From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
Cc: Jeff Dike <jdike@karaya.com>,
<user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: user-mode port 0.44-2.4.7
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 10:32:32 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0107231031380.13231-100000@penguin.transmeta.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010723184528.R822@athlon.random>
On Mon, 23 Jul 2001, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
>
> it's the other way around, it's needed and gcc trapped a kernel bug.
No it's not.
> If the contents of memory not declared volatile changes under GCC (like
> it can happen right now for xtime since it's declared non volatile), gcc
> has the full rights to crash the kernel at runtime.
Absolutely not.
If we care abotu the thing always having the same value, we HAVE to use a
lock. "volatile" is not the answer.
Show me a place where we care.
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-07-23 17:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-07-23 5:08 user-mode port 0.44-2.4.7 Jeff Dike
2001-07-23 15:56 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-07-23 15:59 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-07-23 16:17 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-07-23 16:51 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-07-23 16:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-07-23 16:45 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-07-23 17:32 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2001-07-23 17:50 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-07-23 18:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-07-23 18:27 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-07-23 20:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-07-23 20:15 ` Jonathan Lundell
2001-07-23 22:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-07-24 3:45 ` Jonathan Lundell
2001-07-24 15:41 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-07-24 15:46 ` Alexander Viro
2001-07-24 16:01 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-07-24 16:08 ` Alexander Viro
2001-07-24 16:52 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-07-24 16:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-07-24 17:31 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-07-24 17:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-07-24 18:07 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2001-07-23 20:44 ` Chris Friesen
2001-07-23 21:11 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-07-23 21:50 ` Richard Gooch
2001-07-23 22:09 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-07-23 13:20 ` Rob Landley
2001-07-23 22:27 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-07-23 17:50 ` Rob Landley
2001-07-23 23:47 ` Richard Gooch
2001-07-24 0:04 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-07-24 9:02 ` Jan Hubicka
2001-07-24 15:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-07-24 16:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-07-25 22:49 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-07-25 23:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-07-25 23:37 ` Chris Friesen
2001-07-26 18:28 ` Jan Hubicka
2001-07-26 18:35 ` Alan Cox
2001-07-23 22:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-07-23 23:13 ` Alan Cox
2001-07-23 20:25 ` Jeff Dike
[not found] <no.id>
2001-07-23 20:57 ` Alan Cox
2001-07-23 21:14 ` Chris Friesen
2001-07-25 19:12 ` Alan Cox
2001-07-25 23:49 ` Alan Cox
2001-07-25 19:03 James W. Lake
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.33.0107231031380.13231-100000@penguin.transmeta.com \
--to=torvalds@transmeta.com \
--cc=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=jdike@karaya.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=user-mode-linux-user@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).