linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@wdc.com>
To: Can Guo <quic_cang@quicinc.com>,
	"bvanassche@acm.org" <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	"stanley.chu@mediatek.com" <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>,
	"adrian.hunter@intel.com" <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	"alim.akhtar@samsung.com" <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
	"beanhuo@micron.com" <beanhuo@micron.com>,
	"quic_asutoshd@quicinc.com" <quic_asutoshd@quicinc.com>,
	"quic_nguyenb@quicinc.com" <quic_nguyenb@quicinc.com>,
	"quic_ziqichen@quicinc.com" <quic_ziqichen@quicinc.com>,
	"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"kernel-team@android.com" <kernel-team@android.com>
Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	Daejun Park <daejun7.park@samsung.com>,
	Jinyoung Choi <j-young.choi@samsung.com>,
	Kiwoong Kim <kwmad.kim@samsung.com>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2] scsi: ufs: Add Multi-Circular Queue support
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2022 07:31:06 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DM6PR04MB65750EE12401C4F69B352E5CFC909@DM6PR04MB6575.namprd04.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1658214120-22772-2-git-send-email-quic_cang@quicinc.com>

> +static int ufshcd_mcq_config_resource(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> +{
> +       struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(hba->dev);
> +       struct ufshcd_res_info_t *res;
> +       struct resource *res_mem, *res_mcq;
> +       int i, ret = 0;
> +
> +       memcpy(hba->res, ufshcd_res_info, sizeof(ufshcd_res_info));
> +
> +       for (i = 0; i < RES_MAX; i++) {
> +               res = &hba->res[i];
> +
> +               res->resource = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev,
> +                                                            IORESOURCE_MEM,
> +                                                            res->name);
> +               if (!res->resource) {
> +                       dev_info(hba->dev, "Resource %s not provided\n", res-
> >name);
> +                       if (i == RES_MEM)
> +                               return -ENOMEM;
> +                       continue;
> +               } else if (i == RES_MEM) {
> +                       res_mem = res->resource;
> +                       res->base = hba->mmio_base;
> +                       continue;
> +               }
> +
> +               res->base = devm_ioremap_resource(hba->dev, res->resource);
> +               if (IS_ERR(res->base)) {
> +                       dev_err(hba->dev, "Failed to map res %s, err = %d\n",
> +                                        res->name, (int)PTR_ERR(res->base));
> +                       res->base = NULL;
> +                       ret = PTR_ERR(res->base);
> +                       goto out_err;
> +               }
> +       }
> +
> +       res = &hba->res[RES_MCQ];
> +       /* MCQ resource provided */
> +       if (res->base)
> +               goto out;
> +
> +       /* Manually allocate MCQ resource */
Did you consider to force providing the MCQ configuration?

> +       res_mcq = res->resource;
> +       res_mcq = devm_kzalloc(hba->dev, sizeof(*res_mcq), GFP_KERNEL);
> +       if (!res_mcq) {
> +               dev_err(hba->dev, "Failed to alloate MCQ resource\n");
> +               goto out_err;
> +       }
> +       res->is_alloc = true;
> +
> +       res_mcq->start = res_mem->start +
> +                        mcq_sqattr_offset(hba->mcq_capabilities);
> +       res_mcq->end = res_mcq->start + 32 * MCQ_QCFG_SIZE - 1;
Shouldn't there can be MCQCap.MAXQ queues and no more than 32?


> +int ufshcd_mcq_init(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> +{
> +       struct Scsi_Host *host = hba->host;
> +       struct ufs_hw_queue *hwq;
> +       int i, ret = 0;
> +
> +       if (!is_mcq_supported(hba))
> +               return 0;
> +
> +       ret = ufshcd_mcq_config_resource(hba);
> +       if (ret) {
> +               dev_err(hba->dev, "Failed to config MCQ resource\n");
> +               return ret;
> +       }
> +
> +       ret = ufshcd_vops_config_mcq_rop(hba);
> +       if (ret) {
> +               dev_err(hba->dev, "MCQ Runtime Operation Pointers not
> configured\n");
> +               goto out_err;
> +       }
> +
> +       hba->nr_queues[HCTX_TYPE_DEFAULT] = num_possible_cpus();
> +       hba->nr_queues[HCTX_TYPE_READ] = 0;
> +       hba->nr_queues[HCTX_TYPE_POLL] = 1;
> +
> +       for (i = 0; i < HCTX_MAX_TYPES; i++)
> +               host->nr_hw_queues += hba->nr_queues[i];
> +
> +       host->can_queue = hba->nutrs;
> +       host->cmd_per_lun = hba->nutrs;
> +
> +       /* One more reserved for dev_cmd_queue */
> +       hba->nr_hw_queues = host->nr_hw_queues + 1;
Is it possible, since MCQ memory space is *added* to the UTR & UTMR lists,
That we'll keep using the legacy doorbell for query commands?
Wouldn't it will simplify the hw_queue bookkeeping


> -#define ufshcd_hex_dump(prefix_str, buf, len) do {                       \
> -       size_t __len = (len);                                            \
> -       print_hex_dump(KERN_ERR, prefix_str,                             \
> -                      __len > 4 ? DUMP_PREFIX_OFFSET : DUMP_PREFIX_NONE,\
> -                      16, 4, buf, __len, false);                        \
> +#define ufshcd_hex_dump(prefix_str, buf, len) do {                     \
> +       size_t __len = (len);                                           \
> +                                                                       \
> +       print_hex_dump(KERN_ERR, prefix_str,                            \
> +                      __len > 4 ? DUMP_PREFIX_OFFSET : DUMP_PREFIX_NONE, \
> +                      16, 4, buf, __len, false);                       \
> +                                                                       \
>  } while (0)
Should this be part of this patch?

> +#define UFSHCD_MCQ_IO_QUEUE_OFFSET     1
Maybe add a comment above: "queue 0 is reserved for query commands" or something
That is if the query commands don't use the  legacy doorbell

> +static inline bool ufshcd_is_hwq_full(struct ufs_hw_queue *q)
> +{
> +       return (q->sq_hp_slot == ((q->sq_tp_slot + 1) %
> +                                     q->max_entries));
> +}
Isn't sq_tp_slot is already % q->max_entries ?


Thanks,
Avri

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-07-22  7:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1658214120-22772-1-git-send-email-quic_cang@quicinc.com>
2022-07-19  7:01 ` [PATCH 1/2] scsi: ufs: Add Multi-Circular Queue support Can Guo
2022-07-19 23:01   ` Bart Van Assche
2022-07-19 23:07   ` Bart Van Assche
2022-07-20 17:34     ` Asutosh Das (asd)
2022-07-20  7:57   ` kernel test robot
2022-07-20 11:41   ` kernel test robot
2022-07-20 16:36   ` kernel test robot
2022-07-22  7:31   ` Avri Altman [this message]
2022-07-22 17:35     ` Asutosh Das (asd)
2022-07-22 19:37       ` Avri Altman
2022-07-22 20:14         ` Asutosh Das (asd)
2022-07-22 20:22           ` Avri Altman
2022-07-22 21:05             ` Asutosh Das (asd)
2022-07-22 17:58     ` Bart Van Assche
2022-07-26  6:48       ` Can Guo
2022-07-22 14:42   ` Avri Altman
2022-07-23 14:59   ` Avri Altman
2022-07-26  2:55     ` Can Guo
2022-07-23 15:26   ` Avri Altman
2022-07-24  3:14     ` Bart Van Assche
2022-07-25 16:24     ` Asutosh Das (asd)
2022-07-23 20:22   ` Avri Altman
2022-07-25 16:26     ` Asutosh Das (asd)
2022-07-25 19:50       ` Avri Altman
2022-07-25 20:24         ` Asutosh Das (asd)
2022-07-23 21:23   ` Avri Altman
2022-07-24  3:15     ` Bart Van Assche
2022-07-25 16:35     ` Asutosh Das (asd)
2022-07-26 22:47       ` Bart Van Assche
2022-07-24  4:07   ` Avri Altman
2022-07-25 16:38     ` Asutosh Das (asd)
2022-07-26  6:35     ` Can Guo
2022-07-26  9:46       ` Avri Altman
2022-07-24  4:32   ` Avri Altman
2022-07-26  6:21     ` Can Guo
2022-07-24  7:21   ` Avri Altman
2022-07-24 21:54   ` Bean Huo
2022-07-25 17:35     ` Asutosh Das (asd)
2022-07-25  9:16   ` Dan Carpenter
2022-07-28 19:10   ` John Garry
2022-07-28 19:15     ` Asutosh Das (asd)
2022-07-28 20:29       ` Bart Van Assche
2022-07-28 21:07         ` Asutosh Das (asd)
2022-07-29 16:43           ` Asutosh Das (asd)
2022-07-29 18:59             ` Bart Van Assche
2022-07-28 19:38   ` Bart Van Assche
2022-07-28 20:00     ` Asutosh Das (asd)
2022-07-19  7:01 ` [PATCH 2/2] scsi: ufs-qcom: Implement three CMQ related vops Can Guo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DM6PR04MB65750EE12401C4F69B352E5CFC909@DM6PR04MB6575.namprd04.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=avri.altman@wdc.com \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
    --cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=daejun7.park@samsung.com \
    --cc=j-young.choi@samsung.com \
    --cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=kwmad.kim@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=quic_asutoshd@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_cang@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_nguyenb@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_ziqichen@quicinc.com \
    --cc=stanley.chu@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).