I can set CPU affinity to a GPIO -> >> > > > > IRQ ? >> > > > > Whether, irq_set_affinity_hint() will work in this case ? >> > > > >> > > > IRQ affinity is only supported where interrupts are _directly_ >> > > > wired to >> > > > the GIC. It's the GIC which does the interrupt steering to the >> > > > CPU >> > > > cores. >> > > > >> > > > Interrupts on downstream interrupt controllers (such as GPCV2) >> > > > have no >> > > > ability to be directed independently to other CPUs - the only >> > > > possible >> > > > way to change the mapping is to move _all_ interrupts on that >> > > > controller, >> > > > and any downstream chained interrupts at GIC level. >> > > > >> > > > Hence why Interrupt 295 has no irq_set_affinity function: there >> > > > is no way >> > > > for the interrupt controller itself to change the affinity of >> > > > the input >> > > > interrupt. >> > > >> > > The GPCv2 though is a secondary IRQ controller which has a 1:1 >> > > mapping >> > > of its input IRQs to the upstream GIC IRQ lines. Affinity can >> > > thus be >> > > handled by forwarding the request to the GIC by >> > > irq_chip_set_affinity_parent(). >> > > >> > > As this is handled correctly in the upstream kernel since the >> > > first >> > > commit introducing support for the GPCv2, it seems the issue is >> > > only >> > > present in some downstream kernel. >> > > >> > >> > OK. Thanks so much for your reply. >> > >> > I saw some of the drivers using irq_set_affinity_hint() to force >> > the >> > IRQ affinity to a particular CPU. >> > This is the sample: >> > { >> > cpumask_clear(mask); >> > cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, mask); >> > irq_set_affinity_hint(irq, mask); >> > } >> > >> > Whether this logic will work for a particular GPIO pin ? >> > >> > >> > > Regards, >> > > Lucas ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) 2018-05-14 14:28 ` Pintu Kumar @ 2018-05-17 13:28 ` Pintu Kumar 2018-05-21 18:51 ` Pintu Kumar 0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread From: Pintu Kumar @ 2018-05-17 13:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Lucas Stach Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux, open list, linux-arm-kernel, kernelnewbies On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 7:58 PM, Pintu Kumar <pintu.ping@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 6:41 PM, Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de> wrote: > > Am Montag, den 14.05.2018, 17:42 +0530 schrieb Pintu Kumar: > >> Hi, > >> > >> Is there any work around possible to set IRQ affinity for some GPIO > >> interrupt ? > >> How to avoid CPU0 to receive the current GPIO interrupt ? > >> How do we assign GPIO interrupts to any CPU other than CPU0 ? > >> Is it possible to isolate CPU0 for a sometime, from my GPIO driver so > >> that GPIO interrupt can be served by another CPU ? > >> > >> Need your inputs to decide whether it is still possible to set > >> affinity for GPIO interrupt, or its impossible ? > > > > This is not possible. The GPIO IRQs are aggregated into one GPC/GIC IRQ > > line per GPIO bank, so it is not possible to change affinity of a > > single GPIO interrupt to another CPU. > > OK. Thanks for your confirmation. > > > Best we could do is change the > > affinity of the whole bank, > Hi, I found that the driver is responsible for setting GPIO bank in i.MX7: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v4.2/source/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c However I still dont know how to set the cpumask for one of the GPIO Bank. >From this link, it seems it is possible to set affinity for a GPIO IRQ. https://community.nxp.com/thread/303144 But when I try it form my GPIO138 (GPIO5_IO10) it did not help. So, as you said, I wanted to change affinity for the whole GPIO bank and try it. Please give me some pointers. Thanks > OK. How can we do this on the fly from my driver code. > If you have any reference please let me know. > This is required only for experimental purpose to prove the point to be mgmt. > My idea is, from the driver, change the affinity of the whole bank. > So, the GPIO interrupt can be delivered on to this specific CPU bank. > Once I am done, I will revert back to the old bank. > Please give me some hint on how to do this from my kernel module.... > > > > but given the limited usefulness of > > something like that, nobody bothered to implement such a thing. > > > > Regards, > > Lucas > > > >> > >> > >> On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 8:07 PM, Pintu Kumar <pintu.ping@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 6:34 PM, Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.d > >> > e> wrote: > >> > > Am Freitag, den 11.05.2018, 13:39 +0100 schrieb Russell King - > >> > > ARM Linux: > >> > > > On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 05:07:37PM +0530, Pintu Kumar wrote: > >> > > > > Hi, > >> > > > > > >> > > > > I need one help. > >> > > > > I am using i.MX7 Sabre board with kernel version 4.1.15 > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Let's say I am interested in GPIO number: 21 > >> > > > > I wanted to set CPU affinity for particular GPIO->IRQ number, > >> > > > > so I > >> > > > > tried the below steps: > >> > > > > root@10:~# echo 21 > /sys/class/gpio/export > >> > > > > root@10:~# echo "rising" > /sys/class/gpio/gpio21/edge > >> > > > > root@10:~# cat /proc/interrupts | grep 21 > >> > > > > 47: 0 0 gpio-mxc 21 Edge gpiolib > >> > > > > root@10:~# cat /sys/class/gpio/gpio21/direction > >> > > > > in > >> > > > > root@10:~# cat /proc/irq/47/smp_affinity > >> > > > > 3 > >> > > > > root@10:~# echo 2 > /proc/irq/47/smp_affinity > >> > > > > -bash: echo: write error: Input/output error > >> > > > > > >> > > > > But I get input/output error. > >> > > > > When I debug further, found that irq_can_set_affinity is > >> > > > > returning 0: > >> > > > > [ 0.000000] genirq: irq_can_set_affinity (0): balance: 1, > >> > > > > irq_data.chip: a81b7e48, irq_set_affinity: (null) > >> > > > > [ 0.000000] write_irq_affinity: FAIL > >> > > > > > >> > > > > I also tried first setting /proc/irq/default_smp_affinity to > >> > > > > 2 (from 3). > >> > > > > This change is working, but the smp_affinity setting for the > >> > > > > new IRQ > >> > > > > is not working. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > When I try to set smp_affinity for mmc0, then it works. > >> > > > > # cat /proc/interrupts | grep mmc > >> > > > > 295: 55 0 GPCV2 22 Edge mmc0 > >> > > > > 296: 0 0 GPCV2 23 Edge mmc1 > >> > > > > 297: 52 0 GPCV2 24 Edge mmc2 > >> > > > > > >> > > > > root@10:~# echo 2 > /proc/irq/295/smp_affinity > >> > > > > root@10:~# > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > So, I wanted to know what are the conditions for which > >> > > > > setting > >> > > > > smp_affinity for an IRQ will work ? > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Is there any way by which I can set CPU affinity to a GPIO -> > >> > > > > IRQ ? > >> > > > > Whether, irq_set_affinity_hint() will work in this case ? > >> > > > > >> > > > IRQ affinity is only supported where interrupts are _directly_ > >> > > > wired to > >> > > > the GIC. It's the GIC which does the interrupt steering to the > >> > > > CPU > >> > > > cores. > >> > > > > >> > > > Interrupts on downstream interrupt controllers (such as GPCV2) > >> > > > have no > >> > > > ability to be directed independently to other CPUs - the only > >> > > > possible > >> > > > way to change the mapping is to move _all_ interrupts on that > >> > > > controller, > >> > > > and any downstream chained interrupts at GIC level. > >> > > > > >> > > > Hence why Interrupt 295 has no irq_set_affinity function: there > >> > > > is no way > >> > > > for the interrupt controller itself to change the affinity of > >> > > > the input > >> > > > interrupt. > >> > > > >> > > The GPCv2 though is a secondary IRQ controller which has a 1:1 > >> > > mapping > >> > > of its input IRQs to the upstream GIC IRQ lines. Affinity can > >> > > thus be > >> > > handled by forwarding the request to the GIC by > >> > > irq_chip_set_affinity_parent(). > >> > > > >> > > As this is handled correctly in the upstream kernel since the > >> > > first > >> > > commit introducing support for the GPCv2, it seems the issue is > >> > > only > >> > > present in some downstream kernel. > >> > > > >> > > >> > OK. Thanks so much for your reply. > >> > > >> > I saw some of the drivers using irq_set_affinity_hint() to force > >> > the > >> > IRQ affinity to a particular CPU. > >> > This is the sample: > >> > { > >> > cpumask_clear(mask); > >> > cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, mask); > >> > irq_set_affinity_hint(irq, mask); > >> > } > >> > > >> > Whether this logic will work for a particular GPIO pin ? > >> > > > >> > > >> > > Regards, > >> > > Lucas ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) 2018-05-17 13:28 ` Pintu Kumar @ 2018-05-21 18:51 ` Pintu Kumar 0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: Pintu Kumar @ 2018-05-21 18:51 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Lucas Stach Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux, open list, linux-arm-kernel, kernelnewbies Dear Lucas, Can you give me some pointers on how to set affinity for entire GPIO Bank. Currently I am exploring drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c to find out how the GPIO banks are set up. I also found that affinity can be set using: desc->irq_data.affinity, may be by using cpumask_copy(...). But still I am not familiar with this. So, I need your help. Thank You! Regards, Pintu On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 6:58 PM, Pintu Kumar <pintu.ping@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 7:58 PM, Pintu Kumar <pintu.ping@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 6:41 PM, Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de> wrote: >> > Am Montag, den 14.05.2018, 17:42 +0530 schrieb Pintu Kumar: >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> Is there any work around possible to set IRQ affinity for some GPIO >> >> interrupt ? >> >> How to avoid CPU0 to receive the current GPIO interrupt ? >> >> How do we assign GPIO interrupts to any CPU other than CPU0 ? >> >> Is it possible to isolate CPU0 for a sometime, from my GPIO driver so >> >> that GPIO interrupt can be served by another CPU ? >> >> >> >> Need your inputs to decide whether it is still possible to set >> >> affinity for GPIO interrupt, or its impossible ? >> > >> > This is not possible. The GPIO IRQs are aggregated into one GPC/GIC IRQ >> > line per GPIO bank, so it is not possible to change affinity of a >> > single GPIO interrupt to another CPU. >> >> OK. Thanks for your confirmation. >> >> > Best we could do is change the >> > affinity of the whole bank, >> > > Hi, > > I found that the driver is responsible for setting GPIO bank in i.MX7: > https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v4.2/source/drivers/gpio/gpio-mxc.c > > However I still dont know how to set the cpumask for one of the GPIO Bank. > > From this link, it seems it is possible to set affinity for a GPIO IRQ. > https://community.nxp.com/thread/303144 > > But when I try it form my GPIO138 (GPIO5_IO10) it did not help. > > So, as you said, I wanted to change affinity for the whole GPIO bank and try it. > Please give me some pointers. > > Thanks > > >> OK. How can we do this on the fly from my driver code. >> If you have any reference please let me know. >> This is required only for experimental purpose to prove the point to be mgmt. >> My idea is, from the driver, change the affinity of the whole bank. >> So, the GPIO interrupt can be delivered on to this specific CPU bank. >> Once I am done, I will revert back to the old bank. >> Please give me some hint on how to do this from my kernel module.... >> >> >> > but given the limited usefulness of >> > something like that, nobody bothered to implement such a thing. >> > >> > Regards, >> > Lucas >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 8:07 PM, Pintu Kumar <pintu.ping@gmail.com> >> >> wrote: >> >> > On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 6:34 PM, Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.d >> >> > e> wrote: >> >> > > Am Freitag, den 11.05.2018, 13:39 +0100 schrieb Russell King - >> >> > > ARM Linux: >> >> > > > On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 05:07:37PM +0530, Pintu Kumar wrote: >> >> > > > > Hi, >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > I need one help. >> >> > > > > I am using i.MX7 Sabre board with kernel version 4.1.15 >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > Let's say I am interested in GPIO number: 21 >> >> > > > > I wanted to set CPU affinity for particular GPIO->IRQ number, >> >> > > > > so I >> >> > > > > tried the below steps: >> >> > > > > root@10:~# echo 21 > /sys/class/gpio/export >> >> > > > > root@10:~# echo "rising" > /sys/class/gpio/gpio21/edge >> >> > > > > root@10:~# cat /proc/interrupts | grep 21 >> >> > > > > 47: 0 0 gpio-mxc 21 Edge gpiolib >> >> > > > > root@10:~# cat /sys/class/gpio/gpio21/direction >> >> > > > > in >> >> > > > > root@10:~# cat /proc/irq/47/smp_affinity >> >> > > > > 3 >> >> > > > > root@10:~# echo 2 > /proc/irq/47/smp_affinity >> >> > > > > -bash: echo: write error: Input/output error >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > But I get input/output error. >> >> > > > > When I debug further, found that irq_can_set_affinity is >> >> > > > > returning 0: >> >> > > > > [ 0.000000] genirq: irq_can_set_affinity (0): balance: 1, >> >> > > > > irq_data.chip: a81b7e48, irq_set_affinity: (null) >> >> > > > > [ 0.000000] write_irq_affinity: FAIL >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > I also tried first setting /proc/irq/default_smp_affinity to >> >> > > > > 2 (from 3). >> >> > > > > This change is working, but the smp_affinity setting for the >> >> > > > > new IRQ >> >> > > > > is not working. >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > When I try to set smp_affinity for mmc0, then it works. >> >> > > > > # cat /proc/interrupts | grep mmc >> >> > > > > 295: 55 0 GPCV2 22 Edge mmc0 >> >> > > > > 296: 0 0 GPCV2 23 Edge mmc1 >> >> > > > > 297: 52 0 GPCV2 24 Edge mmc2 >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > root@10:~# echo 2 > /proc/irq/295/smp_affinity >> >> > > > > root@10:~# >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > So, I wanted to know what are the conditions for which >> >> > > > > setting >> >> > > > > smp_affinity for an IRQ will work ? >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > Is there any way by which I can set CPU affinity to a GPIO -> >> >> > > > > IRQ ? >> >> > > > > Whether, irq_set_affinity_hint() will work in this case ? >> >> > > > >> >> > > > IRQ affinity is only supported where interrupts are _directly_ >> >> > > > wired to >> >> > > > the GIC. It's the GIC which does the interrupt steering to the >> >> > > > CPU >> >> > > > cores. >> >> > > > >> >> > > > Interrupts on downstream interrupt controllers (such as GPCV2) >> >> > > > have no >> >> > > > ability to be directed independently to other CPUs - the only >> >> > > > possible >> >> > > > way to change the mapping is to move _all_ interrupts on that >> >> > > > controller, >> >> > > > and any downstream chained interrupts at GIC level. >> >> > > > >> >> > > > Hence why Interrupt 295 has no irq_set_affinity function: there >> >> > > > is no way >> >> > > > for the interrupt controller itself to change the affinity of >> >> > > > the input >> >> > > > interrupt. >> >> > > >> >> > > The GPCv2 though is a secondary IRQ controller which has a 1:1 >> >> > > mapping >> >> > > of its input IRQs to the upstream GIC IRQ lines. Affinity can >> >> > > thus be >> >> > > handled by forwarding the request to the GIC by >> >> > > irq_chip_set_affinity_parent(). >> >> > > >> >> > > As this is handled correctly in the upstream kernel since the >> >> > > first >> >> > > commit introducing support for the GPCv2, it seems the issue is >> >> > > only >> >> > > present in some downstream kernel. >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> > OK. Thanks so much for your reply. >> >> > >> >> > I saw some of the drivers using irq_set_affinity_hint() to force >> >> > the >> >> > IRQ affinity to a particular CPU. >> >> > This is the sample: >> >> > { >> >> > cpumask_clear(mask); >> >> > cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, mask); >> >> > irq_set_affinity_hint(irq, mask); >> >> > } >> >> > >> >> > Whether this logic will work for a particular GPIO pin ? >> >> > > > >> >> >> > >> >> > > Regards, >> >> > > Lucas ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <CAOAoqGuLffRn8SgkB0967U0Qvg8HWnxvL5Uq4EZk7Vxw1jiSJw@mail.gmail.com>]
[parent not found: <001a11c2fcca7727e504f3e8d518@google.com>]
* Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) [not found] ` <001a11c2fcca7727e504f3e8d518@google.com> @ 2014-03-06 5:03 ` Jagdish Gedia 2014-03-06 15:25 ` Alan Stern 0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread From: Jagdish Gedia @ 2014-03-06 5:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alan Stern, linux-kernel, linux-usb Hi Alan, Thanks for you informative reply. I will try your suggestion. yes, i will not get more than one wakeup per second. I have tried below things. My usb device is using the cdc-acm.c driver. inside cdc-acm.c file, static struct usb_device *usb_device; static int acm_probe(........, ....) { usb_device = interface_to_usbdev(intf); .......... } inside interrupt handler static irqhandle_t int_handler(..., ..) { usb_lock_device(usb_device); usb_remote_wakeup(usb_device); usb_unlock_device(usb_device); return IRQ_HANDLED; } but these things are not working. kernel is crashing when interrupt occurs. I have some other doubt also. 1. If usb is runtime suspended and if global suspend happens , do i need to do anything special to wakeup the usb device? 2. How can i address particularly my usb device. right now, i am using usb_device = interface_to_usbdev(intf) to get pointer to my usb device inside probe function, but probe function is getting called for every interface of the device. Is there any other way through which i can get the pointer to my usb device like i can traverse all the available usb device and on basis of vendor and product id i can address my usb device or by any other way? thanks, jagdish gediya ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) 2014-03-06 5:03 ` Jagdish Gedia @ 2014-03-06 15:25 ` Alan Stern 0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: Alan Stern @ 2014-03-06 15:25 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jagdish Gedia; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-usb On Thu, 6 Mar 2014, Jagdish Gedia wrote: > Hi Alan, > > Thanks for you informative reply. > I will try your suggestion. yes, i will not get more than one wakeup per second. > > I have tried below things. > My usb device is using the cdc-acm.c driver. > > inside cdc-acm.c file, > > static struct usb_device *usb_device; > > static int acm_probe(........, ....) > { > usb_device = interface_to_usbdev(intf); > .......... > } > > inside interrupt handler > > static irqhandle_t int_handler(..., ..) > { > usb_lock_device(usb_device); > usb_remote_wakeup(usb_device); > usb_unlock_device(usb_device); > return IRQ_HANDLED; > } > > but these things are not working. kernel is crashing when interrupt occurs. Because you didn't do what I said: Call pm_request_resume. Not usb_remote_wakeup. > I have some other doubt also. > > 1. If usb is runtime suspended and if global suspend happens , do i > need to do anything special to wakeup the usb device? No. > 2. How can i address particularly my usb device. right now, i am using > usb_device = interface_to_usbdev(intf) to get pointer to my usb device > inside probe function, That's a perfectly good way to do it. Lots of other drivers do the same thing. > but probe function is getting called for every > interface of the device. Is there any other way through which i can > get the pointer to my usb device like i can traverse all the available > usb device and on basis of vendor and product id i can address my usb > device or by any other way? You can't get the device pointer unless you have something to start from. For example, if you already have an interface pointer then you can use interface_to_usbdev. Alan Stern ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <CANQmPXicmUAVwHHs0VrbRd3MU_41wnv-Ant2r7c3FOuvEOuROQ@mail.gmail.com>]
[parent not found: <e89a8f235453a906b704c472eacd@google.com>]
* Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure) [not found] ` <e89a8f235453a906b704c472eacd@google.com> @ 2012-07-17 11:09 ` Chen 0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread From: Chen @ 2012-07-17 11:09 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel Give up this stuff then. It has gone into a wrong way. :-/ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-05-21 18:51 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 13+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2018-05-11 11:34 Not able to set smp_affinity for an IRQ on i.MX7 Pintu Kumar [not found] ` <5af57fea.1c69fb81.885f0.2377.GMRIR@mx.google.com> 2018-05-11 11:37 ` Delivery Status Notification (Failure) Pintu Kumar 2018-05-11 12:39 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2018-05-11 13:04 ` Lucas Stach 2018-05-11 14:37 ` Pintu Kumar 2018-05-14 12:12 ` Pintu Kumar 2018-05-14 13:11 ` Lucas Stach 2018-05-14 14:28 ` Pintu Kumar 2018-05-17 13:28 ` Pintu Kumar 2018-05-21 18:51 ` Pintu Kumar [not found] <CAOAoqGuLffRn8SgkB0967U0Qvg8HWnxvL5Uq4EZk7Vxw1jiSJw@mail.gmail.com> [not found] ` <001a11c2fcca7727e504f3e8d518@google.com> 2014-03-06 5:03 ` Jagdish Gedia 2014-03-06 15:25 ` Alan Stern [not found] <CANQmPXicmUAVwHHs0VrbRd3MU_41wnv-Ant2r7c3FOuvEOuROQ@mail.gmail.com> [not found] ` <e89a8f235453a906b704c472eacd@google.com> 2012-07-17 11:09 ` Chen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).