linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-ide@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	James Bottomley <JBottomley@parallels.com>,
	"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>,
	"Zhang, Rui" <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/6] [SCSI] runtime resume device before system suspend
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 17:54:36 -0500 (EST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1111241735300.26861-100000@netrider.rowland.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111124195703.GA6735@google.com>

On Thu, 24 Nov 2011, Tejun Heo wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 11:36:20AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> > I think this email discussion has answered his objection: The only SCSI
> > top-level driver implementing runtime suspend is sd, and sd treats
> > runtime suspend the same as system sleep.  It might be a good idea to
> > add a comment with this explanation along with the new code, however.
> 
> Hmmm... I see.  This shouldn't affect host controller states - we'll
> be skipping only the drive PM transitions, right?

Right.

>  As long as it's
> well documented, I guess it's okay but at the same time I don't think
> it's such a big deal to spin up drives when the system is entering
> hibernation from runtime powersave.  On most systems, they'll need to
> be spun up for image dump pretty soon anyway.

Hmm, that's true.  Or more precisely, they'll all be spun up for the
THAW stage of hibernation, prior to storing the memory image -- even
though the image is generally stored on only a single drive.

Okay, Ming, your most recent suggested patch can be used as is (though
adding a comment would be a good idea).  Here's my suggestion for the
patch description:

The only high-level SCSI driver that currently implements runtime PM is
sd, and sd treats runtime suspend exactly the same as the SUSPEND and
HIBERNATE stages of system sleep, but not the same as the FREEZE stage.

Therefore, when entering the SUSPEND or HIBERNATE stages of system
sleep, we can skip the callback to the driver if the device is already
in runtime suspend.  When entering the FREEZE stage, however, we should
first issue a runtime resume.  The overhead of doing this is
negligible, because a suspended drive would be spun up during the THAW
stage of hibernation anyway.

Alan Stern


  reply	other threads:[~2011-11-24 22:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-11-23  7:01 [PATCH v3 0/6] ata port runtime power management support Lin Ming
2011-11-23  7:01 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] ata: make ata port as parent device of scsi host Lin Ming
2011-11-23  7:01 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] scsi: add flag to skip the runtime PM calls on the host Lin Ming
2011-11-23  7:01 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] [SCSI] runtime resume device before system suspend Lin Ming
2011-11-23 17:02   ` Alan Stern
2011-11-24 12:21     ` Lin Ming
2011-11-24 16:36       ` Alan Stern
2011-11-24 19:57         ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-24 22:54           ` Alan Stern [this message]
2011-11-24 23:01             ` Tejun Heo
2011-11-25  0:17               ` Alan Stern
2011-11-25 13:50                 ` Lin Ming
2011-11-25 15:19                   ` Alan Stern
2011-11-23  7:01 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] [SCSI] sd: check runtime status in sd_shutdown Lin Ming
2011-11-23  7:01 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] ata: add ata port system PM callbacks Lin Ming
2011-11-23  7:01 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] ata: add ata port runtime " Lin Ming

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1111241735300.26861-100000@netrider.rowland.org \
    --to=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    --cc=JBottomley@parallels.com \
    --cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.m.lin@intel.com \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).