From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
Andries Brouwer <aebr@win.tue.nl>,
William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] lockless, scalable get_pid(), for_each_process() elimination, 2.5.35-BK
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 19:38:18 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0209181936430.24794-100000@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L.0209181358470.1519-100000@duckman.distro.conectiva>
On Wed, 18 Sep 2002, Rik van Riel wrote:
> Agreed, you're right there. On the other hand, walking the threads
> _once_ will take 1.5 minutes on a 500 MHz PII (according to Ingo's
> measurements).
>
> That's about 18 times the timeout for the NMI oopser and will cause
> people real trouble.
we could fix it to 'just' lock up but still enable interrupts so that the
NMI oopser does not trigger. (we'd also have to be careful to never
write-lock the tasklist lock with IRQs disabled.) It's still a pretty lame
behavior from an OS me thinks ...
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-18 17:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-09-17 23:06 [patch] lockless, scalable get_pid(), for_each_process() elimination, 2.5.35-BK Ingo Molnar
2002-09-18 0:22 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-18 1:27 ` David S. Miller
2002-09-18 2:22 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-18 10:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-18 14:28 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-18 12:32 ` Andries Brouwer
2002-09-18 12:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-18 16:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-09-18 16:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-18 16:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-18 18:28 ` Andries Brouwer
2002-09-18 18:27 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-18 19:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-18 20:11 ` Andries Brouwer
2002-09-18 20:29 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-18 21:15 ` Andries Brouwer
2002-09-19 3:05 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-19 13:11 ` Andries Brouwer
2002-09-21 12:56 ` quadratic behaviour Andries Brouwer
2002-09-21 17:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-09-21 17:35 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-21 17:49 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-21 17:46 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-18 14:49 ` [patch] lockless, scalable get_pid(), for_each_process() elimination, 2.5.35-BK William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-18 15:01 ` Cort Dougan
2002-09-18 15:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-18 15:31 ` yodaiken
2002-09-18 15:35 ` Cort Dougan
2002-09-18 15:37 ` Rik van Riel
2002-09-18 15:50 ` Alan Cox
2002-09-18 18:31 ` Andries Brouwer
2002-09-18 18:32 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-18 16:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-09-18 16:32 ` Rik van Riel
2002-09-18 16:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-09-18 17:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-18 21:46 ` Rogier Wolff
2002-09-18 16:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-18 16:45 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-18 16:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-09-18 17:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-18 17:36 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-18 17:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-09-18 17:47 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-18 17:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-18 17:50 ` William Lee Irwin III
2002-09-18 18:07 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-19 19:27 ` Martin Mares
2002-09-17 15:31 ` Pavel Machek
2002-09-19 20:07 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-09-18 16:46 ` Rik van Riel
2002-09-18 16:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-09-18 17:00 ` Rik van Riel
2002-09-18 17:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-09-18 17:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-18 17:38 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2002-09-18 17:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-18 17:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-09-18 17:35 ` Cort Dougan
2002-09-18 17:43 ` Rik van Riel
2002-09-18 17:48 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-09-18 17:57 ` Cort Dougan
2002-09-18 18:08 ` Martin J. Bligh
2002-09-18 18:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-18 18:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-09-18 18:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-18 18:56 ` interruptible_sleep_on_timeout() and signals Imran Badr
2002-09-19 7:16 ` David Woodhouse
2002-09-18 19:53 ` [patch] lockless, scalable get_pid(), for_each_process() elimination, 2.5.35-BK Martin J. Bligh
2002-09-22 0:34 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-09-22 10:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-22 15:27 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2002-09-18 18:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-18 17:58 ` Cort Dougan
2002-09-18 18:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-18 17:54 ` Alan Cox
2002-09-18 17:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-18 18:00 ` yodaiken
2002-09-18 18:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2002-09-18 18:33 ` yodaiken
2002-09-18 16:55 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.44.0209181936430.24794-100000@localhost.localdomain \
--to=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=aebr@win.tue.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
--cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).