From: "Zulkifli, Muhammad Husaini" <muhammad.husaini.zulkifli@intel.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
Cc: "Hunter, Adrian" <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
linux-mmc <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Raja Subramanian,
Lakshmi Bai" <lakshmi.bai.raja.subramanian@intel.com>,
"Wan Mohamad,
Wan Ahmad Zainie" <wan.ahmad.zainie.wan.mohamad@intel.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 1/2] mmc: sdhci-of-arasan: Enable UHS-1 support for Keem Bay SOC
Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2020 13:28:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DM6PR11MB28768EDF354D2ED4A43B4AD2B80A0@DM6PR11MB2876.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHp75VfXe=dwbNEdUfwmMnZCkSTRH_6HjGD0MUs=GY0en4f0sw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Andy,
Thanks for the feedback. I replied inline
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
>Sent: Wednesday, October 7, 2020 4:56 PM
>To: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
>Cc: Zulkifli, Muhammad Husaini <muhammad.husaini.zulkifli@intel.com>;
>Hunter, Adrian <adrian.hunter@intel.com>; Sudeep Holla
><sudeep.holla@arm.com>; Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>; linux-mmc
><linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>; linux-arm Mailing List <linux-arm-
>kernel@lists.infradead.org>; Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-
>kernel@vger.kernel.org>; Raja Subramanian, Lakshmi Bai
><lakshmi.bai.raja.subramanian@intel.com>; Wan Mohamad, Wan Ahmad
>Zainie <wan.ahmad.zainie.wan.mohamad@intel.com>; Arnd Bergmann
><arnd@arndb.de>
>Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] mmc: sdhci-of-arasan: Enable UHS-1 support for
>Keem Bay SOC
>
>On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 11:38 AM Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
>wrote:
>> On 06. 10. 20 17:55, muhammad.husaini.zulkifli@intel.com wrote:
>
>...
>
>> > + /*
>> > + * This is like final gatekeeper. Need to ensure
>> > + changed voltage
>
>like a final
Noted. Done the changes
>
>> > + * is settled before and after turn on this bit.
>> > + */
>
>...
>
>> > + /*
>> > + * This is like final gatekeeper. Need to ensure
>> > + changed voltage
>
>Likewise.
Noted. Done the changes
>
>> > + * is settled before and after turn on this bit.
>> > + */
>
>...
>
>> > + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
>>
>> nit: I got this but as I see 3 lines below maybe would be better to
>> use it everywhere but it can be done in separate patch.
>
>In that case I think it would be better to have that patch first. It make follow up
>code cleaner.
I want to get some clarification here.
Do I need a separate patch for this struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;?
Can I embedded together with UHS patch?
>
>...
>
>> > + if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "intel,keembay-sdhci-5.1-sd")) {
>> > + struct gpio_desc *uhs;
>> > +
>> > + uhs = devm_gpiod_get_optional(dev, "uhs",
>> > + GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
>>
>> I can't see change in dt binding to record uhs gpio.
>>
>>
>> Better
>> sdhci_arasan->uhs_gpio = devm_gpiod_get_optional(dev, "uhs",
>> GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
>>
>> then you can avoid uhs variable.
>
>Actually it's readability vs. additional variable. It was my suggestion to have a
>variable to make readability better.
>Are you insisting on this change?
>
>--
>With Best Regards,
>Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-10-07 13:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-10-06 15:55 [PATCH v3 0/2] mmc: sdhci-of-arasan: Enable UHS-1 support for Keem Bay SOC muhammad.husaini.zulkifli
2020-10-06 15:55 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] " muhammad.husaini.zulkifli
2020-10-07 8:33 ` Michal Simek
2020-10-07 8:55 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-10-07 9:10 ` Michal Simek
2020-10-07 12:08 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-10-07 13:28 ` Zulkifli, Muhammad Husaini [this message]
2020-10-07 14:54 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-10-07 16:08 ` Zulkifli, Muhammad Husaini
2020-10-07 13:25 ` Zulkifli, Muhammad Husaini
2020-10-06 15:55 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] firmware: Keem Bay: Add support for Arm Trusted Firmware Service call muhammad.husaini.zulkifli
2020-10-06 20:37 ` kernel test robot
2020-10-07 3:41 ` Zulkifli, Muhammad Husaini
2020-10-07 8:20 ` Michal Simek
2020-10-07 10:10 ` Sudeep Holla
2020-10-07 13:29 ` Zulkifli, Muhammad Husaini
2020-10-07 13:21 ` Zulkifli, Muhammad Husaini
2020-10-07 13:37 ` Michal Simek
2020-10-07 13:52 ` Zulkifli, Muhammad Husaini
2020-10-07 13:58 ` Michal Simek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DM6PR11MB28768EDF354D2ED4A43B4AD2B80A0@DM6PR11MB2876.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=muhammad.husaini.zulkifli@intel.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=lakshmi.bai.raja.subramanian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michal.simek@xilinx.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=wan.ahmad.zainie.wan.mohamad@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).