* [RFC PATCH V1 1/2] clk: use atomic runtime pm api in clk_core_is_enabled
@ 2017-12-22 9:46 Dong Aisheng
2017-12-22 9:46 ` [RFC PATCH V1 2/2] clk: add lock for clk_core_is_enabled Dong Aisheng
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Dong Aisheng @ 2017-12-22 9:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-clk
Cc: linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, sboyd, mturquette, Dong Aisheng,
Ulf Hansson, Marek Szyprowski
Current clk_pm_runtime_put is using pm_runtime_put_sync which
is not safe to be called in clk_core_is_enabled as it should
be able to run in atomic context.
Thus use pm_runtime_put instead which is atomic safe.
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Fixes: 9a34b45397e5 ("clk: Add support for runtime PM")
Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@nxp.com>
---
drivers/clk/clk.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
index 5ec5809..e24968f 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
@@ -227,7 +227,8 @@ static bool clk_core_is_enabled(struct clk_core *core)
ret = core->ops->is_enabled(core->hw);
done:
- clk_pm_runtime_put(core);
+ if (core->dev)
+ pm_runtime_put(core->dev);
return ret;
}
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [RFC PATCH V1 2/2] clk: add lock for clk_core_is_enabled
2017-12-22 9:46 [RFC PATCH V1 1/2] clk: use atomic runtime pm api in clk_core_is_enabled Dong Aisheng
@ 2017-12-22 9:46 ` Dong Aisheng
2017-12-27 1:29 ` Stephen Boyd
2017-12-22 12:51 ` [RFC PATCH V1 1/2] clk: use atomic runtime pm api in clk_core_is_enabled Ulf Hansson
2017-12-27 1:38 ` Stephen Boyd
2 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Dong Aisheng @ 2017-12-22 9:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-clk; +Cc: linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, sboyd, mturquette, Dong Aisheng
According to design doc, .is_enabled should be protected by enable lock.
Then users don't have to protect it against enable/disable operation
in clock drivers.
See: Documentation/clk.txt
"The enable lock is a spinlock and is held across calls to the .enable,
.disable and .is_enabled operations."
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@nxp.com>
---
drivers/clk/clk.c | 9 ++++++++-
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
index e24968f..d6e2d5c 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
@@ -198,14 +198,19 @@ static bool clk_core_is_prepared(struct clk_core *core)
static bool clk_core_is_enabled(struct clk_core *core)
{
+ unsigned long flags;
bool ret = false;
+ flags = clk_enable_lock();
+
/*
* .is_enabled is only mandatory for clocks that gate
* fall back to software usage counter if .is_enabled is missing
*/
- if (!core->ops->is_enabled)
+ if (!core->ops->is_enabled) {
+ clk_enable_unlock(flags);
return core->enable_count;
+ }
/*
* Check if clock controller's device is runtime active before
@@ -230,6 +235,8 @@ static bool clk_core_is_enabled(struct clk_core *core)
if (core->dev)
pm_runtime_put(core->dev);
+ clk_enable_unlock(flags);
+
return ret;
}
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC PATCH V1 1/2] clk: use atomic runtime pm api in clk_core_is_enabled
2017-12-22 9:46 [RFC PATCH V1 1/2] clk: use atomic runtime pm api in clk_core_is_enabled Dong Aisheng
2017-12-22 9:46 ` [RFC PATCH V1 2/2] clk: add lock for clk_core_is_enabled Dong Aisheng
@ 2017-12-22 12:51 ` Ulf Hansson
2017-12-27 1:38 ` Stephen Boyd
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Ulf Hansson @ 2017-12-22 12:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dong Aisheng
Cc: linux-clk, Linux Kernel Mailing List, linux-arm-kernel,
Stephen Boyd, Mike Turquette, Marek Szyprowski
On 22 December 2017 at 10:46, Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@nxp.com> wrote:
> Current clk_pm_runtime_put is using pm_runtime_put_sync which
> is not safe to be called in clk_core_is_enabled as it should
> be able to run in atomic context.
>
> Thus use pm_runtime_put instead which is atomic safe.
>
> Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>
> Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
> Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
> Fixes: 9a34b45397e5 ("clk: Add support for runtime PM")
> Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Kind regards
Uffe
> ---
> drivers/clk/clk.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> index 5ec5809..e24968f 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> @@ -227,7 +227,8 @@ static bool clk_core_is_enabled(struct clk_core *core)
>
> ret = core->ops->is_enabled(core->hw);
> done:
> - clk_pm_runtime_put(core);
> + if (core->dev)
> + pm_runtime_put(core->dev);
>
> return ret;
> }
> --
> 2.7.4
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC PATCH V1 2/2] clk: add lock for clk_core_is_enabled
2017-12-22 9:46 ` [RFC PATCH V1 2/2] clk: add lock for clk_core_is_enabled Dong Aisheng
@ 2017-12-27 1:29 ` Stephen Boyd
2018-01-17 2:57 ` Dong Aisheng
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Boyd @ 2017-12-27 1:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dong Aisheng; +Cc: linux-clk, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, mturquette
On 12/22, Dong Aisheng wrote:
> According to design doc, .is_enabled should be protected by enable lock.
> Then users don't have to protect it against enable/disable operation
> in clock drivers.
>
> See: Documentation/clk.txt
> "The enable lock is a spinlock and is held across calls to the .enable,
> .disable and .is_enabled operations."
>
> Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@nxp.com>
> ---
> drivers/clk/clk.c | 9 ++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> index e24968f..d6e2d5c 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> @@ -198,14 +198,19 @@ static bool clk_core_is_prepared(struct clk_core *core)
>
> static bool clk_core_is_enabled(struct clk_core *core)
> {
> + unsigned long flags;
> bool ret = false;
>
> + flags = clk_enable_lock();
> +
> /*
> * .is_enabled is only mandatory for clocks that gate
> * fall back to software usage counter if .is_enabled is missing
> */
> - if (!core->ops->is_enabled)
> + if (!core->ops->is_enabled) {
> + clk_enable_unlock(flags);
> return core->enable_count;
> + }
>
> /*
> * Check if clock controller's device is runtime active before
> @@ -230,6 +235,8 @@ static bool clk_core_is_enabled(struct clk_core *core)
> if (core->dev)
> pm_runtime_put(core->dev);
>
> + clk_enable_unlock(flags);
> +
> return ret;
> }
It doesn't really make any sense to hold the enable lock inside
the clk_core_is_enabled() function, unless you want to do
something else with the information of the enable state with that
lock held. Otherwise, seeing if a clk is enabled is a one-shot
read of the enabled state, which could just as easily change
after the function returns because the lock is released.
We should update the documentation.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC PATCH V1 1/2] clk: use atomic runtime pm api in clk_core_is_enabled
2017-12-22 9:46 [RFC PATCH V1 1/2] clk: use atomic runtime pm api in clk_core_is_enabled Dong Aisheng
2017-12-22 9:46 ` [RFC PATCH V1 2/2] clk: add lock for clk_core_is_enabled Dong Aisheng
2017-12-22 12:51 ` [RFC PATCH V1 1/2] clk: use atomic runtime pm api in clk_core_is_enabled Ulf Hansson
@ 2017-12-27 1:38 ` Stephen Boyd
2 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Boyd @ 2017-12-27 1:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dong Aisheng
Cc: linux-clk, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, mturquette,
Ulf Hansson, Marek Szyprowski
On 12/22, Dong Aisheng wrote:
> Current clk_pm_runtime_put is using pm_runtime_put_sync which
> is not safe to be called in clk_core_is_enabled as it should
> be able to run in atomic context.
>
> Thus use pm_runtime_put instead which is atomic safe.
>
> Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>
> Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
> Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
> Fixes: 9a34b45397e5 ("clk: Add support for runtime PM")
> Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@nxp.com>
> ---
Applied to clk-fixes
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFC PATCH V1 2/2] clk: add lock for clk_core_is_enabled
2017-12-27 1:29 ` Stephen Boyd
@ 2018-01-17 2:57 ` Dong Aisheng
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Dong Aisheng @ 2018-01-17 2:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Boyd
Cc: Dong Aisheng, linux-clk, linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel,
mturquette, linux-imx
On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 05:29:18PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 12/22, Dong Aisheng wrote:
> > According to design doc, .is_enabled should be protected by enable lock.
> > Then users don't have to protect it against enable/disable operation
> > in clock drivers.
> >
> > See: Documentation/clk.txt
> > "The enable lock is a spinlock and is held across calls to the .enable,
> > .disable and .is_enabled operations."
> >
> > Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> > Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@nxp.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/clk/clk.c | 9 ++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> > index e24968f..d6e2d5c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> > @@ -198,14 +198,19 @@ static bool clk_core_is_prepared(struct clk_core *core)
> >
> > static bool clk_core_is_enabled(struct clk_core *core)
> > {
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > bool ret = false;
> >
> > + flags = clk_enable_lock();
> > +
> > /*
> > * .is_enabled is only mandatory for clocks that gate
> > * fall back to software usage counter if .is_enabled is missing
> > */
> > - if (!core->ops->is_enabled)
> > + if (!core->ops->is_enabled) {
> > + clk_enable_unlock(flags);
> > return core->enable_count;
> > + }
> >
> > /*
> > * Check if clock controller's device is runtime active before
> > @@ -230,6 +235,8 @@ static bool clk_core_is_enabled(struct clk_core *core)
> > if (core->dev)
> > pm_runtime_put(core->dev);
> >
> > + clk_enable_unlock(flags);
> > +
> > return ret;
> > }
>
> It doesn't really make any sense to hold the enable lock inside
> the clk_core_is_enabled() function, unless you want to do
> something else with the information of the enable state with that
> lock held. Otherwise, seeing if a clk is enabled is a one-shot
> read of the enabled state, which could just as easily change
> after the function returns because the lock is released.
>
> We should update the documentation.
>
Yes, you're absolutely right.
I could draft a patch to update it later.
Thanks
Regards
Dong Aisheng
> --
> Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
> a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-clk" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2018-01-17 2:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-12-22 9:46 [RFC PATCH V1 1/2] clk: use atomic runtime pm api in clk_core_is_enabled Dong Aisheng
2017-12-22 9:46 ` [RFC PATCH V1 2/2] clk: add lock for clk_core_is_enabled Dong Aisheng
2017-12-27 1:29 ` Stephen Boyd
2018-01-17 2:57 ` Dong Aisheng
2017-12-22 12:51 ` [RFC PATCH V1 1/2] clk: use atomic runtime pm api in clk_core_is_enabled Ulf Hansson
2017-12-27 1:38 ` Stephen Boyd
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).