linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] perf/test: Test case 27 broken on s390 in linux-next
@ 2021-11-03 15:52 Thomas Richter
  2021-11-06 19:32 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
  2021-11-17  9:05 ` Madhavan Srinivasan
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Richter @ 2021-11-03 15:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel, linux-perf-users, acme, sumanthk, maddy, jolsa
  Cc: svens, gor, hca, Thomas Richter

Commit 10269a2ca2b08c ("perf test sample-parsing: Add endian test for struct branch_flags")
broke the test case 27 (Sample parsing) on s390 on linux-next tree:

  # ./perf test -Fv 27
  27: Sample parsing
  --- start ---
  parsing failed for sample_type 0x800
  ---- end ----
  Sample parsing: FAILED!
  #

The cause of the failure is a wrong #define BS_EXPECTED_BE statement
in above commit.  Correct this define and the test case runs fine.

Output After:
  # ./perf test -Fv 27
  27: Sample parsing                                                  :
  --- start ---
  ---- end ----
  Sample parsing: Ok
  #

Fixes: 10269a2ca2b08c ("perf test sample-parsing: Add endian test for struct branch_flags")
Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
---
 tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c b/tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c
index c83a11514129..9c7af55b74db 100644
--- a/tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
  * These are based on the input value (213) specified
  * in branch_stack variable.
  */
-#define BS_EXPECTED_BE	0xa00d000000000000
+#define BS_EXPECTED_BE	0xa000d00000000000
 #define BS_EXPECTED_LE	0xd5000000
 #define FLAG(s)	s->branch_stack->entries[i].flags
 
-- 
2.25.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] perf/test: Test case 27 broken on s390 in linux-next
  2021-11-03 15:52 [PATCH] perf/test: Test case 27 broken on s390 in linux-next Thomas Richter
@ 2021-11-06 19:32 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
  2021-11-17  8:30   ` Madhavan Srinivasan
  2021-11-17  9:05 ` Madhavan Srinivasan
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo @ 2021-11-06 19:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Madhavan Srinivasan, Thomas Richter
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-perf-users, sumanthk, jolsa, svens, gor, hca

Em Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 04:52:15PM +0100, Thomas Richter escreveu:
> Commit 10269a2ca2b08c ("perf test sample-parsing: Add endian test for struct branch_flags")
> broke the test case 27 (Sample parsing) on s390 on linux-next tree:

Maddy,

	Can you please ack this one?

- Arnaldo
 
>   # ./perf test -Fv 27
>   27: Sample parsing
>   --- start ---
>   parsing failed for sample_type 0x800
>   ---- end ----
>   Sample parsing: FAILED!
>   #
> 
> The cause of the failure is a wrong #define BS_EXPECTED_BE statement
> in above commit.  Correct this define and the test case runs fine.
> 
> Output After:
>   # ./perf test -Fv 27
>   27: Sample parsing                                                  :
>   --- start ---
>   ---- end ----
>   Sample parsing: Ok
>   #
> 
> Fixes: 10269a2ca2b08c ("perf test sample-parsing: Add endian test for struct branch_flags")
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c b/tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c
> index c83a11514129..9c7af55b74db 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c
> @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
>   * These are based on the input value (213) specified
>   * in branch_stack variable.
>   */
> -#define BS_EXPECTED_BE	0xa00d000000000000
> +#define BS_EXPECTED_BE	0xa000d00000000000
>  #define BS_EXPECTED_LE	0xd5000000
>  #define FLAG(s)	s->branch_stack->entries[i].flags
>  
> -- 
> 2.25.1

-- 

- Arnaldo

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] perf/test: Test case 27 broken on s390 in linux-next
  2021-11-06 19:32 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
@ 2021-11-17  8:30   ` Madhavan Srinivasan
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Madhavan Srinivasan @ 2021-11-17  8:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, Thomas Richter
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-perf-users, sumanthk, jolsa, svens, gor, hca


On 11/7/21 01:02, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 04:52:15PM +0100, Thomas Richter escreveu:
>> Commit 10269a2ca2b08c ("perf test sample-parsing: Add endian test for struct branch_flags")
>> broke the test case 27 (Sample parsing) on s390 on linux-next tree:
> Maddy,
>
> 	Can you please ack this one?

Sorry i missed this completely. My bad. Will check it and will reply.

Maddy


>
> - Arnaldo
>   
>>    # ./perf test -Fv 27
>>    27: Sample parsing
>>    --- start ---
>>    parsing failed for sample_type 0x800
>>    ---- end ----
>>    Sample parsing: FAILED!
>>    #
>>
>> The cause of the failure is a wrong #define BS_EXPECTED_BE statement
>> in above commit.  Correct this define and the test case runs fine.
>>
>> Output After:
>>    # ./perf test -Fv 27
>>    27: Sample parsing                                                  :
>>    --- start ---
>>    ---- end ----
>>    Sample parsing: Ok
>>    #
>>
>> Fixes: 10269a2ca2b08c ("perf test sample-parsing: Add endian test for struct branch_flags")
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>   tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c | 2 +-
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c b/tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c
>> index c83a11514129..9c7af55b74db 100644
>> --- a/tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c
>> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c
>> @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
>>    * These are based on the input value (213) specified
>>    * in branch_stack variable.
>>    */
>> -#define BS_EXPECTED_BE	0xa00d000000000000
>> +#define BS_EXPECTED_BE	0xa000d00000000000
>>   #define BS_EXPECTED_LE	0xd5000000
>>   #define FLAG(s)	s->branch_stack->entries[i].flags
>>   
>> -- 
>> 2.25.1

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] perf/test: Test case 27 broken on s390 in linux-next
  2021-11-03 15:52 [PATCH] perf/test: Test case 27 broken on s390 in linux-next Thomas Richter
  2021-11-06 19:32 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
@ 2021-11-17  9:05 ` Madhavan Srinivasan
  2021-11-17 14:21   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Madhavan Srinivasan @ 2021-11-17  9:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Thomas Richter, linux-kernel, linux-perf-users, acme, sumanthk, jolsa
  Cc: svens, gor, hca


On 11/3/21 21:22, Thomas Richter wrote:
> Commit 10269a2ca2b08c ("perf test sample-parsing: Add endian test for struct branch_flags")
> broke the test case 27 (Sample parsing) on s390 on linux-next tree:
>
>    # ./perf test -Fv 27
>    27: Sample parsing
>    --- start ---
>    parsing failed for sample_type 0x800
>    ---- end ----
>    Sample parsing: FAILED!
>    #
>
> The cause of the failure is a wrong #define BS_EXPECTED_BE statement
> in above commit.  Correct this define and the test case runs fine.
>
> Output After:
>    # ./perf test -Fv 27
>    27: Sample parsing                                                  :
>    --- start ---
>    ---- end ----
>    Sample parsing: Ok
>    #


Hi Thomas,
Thanks for the fix. Not sure, I guess I messed up my big endian setup or 
test run I had before sending
the patch. My bad. It fails for me too, but with your patch the issue 
fixed.

Acked-and-Tested-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>


>
> Fixes: 10269a2ca2b08c ("perf test sample-parsing: Add endian test for struct branch_flags")
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>   tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c b/tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c
> index c83a11514129..9c7af55b74db 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/sample-parsing.c
> @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
>    * These are based on the input value (213) specified
>    * in branch_stack variable.
>    */
> -#define BS_EXPECTED_BE	0xa00d000000000000
> +#define BS_EXPECTED_BE	0xa000d00000000000
>   #define BS_EXPECTED_LE	0xd5000000
>   #define FLAG(s)	s->branch_stack->entries[i].flags
>   

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] perf/test: Test case 27 broken on s390 in linux-next
  2021-11-17  9:05 ` Madhavan Srinivasan
@ 2021-11-17 14:21   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo @ 2021-11-17 14:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Madhavan Srinivasan
  Cc: Thomas Richter, linux-kernel, linux-perf-users, sumanthk, jolsa,
	svens, gor, hca

Em Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 02:35:29PM +0530, Madhavan Srinivasan escreveu:
> 
> On 11/3/21 21:22, Thomas Richter wrote:
> > Commit 10269a2ca2b08c ("perf test sample-parsing: Add endian test for struct branch_flags")
> > broke the test case 27 (Sample parsing) on s390 on linux-next tree:
> > 
> >    # ./perf test -Fv 27
> >    27: Sample parsing
> >    --- start ---
> >    parsing failed for sample_type 0x800
> >    ---- end ----
> >    Sample parsing: FAILED!
> >    #
> > 
> > The cause of the failure is a wrong #define BS_EXPECTED_BE statement
> > in above commit.  Correct this define and the test case runs fine.
> > 
> > Output After:
> >    # ./perf test -Fv 27
> >    27: Sample parsing                                                  :
> >    --- start ---
> >    ---- end ----
> >    Sample parsing: Ok
> >    #
> 
> 
> Hi Thomas,
> Thanks for the fix. Not sure, I guess I messed up my big endian setup or
> test run I had before sending
> the patch. My bad. It fails for me too, but with your patch the issue fixed.
> 
> Acked-and-Tested-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>

Thanks, applied.

- Arnaldo


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2021-11-17 14:22 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2021-11-03 15:52 [PATCH] perf/test: Test case 27 broken on s390 in linux-next Thomas Richter
2021-11-06 19:32 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-11-17  8:30   ` Madhavan Srinivasan
2021-11-17  9:05 ` Madhavan Srinivasan
2021-11-17 14:21   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).