Re: 2.4.19-pre3-ac1 - Quotactl patch

Re: 2.4.19-pre3-ac1 - Quotactl patch

[Nathan Scott]

On Sun, 17 Mar 2002, Alan Cox wrote:
> > 
> > You might want to upgrade to the newer one, the patch has undergone a lot
> > of changes and -ac against the XFS merge of the quotactl patch seriously
> > breaks ;-(
>
> The -ac patch is the current stable 2.4 one for 32bit uid quota. [...]
>

Shawn,

We are using Jan's latest "alpha" patches in XFS CVS (not the latest
"stable" patches), so you will need to follow the recipe I sent out
earlier (see below) for getting these patches to work together with
the quota patch in Alan's patches.  Following this recipe, nothing
should "seriously break" -- please let me know if it does -- and no
additional quota patches are necessary for XFS.

cheers.

-- 
Nathan


On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 12:59:04AM -0500, Shawn Starr wrote:
>
> I will be doing this today for -shawn10. Thank you.
>
> Shawn.
>
> On Tue, 5 Mar 2002, Nathan Scott wrote:
> > Subject: TAKE - Even newer VFS quota
> > 
> > This is Jan's latest set of VFS quota patches.  These patches (which
> > were posted to LKML on the weekend) allow the two VFS quota formats
> > and quotactl interfaces to coexist.  All seems stable on my machine.
> >
> > If you're one of the people merging XFS with Alan Cox's patches, you
> > should first reverse-apply Jan's old patches (which removes the old
> > 32 bit UID/GID quota from Alan's patches, and then apply the new code
> > from the XFS CVS tree (which "re-applies" the 32 bit UID/GID quota
> > patches, but now using Jan's new mechanisms).
> >
> > Please let us know of any quota oddities you see in the CVS tree.
> >
> > cheers.
> >

Re: 2.4.19-pre3-ac1 - Quotactl patch

[Shawn Starr]

Right, but which old patch 2.4.18-pre3-quotactl reversed against
2.4.19-pre3-ac1 doesnt go out cleanly without patch complaining about
unreversed patch problems.

Shawn.

On Mon, 18 Mar 2002, Nathan Scott wrote:

> On Sun, 17 Mar 2002, Alan Cox wrote:
> > >
> > > You might want to upgrade to the newer one, the patch has undergone a lot
> > > of changes and -ac against the XFS merge of the quotactl patch seriously
> > > breaks ;-(
> >
> > The -ac patch is the current stable 2.4 one for 32bit uid quota. [...]
> >
>
> Shawn,
>
> We are using Jan's latest "alpha" patches in XFS CVS (not the latest
> "stable" patches), so you will need to follow the recipe I sent out
> earlier (see below) for getting these patches to work together with
> the quota patch in Alan's patches.  Following this recipe, nothing
> should "seriously break" -- please let me know if it does -- and no
> additional quota patches are necessary for XFS.
>
> cheers.
>
> --
> Nathan
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 12:59:04AM -0500, Shawn Starr wrote:
> >
> > I will be doing this today for -shawn10. Thank you.
> >
> > Shawn.
> >
> > On Tue, 5 Mar 2002, Nathan Scott wrote:
> > > Subject: TAKE - Even newer VFS quota
> > >
> > > This is Jan's latest set of VFS quota patches.  These patches (which
> > > were posted to LKML on the weekend) allow the two VFS quota formats
> > > and quotactl interfaces to coexist.  All seems stable on my machine.
> > >
> > > If you're one of the people merging XFS with Alan Cox's patches, you
> > > should first reverse-apply Jan's old patches (which removes the old
> > > 32 bit UID/GID quota from Alan's patches, and then apply the new code
> > > from the XFS CVS tree (which "re-applies" the 32 bit UID/GID quota
> > > patches, but now using Jan's new mechanisms).
> > >
> > > Please let us know of any quota oddities you see in the CVS tree.
> > >
> > > cheers.
> > >
>
>

Re: 2.4.19-pre3-ac1 - Quotactl patch

[Alan Cox]

> Right, but which old patch 2.4.18-pre3-quotactl reversed against
> 2.4.19-pre3-ac1 doesnt go out cleanly without patch complaining about
> unreversed patch problems.

It isnt a single patch, its patches with further fixes on top.

Re: 2.4.19-pre3-ac1 - Quotactl patch

[Nathan Scott]

Shawn Starr wrote:
> > Right, but which old patch 2.4.18-pre3-quotactl reversed against

I assume you mean "2.4.18-pre3-ac2-quotactl.patch" from XFS CVS...
this was an incremental patch against Alan's tree, as described in
cmd/xfsmisc/README in the XFS CVS tree - it's not the right one to
be using here, since we're trying to back out the quota changes in
Alan's patches (a.k.a. Jan Kara's 32 bit uid/gid quota patches, at
ftp://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/pub/local/jack/quota/v2.4/)

> > 2.4.19-pre3-ac1 doesnt go out cleanly without patch complaining about
> > unreversed patch problems.

You would need to use the quota patch which is part of Alan's patches
in order to get back to the base kernel quota, before applying Jan's
new patches (which are patches against Linus'/Marcelo's kernels).  

Alan Cox wrote:
> It isnt a single patch, its patches with further fixes on top.

So, I'm starting to think the patch you need doesn't exist, Shawn...
Previously I thought Alan simply used Jan's quota patches directly,
but from what Alan's saying it sounds like that isn't correct and he
has additional fixes which aren't in Jan's patches. (?)

Anyway, I imagine you would still get most of the way there by reverse
applying Jan's patch (quota-patch-2.4.17-3.diff in XFS CVS) and then
fixing up any remaining issues by hand.  You just need to get back to
the base kernel quota as a starting point, because that's what Jan's
"alpha" patches are against (we use these in the XFS CVS tree now).

cheers.

-- 
Nathan

Re: [Lse-tech] Re: 10.31 second kernel compile

[Alan Cox]

> > That's not an umlaut, that's an "ae", which is a real letter in Finnish and
> > Swedish (it just _looks_ like an a with an umlaut to you uncultured
> > people), and it happens to be a letter that is just left of the ' mark on
> > a Finnish keyboard.
> 
> Hey, careful there! Those English speakers stole that name from German,  
> and in German those umlauts are real letters, too. Incidentally, my ae is  
> next to the '# key ...

There are still a couple of places you can legitimaely use an ae symbol in
English. It's not quite dead yet 8)

2.4.19-pre3-ac1 - Quotactl patch

[Shawn Starr]

You might want to upgrade to the newer one, the patch has undergone a lot
of changes and -ac against the XFS merge of the quotactl patch seriously
breaks ;-(

Shawn.

Re: 2.4.19-pre3-ac1 - Quotactl patch

[Alan Cox]

> You might want to upgrade to the newer one, the patch has undergone a lot
> of changes and -ac against the XFS merge of the quotactl patch seriously
> breaks ;-(

The -ac patch is the current stable 2.4 one for 32bit uid quota. XFS is 
a 2.5 problem so for the moment I'm not remotely bothered by it

Re: 2.4.19-pre3-ac1 - Quotactl patch

[Shawn Starr]

oh ok.
Thanks.


On Sun, 17 Mar 2002, Alan Cox wrote:

> > You might want to upgrade to the newer one, the patch has undergone a lot
> > of changes and -ac against the XFS merge of the quotactl patch seriously
> > breaks ;-(
>
> The -ac patch is the current stable 2.4 one for 32bit uid quota. XFS is
> a 2.5 problem so for the moment I'm not remotely bothered by it
>
>
>