Re: Monta Vista software license terms

From: Andre Hedrick <andre@linux-ide.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>,
	andrea.glorioso@binary-only.com,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Monta Vista software license terms
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2003 00:08:28 -0800 (PST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10302060007300.11024-100000@master.linux-ide.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030205181512.A24002@infradead.org>

One of the key arguements against the weakness of GPL!
Switch the to OSL and then there is legal teeth!

Later,

On Wed, 5 Feb 2003, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

> On Wed, Feb 05, 2003 at 12:57:49PM -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > I find it quite saddening that a lot of people only care about making up shit 
> > while the company in question is devoting a lot of money in salary to hire 
> > kernel developers full time whose work has always been merged to community 
> > trees so far.
> 
> Blah.  Why can't mvista put up the source to their products on some ftp
> server like suse/redhat/caldera/mandrake/etc??  That's the whole point of
> this discussion.  mvista doesn't do anything illegal, but they certainly
> don't play nice.
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> 

Andre Hedrick
LAD Storage Consulting Group