linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "David Schwartz" <davids@webmaster.com>
To: "Linux-Kernel@Vger. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: GPL only modules
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 13:23:59 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <MDEHLPKNGKAHNMBLJOLKKEDMAHAC.davids@webmaster.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0612181242530.3479@woody.osdl.org>


> Static vs dynamic matters for whether it's an AGGREGATE work. Clearly,
> static linking aggregates the library with the other program in the same
> binary. There's no question about that. And that _does_ have meaning from
> a copyright law angle, since if you don't have permission to ship
> aggregate works under the license, then you can't ship said binary. It's
> just a non-issue in the specific case of the GPLv2.

The right to ship aggregate works is not one specifically reserved by law to
the copyright holder. It's also not clear that an aggregate work is in fact
a single work for any legal purpose other than the aggregator's claim to
copyright. All you need to ship an aggregated work is the right to ship each
of the individual works aggregated in it. For GPL'd works, you get that
right from first sale, assuming you lawfully acquired the GPL'd work in the
first place.

If the aggregation is performed in an automated and mechanized way, the
aggregate is not a single work. It's still multiple works aggregated
together. For copyright law purposes, it is not a work because no creative
input was needed to produce it beyond what was used to create the works from
which it was formed.

I recently bought two DVDs as a present for a friend of mine. I put the two
DVDs in one box and shipped them to him. Just because the two DVDs are in
one box does not make them a derivative work for copyright purposes because
no creative input went in to them. I can even staple the two DVDs together
if I want. I also don't need any special permission to ship the two of them
together to my friend, first sale covers that. The right to ship each
individual work is all that's needed to ship the aggregate.

Now, if I wanted to write my own story with elements from the content of
both DVDs, that would be a derivative work because the combination itself is
done in a creative way.

No automated, mechanical process can create a derivative work of software.
(With a few exceptions not relevant here.)

DS



  reply	other threads:[~2006-12-18 21:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-12-16 18:27 GPL only modules [was Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19] Ricardo Galli
2006-12-16 21:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-12-17  0:22   ` Ricardo Galli
2006-12-17  4:10     ` Theodore Tso
2006-12-17 13:54   ` GPL only modules Alexandre Oliva
2006-12-17 15:56     ` Ricardo Galli
2006-12-17 16:25     ` Kyle Moffett
2006-12-17 21:32       ` David Schwartz
2006-12-17 21:46         ` D. Hazelton
2006-12-18 15:47           ` Dave Neuer
2006-12-18 17:46             ` D. Hazelton
2006-12-18 21:01               ` Dave Neuer
2006-12-18 17:16           ` David Schwartz
2006-12-19  6:35             ` D. Hazelton
2006-12-19 16:39               ` David Lang
2006-12-18 19:41       ` Alexandre Oliva
2006-12-18 22:14         ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-12-19  3:42         ` D. Hazelton
2006-12-20  1:02           ` Alexandre Oliva
2006-12-20 23:28             ` Scott Preece
2006-12-17 17:59     ` Linus Torvalds
2006-12-17 22:45       ` Paul Mackerras
2006-12-18  6:50         ` Junio C Hamano
2006-12-18 23:16           ` Paul Mackerras
2006-12-18 15:38       ` Dave Neuer
2006-12-18 17:02         ` Theodore Tso
2006-12-18 17:23           ` Dave Neuer
2006-12-18 19:27       ` Alexandre Oliva
2006-12-18 19:42         ` Linus Torvalds
2006-12-18 20:37           ` Alexandre Oliva
2006-12-18 20:50             ` Linus Torvalds
2006-12-18 21:23               ` David Schwartz [this message]
2006-12-18 22:35                 ` Scott Preece
2006-12-19  1:29                   ` David Schwartz
2006-12-19 16:55                     ` Scott Preece
2006-12-20  0:09                     ` Alexandre Oliva
2006-12-20  0:06                 ` Alexandre Oliva
2006-12-18 22:06               ` Jeff V. Merkey
2006-12-18 23:28               ` Alexandre Oliva
2006-12-19  1:35                 ` David Schwartz
2006-12-19  2:38                   ` D. Hazelton
2006-12-19 12:42                     ` Horst H. von Brand
2006-12-20  0:20                   ` Alexandre Oliva
2006-12-18 23:52               ` Paul Mackerras
2006-12-18 23:59                 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-12-19  0:43                   ` Paul Mackerras
2006-12-19  1:39                 ` David Schwartz
2006-12-19  4:20               ` Daniel Barkalow
2006-12-20 19:14                 ` David Schwartz
2006-12-20 23:08                   ` Scott Preece
2006-12-20 23:26                     ` David Schwartz
2006-12-19  7:39               ` Giacomo A. Catenazzi
2006-12-19  7:40               ` Giacomo A. Catenazzi
2006-12-19  8:00           ` Sanjoy Mahajan
2006-12-19 13:09             ` Horst H. von Brand
2006-12-19 17:27               ` Sanjoy Mahajan
2006-12-20  1:06               ` Alexandre Oliva
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-12-14  0:32 GPL only modules [was Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19] Greg KH
2006-12-14  0:43 ` Jonathan Corbet
2006-12-14  0:55 ` Greg KH
2006-12-14  4:15   ` Linus Torvalds
2006-12-14 15:46     ` Jeff Garzik
2006-12-14 17:03       ` Linus Torvalds
2006-12-14 17:08         ` Chris Wedgwood
2006-12-14 17:38           ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-12-14 17:52             ` Chris Wedgwood
2006-12-14 18:09               ` Jan Engelhardt
2006-12-18 10:28                 ` GPL only modules Eric W. Biederman
2006-12-14 18:15               ` GPL only modules [was Re: [GIT PATCH] more Driver core patches for 2.6.19] Eric Sandeen
2006-12-14 18:39                 ` Chris Wedgwood
2006-12-14 19:42                   ` Scott Preece
2006-12-14 19:34                     ` Jeff V. Merkey
2006-12-15  5:28                       ` GPL only modules Alexandre Oliva

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=MDEHLPKNGKAHNMBLJOLKKEDMAHAC.davids@webmaster.com \
    --to=davids@webmaster.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).