From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: Jerry Hoemann <Jerry.Hoemann@hpe.com>
Cc: "linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/6] libnvdimm, acpi, nfit: Add bus level dsm mask for pass thru.
Date: Sat, 1 Jul 2017 13:10:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4hP0zuZ0bdcQ5R3K2p5CRfHKXMSC_ov1D4qGXsXAQen=A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPcyv4hAMHzi7OK-z-B9LpT83Q1evH2-B-NXUMB2ebtVbjOdsg@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Jul 1, 2017 at 1:08 PM, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 1, 2017 at 12:58 PM, Jerry Hoemann <jerry.hoemann@hpe.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 08:55:22PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
>>
>> ...
>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Jerry Hoemann <jerry.hoemann@hpe.com> wrote:
>>> > + if (cmd == ND_CMD_CALL)
>>> > + dsm_mask = nd_desc->bus_dsm_mask;
>>> > desc = nd_cmd_bus_desc(cmd);
>>> > uuid = to_nfit_uuid(NFIT_DEV_BUS);
>>> > handle = adev->handle;
>>> > @@ -1613,6 +1615,7 @@ static void acpi_nfit_init_dsms(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc)
>>> > struct nvdimm_bus_descriptor *nd_desc = &acpi_desc->nd_desc;
>>> > const u8 *uuid = to_nfit_uuid(NFIT_DEV_BUS);
>>> > struct acpi_device *adev;
>>> > + unsigned long dsm_mask;
>>> > int i;
>>> >
>>> > nd_desc->cmd_mask = acpi_desc->bus_cmd_force_en;
>>> > @@ -1624,6 +1627,11 @@ static void acpi_nfit_init_dsms(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc)
>>> > if (acpi_check_dsm(adev->handle, uuid, 1, 1ULL << i))
>>> > set_bit(i, &nd_desc->cmd_mask);
>>> > set_bit(ND_CMD_CALL, &nd_desc->cmd_mask);
>>> > +
>>> > + dsm_mask = 0x3bf;
>>>
>>> I went ahead and fixed this up to use dsm_mask defined like this:
>>>
>>> + dsm_mask =
>>> + (1 << ND_CMD_ARS_CAP) |
>>> + (1 << ND_CMD_ARS_START) |
>>> + (1 << ND_CMD_ARS_STATUS) |
>>> + (1 << ND_CMD_CLEAR_ERROR) |
>>> + (1 << NFIT_CMD_TRANSLATE_SPA) |
>>> + (1 << NFIT_CMD_ARS_INJECT_SET) |
>>> + (1 << NFIT_CMD_ARS_INJECT_CLEAR) |
>>> + (1 << NFIT_CMD_ARS_INJECT_GET);
>>>
>>> This drops function number 0 which userspace has no need to call.
>>
>> Actually I like to call function 0. Its an excellent test when
>> modifying the code path as its a no side effects function whose output
>> is known in advance and instantly recognizable. I also use it when
>> testing new firmware.
>>
>> What is the downside to allowing it? What bad things happen?
>
> It allows implementations to bypass the standardization process and
> ship new root DSMs. It's always possible to patch the kernel locally
> for development, so I see no reason to ship this capability globally.
Actually, just the discovery portion does not lead to this leak, but
it's redundant when we have the 'dsm_mask' sysfs attribute.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-01 20:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-30 16:09 [PATCH v3 0/7] Enable DSM pass thru for root functions Jerry Hoemann
2017-06-30 16:09 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] libnvdimm: passthru functions clear to send Jerry Hoemann
2017-06-30 16:09 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] acpi, nfit: Enable DSM pass thru for root functions Jerry Hoemann
2017-06-30 16:09 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] libnvdimm, acpi, nfit: Add bus level dsm mask for pass thru Jerry Hoemann
2017-07-01 3:55 ` Dan Williams
2017-07-01 19:58 ` Jerry Hoemann
2017-07-01 20:08 ` Dan Williams
2017-07-01 20:10 ` Dan Williams [this message]
2017-07-01 20:38 ` Jerry Hoemann
2017-07-01 20:46 ` Dan Williams
2017-07-04 20:08 ` Jerry Hoemann
2017-07-04 20:37 ` Dan Williams
2017-07-05 15:26 ` Linda Knippers
2017-07-05 16:24 ` Jerry Hoemann
2017-07-05 16:35 ` Dan Williams
2017-07-05 23:14 ` Jerry Hoemann
2017-07-06 5:25 ` Dan Williams
2017-06-30 16:09 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] acpi, nfit: Show bus_dsm_mask in sysfs Jerry Hoemann
2017-06-30 16:09 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] libnvdimm: New ACPI 6.2 DSM functions Jerry Hoemann
2017-06-30 16:09 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] nfit allow override of root dsm mask Jerry Hoemann
2017-07-01 3:49 ` Dan Williams
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAPcyv4hP0zuZ0bdcQ5R3K2p5CRfHKXMSC_ov1D4qGXsXAQen=A@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=Jerry.Hoemann@hpe.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).