From: Philipp Rumpf <prumpf@mandrakesoft.com>
To: Keith Owens <kaos@ocs.com.au>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.1-ac15
Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 07:36:04 -0600 (CST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.1010219073235.16489I-100000@mandrakesoft.mandrakesoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <30512.982588558@ocs3.ocs-net>
On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Keith Owens wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Feb 2001 06:15:22 -0600 (CST),
> Philipp Rumpf <prumpf@mandrakesoft.com> wrote:
> No need for a callin routine, you can get this for free as part of
> normal scheduling. The sequence goes :-
>
> if (use_count == 0) {
> module_unregister();
> wait_for_at_least_one_schedule_on_every_cpu();
> if (use_count != 0) {
> module_register(); /* lost the unregister race */
> }
> else {
> /* nobody can enter the module now */
> module_release_resources();
> unlink_module_from_list();
> wait_for_at_least_one_schedule_on_every_cpu();
> free_module_storage();
> }
> }
>
> wait_for_at_least_one_schedule_on_every_cpu() prevents the next
wait_for_at_least_one_schedule_on_every_cpu() *is* callin_other_cpus().
I agree the name isn't optimal. (and yes, you could implement it by
hacking sched.c directly, but I don't think that's necessary).
> The beauty of this approach is that the rest of the cpus can do normal
> work. No need to bring everything to a dead stop.
Which nicely avoids potential deadlocks in modules that need to initialize
on all CPUs.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-02-19 13:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-02-15 23:15 Linux 2.4.1-ac15 Alan Cox
2001-02-19 9:47 ` Philipp Rumpf
2001-02-19 11:35 ` Alan Cox
2001-02-19 11:54 ` Philipp Rumpf
2001-02-19 16:03 ` Alan Cox
2001-02-19 16:21 ` Philipp Rumpf
2001-02-19 16:27 ` Alan Cox
2001-02-19 16:34 ` Philipp Rumpf
2001-02-19 16:41 ` Alan Cox
2001-02-19 16:48 ` Philipp Rumpf
2001-02-19 17:03 ` Alan Cox
2001-02-21 3:02 ` Rusty Russell
2001-02-21 12:01 ` Alan Cox
2001-02-22 2:05 ` Rusty Russell
2001-02-22 10:22 ` Alan Cox
2001-02-23 0:01 ` Philipp Rumpf
2001-02-22 2:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-02-22 10:29 ` Alan Cox
2001-02-23 20:40 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-02-23 21:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-02-24 4:04 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-02-24 4:54 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-02-19 11:54 ` Keith Owens
2001-02-19 12:15 ` Philipp Rumpf
2001-02-19 13:15 ` Keith Owens
2001-02-19 13:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2001-02-19 21:32 ` Keith Owens
2001-02-19 13:36 ` Philipp Rumpf [this message]
2001-02-19 15:23 ` Manfred Spraul
2001-02-19 16:04 ` Alan Cox
2001-02-19 21:52 ` Keith Owens
2001-02-20 12:29 ` Philipp Rumpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.3.96.1010219073235.16489I-100000@mandrakesoft.mandrakesoft.com \
--to=prumpf@mandrakesoft.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=kaos@ocs.com.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).