linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: Jerry Hoemann <Jerry.Hoemann@hpe.com>
Cc: "linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/6] libnvdimm, acpi, nfit: Add bus level dsm mask for pass thru.
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 22:25:39 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4jmq9O0ZxbVk_=c-DAoJ5wGwBUgJqA70T-Ke-8ABU3FDQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170705231417.GA27667@anatevka.americas.hpqcorp.net>

On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 4:14 PM, Jerry Hoemann <jerry.hoemann@hpe.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 09:35:48AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
[..]
>> It was a mistake to use _DSM for common root-level functionality, and
>> we shouldn't double down on that mistake by allowing unfettered
>
> As to the moral aspects of ACPI's decision to standardiz the DSM for NVDIMM,
> I take no position on whether it was a good thing or a bad thing; but it
> is a thing.  We need to handle it.  I see no particular benefit to
> making our own lives more difficult.

We do handle everything we need to. Making future updates move at the
same pace as standard ACPI enabing is the goal as well as not adding
any momentum to continue abusing _DSM when we should be creating named
methods for bus-level generic functionality. As a maintainer of this
subsystem I'm fine with the burden of continuing to touch the code as
the specification evolves and that stance matches standard Linux
practice.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-07-06  5:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-30 16:09 [PATCH v3 0/7] Enable DSM pass thru for root functions Jerry Hoemann
2017-06-30 16:09 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] libnvdimm: passthru functions clear to send Jerry Hoemann
2017-06-30 16:09 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] acpi, nfit: Enable DSM pass thru for root functions Jerry Hoemann
2017-06-30 16:09 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] libnvdimm, acpi, nfit: Add bus level dsm mask for pass thru Jerry Hoemann
2017-07-01  3:55   ` Dan Williams
2017-07-01 19:58     ` Jerry Hoemann
2017-07-01 20:08       ` Dan Williams
2017-07-01 20:10         ` Dan Williams
2017-07-01 20:38           ` Jerry Hoemann
2017-07-01 20:46             ` Dan Williams
2017-07-04 20:08               ` Jerry Hoemann
2017-07-04 20:37                 ` Dan Williams
2017-07-05 15:26                   ` Linda Knippers
2017-07-05 16:24                   ` Jerry Hoemann
2017-07-05 16:35                     ` Dan Williams
2017-07-05 23:14                       ` Jerry Hoemann
2017-07-06  5:25                         ` Dan Williams [this message]
2017-06-30 16:09 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] acpi, nfit: Show bus_dsm_mask in sysfs Jerry Hoemann
2017-06-30 16:09 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] libnvdimm: New ACPI 6.2 DSM functions Jerry Hoemann
2017-06-30 16:09 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] nfit allow override of root dsm mask Jerry Hoemann
2017-07-01  3:49   ` Dan Williams

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAPcyv4jmq9O0ZxbVk_=c-DAoJ5wGwBUgJqA70T-Ke-8ABU3FDQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=Jerry.Hoemann@hpe.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).