linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@cam.ac.uk>
To: Lee Revell <rlrevell@joe-job.com>
Cc: Olivier Galibert <galibert@pobox.com>,
	Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org>,
	Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@firmix.at>,
	Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Why the DOS has many ntfs read and write driver,but the linux can't for a long time
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 19:35:26 +0000 (GMT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0601091933020.25320@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1136827695.9957.73.camel@mindpipe>

On Mon, 9 Jan 2006, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 18:14 +0100, Olivier Galibert wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 05:53:35PM +0100, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > > Does the Windows Explorer draw icons based only on name and metadata?
> > 
> > >From what I can see it does icons on non-executable entirely based on
> > the extension and nothing else on the first pass.  Executables are
> > looked inside for an icon (and there seems to be cache effects at
> > times, especially visible on the desktop).  Then for images a second
> > pass generates icons depending on the contents (with, once again, a
> > cache hidden somewhere).
> > 
> > Not a bad strategy, too.  Doing a file(1) on everything can only be
> > slow given the random disk accesses it generates.  Maybe a file(1) as
> > a _second_ pass would work.
> 
> Gack, does Nautilus really do file(1) on everything?  That's unspeakably
> awful.

I believe it does a lot worse things.  It actually reads a picture file 
for example, then resizes the picture down to an icon sized one and then 
displays the icon, then on to the next file and for text files it 
displays the beginning of the text file in the icon, etc...  Totally 
unnecessary and brings total slowdown.  But of course as with Windows 
Explorer this is configurable and you can just use list view without 
icons...

Best regards,

	Anton
-- 
Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 at cam.ac.uk> (replace at with @)
Unix Support, Computing Service, University of Cambridge, CB2 3QH, UK
Linux NTFS maintainer / IRC: #ntfs on irc.freenode.net
WWW: http://linux-ntfs.sf.net/ & http://www-stu.christs.cam.ac.uk/~aia21/

  reply	other threads:[~2006-01-09 19:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <5t06S-7nB-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found] ` <5t34G-3Zu-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]   ` <5t5pU-7tD-37@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found]     ` <5t5JU-7Sn-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
2006-01-09 14:18       ` Why the DOS has many ntfs read and write driver,but the linux can't for a long time Robert Hancock
2006-01-09 14:28         ` Oliver Neukum
2006-01-09 15:15           ` Lee Revell
2006-01-09 16:02             ` Oliver Neukum
2006-01-09 16:04               ` Lee Revell
2006-01-09 16:14                 ` Oliver Neukum
2006-01-09 16:19                   ` Lee Revell
2006-01-09 16:29                     ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2006-01-09 16:41                       ` Lee Revell
2006-01-09 16:53                         ` Oliver Neukum
2006-01-09 16:56                           ` Lee Revell
2006-01-09 17:14                           ` Olivier Galibert
2006-01-09 17:28                             ` Lee Revell
2006-01-09 19:35                               ` Anton Altaparmakov [this message]
2006-01-10 10:32                             ` File type by extension is evil (was Re: Why the DOS has many ntfs read and write driver,but the linux can't for a long time) Bernhard R. Link
2006-01-10 20:28                               ` Lee Revell
2006-01-09 17:14                           ` Why the DOS has many ntfs read and write driver,but the linux can't for a long time Bernd Petrovitsch
2006-01-09 17:31                           ` Alan Cox
2006-01-09 16:45                             ` Jeff V. Merkey
2006-01-09 17:33                             ` Lee Revell
2006-01-09 18:11                               ` Marcin Dalecki
2006-01-09 17:45                             ` Oliver Neukum
2006-01-09 16:59                         ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2006-01-10  1:44                         ` Alistair John Strachan
2006-01-10  4:30                           ` Lee Revell
2006-01-10 10:13                             ` Jakob Oestergaard
2006-01-10 10:34                               ` Jesper Juhl
2006-01-10 23:48 Lukas Hejtmanek
2006-01-10 23:57 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-11  0:02   ` Lukas Hejtmanek
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-01-09  7:54 Boxer Gnome
2006-01-09  8:06 ` Erik Andersen
2006-01-09  8:21   ` Boxer Gnome
2006-01-09  8:53     ` Jim Crilly
2006-01-09  9:07   ` Yaroslav Rastrigin
2006-01-09 10:22     ` Alistair John Strachan
2006-01-09 11:03       ` Yaroslav Rastrigin
2006-01-09 12:45         ` CaT
2006-01-09 13:34           ` Yaroslav Rastrigin
2006-01-10 13:29             ` Helge Hafting
2006-01-10 16:29               ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-01-11  2:29             ` David Nicol
2006-01-11  2:56               ` Lee Revell
2006-01-12 18:53                 ` David Nicol
2006-01-12 21:05                   ` Lee Revell
2006-01-09 13:36         ` Kasper Sandberg
2006-01-09 13:56           ` Yaroslav Rastrigin
2006-01-09 16:07             ` Alan Cox
2006-01-09 16:15               ` Lee Revell
2006-01-09 16:34                 ` Alan Cox
2006-01-09 16:34                 ` Olivier Galibert
2006-01-09 19:24               ` Diego Calleja
2006-01-09 19:33                 ` Lee Revell
2006-01-09 13:54         ` Lee Revell
2006-01-09 14:32         ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2006-01-09 15:22         ` Denis Vlasenko
2006-01-09 19:07         ` Diego Calleja
2006-01-09 22:49         ` Dave Airlie
2006-01-10 12:00         ` Pavel Machek
2006-01-09 13:56     ` Lee Revell
2006-01-10  7:13     ` Andrew Morton
2006-01-10  7:33       ` Denis Vlasenko
2006-01-10  8:33         ` D. Hazelton
2006-01-10 10:49           ` Diego Calleja
2006-01-10 13:26           ` Denis Vlasenko
2006-01-11  4:57             ` D. Hazelton
2006-01-10  9:32         ` Yaroslav Rastrigin
2006-01-10  9:20       ` Yaroslav Rastrigin
2006-01-10 10:50         ` Diego Calleja
2006-01-09 16:32 ` Bernd Petrovitsch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0601091933020.25320@hermes-2.csi.cam.ac.uk \
    --to=aia21@cam.ac.uk \
    --cc=bernd@firmix.at \
    --cc=galibert@pobox.com \
    --cc=hancockr@shaw.ca \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oliver@neukum.org \
    --cc=rlrevell@joe-job.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).