From: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
To: Rob Landley <landley@webofficenow.com>
Cc: Richard Gooch <rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: user-mode port 0.44-2.4.7
Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 00:27:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20010724002742.J16919@athlon.random> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0107231259520.13272-100000@penguin.transmeta.com> <200107232150.f6NLosh13126@vindaloo.ras.ucalgary.ca> <20010724000933.I16919@athlon.random> <01072309203206.00996@localhost.localdomain>
In-Reply-To: <01072309203206.00996@localhost.localdomain>; from landley@webofficenow.com on Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 09:20:32AM -0400
On Mon, Jul 23, 2001 at 09:20:32AM -0400, Rob Landley wrote:
> On Monday 23 July 2001 18:09, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
>
> > GCC will obviously _never_ introduce a BUG(), I never said that, the
> > above example is only meant to show what GCC is _allowed_ to do and what
> > we have to do to write correct C code.
>
> "Correct" C code as in portable C code? Standards compliant so it's portable
correct C code _mainly_ for gcc which is very aggressive.
Andrea
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-07-23 22:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-07-23 5:08 user-mode port 0.44-2.4.7 Jeff Dike
2001-07-23 15:56 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-07-23 15:59 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-07-23 16:17 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-07-23 16:51 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-07-23 16:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-07-23 16:45 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-07-23 17:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-07-23 17:50 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-07-23 18:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-07-23 18:27 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-07-23 20:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-07-23 20:15 ` Jonathan Lundell
2001-07-23 22:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-07-24 3:45 ` Jonathan Lundell
2001-07-24 15:41 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-07-24 15:46 ` Alexander Viro
2001-07-24 16:01 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-07-24 16:08 ` Alexander Viro
2001-07-24 16:52 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-07-24 16:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-07-24 17:31 ` Davide Libenzi
2001-07-24 17:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-07-24 18:07 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2001-07-23 20:44 ` Chris Friesen
2001-07-23 21:11 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-07-23 21:50 ` Richard Gooch
2001-07-23 22:09 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-07-23 13:20 ` Rob Landley
2001-07-23 22:27 ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
2001-07-23 17:50 ` Rob Landley
2001-07-23 23:47 ` Richard Gooch
2001-07-24 0:04 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-07-24 9:02 ` Jan Hubicka
2001-07-24 15:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-07-24 16:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-07-25 22:49 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2001-07-25 23:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-07-25 23:37 ` Chris Friesen
2001-07-26 18:28 ` Jan Hubicka
2001-07-26 18:35 ` Alan Cox
2001-07-23 22:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-07-23 23:13 ` Alan Cox
2001-07-23 20:25 ` Jeff Dike
[not found] <no.id>
2001-07-23 20:57 ` Alan Cox
2001-07-23 21:14 ` Chris Friesen
2001-07-25 19:12 ` Alan Cox
2001-07-25 23:49 ` Alan Cox
2001-07-25 19:03 James W. Lake
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20010724002742.J16919@athlon.random \
--to=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=landley@webofficenow.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).