linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Huw Davies <huw@codeweavers.com>
Cc: linux kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86/vdso: Allow clock specific mult and shift values
Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2019 12:53:32 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1904141229380.4917@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190411101205.10006-3-huw@codeweavers.com>

On Thu, 11 Apr 2019, Huw Davies wrote:

CC+: Vincenzo Frascino who is working on the generic VDSO.

> This will allow clocks with different mult and shift values,
> e.g. CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW, to be supported in the vDSO.
> 
> The coarse clocks do not require these data so the values are not
> copied for these clocks.
> 
> One could add potential new values of mult and shift alongside the
> existing values in struct vsyscall_gtod_data, but it seems more
> natural to group them with the actual clock data in the basetime array
> at the expense of a few more cycles in update_vsyscall().

The few cycles are one thing. Did you verify that this does not change the
cache layout for CLOCK_MONOTONIC and CLOCK_REALTIME? Let's look:

>  struct vgtod_ts {
>  	u64		sec;
>  	u64		nsec;
> +	u32		mult;
> +	u32		shift;
>  };
>  
>  #define VGTOD_BASES	(CLOCK_TAI + 1)
> @@ -40,8 +42,6 @@ struct vsyscall_gtod_data {
>  
>  	int		vclock_mode;
>  	u64		cycle_last;
> -	u32		mult;
> -	u32		shift;
>  
>  	struct vgtod_ts	basetime[VGTOD_BASES];

The current state is:

struct vsyscall_gtod_data {
	unsigned int               seq;                  /*     0     4 */
	int                        vclock_mode;          /*     4     4 */
	u64                        cycle_last;           /*     8     8 */
	u64                        mask;                 /*    16     8 */
	u32                        mult;                 /*    24     4 */
	u32                        shift;                /*    28     4 */
	struct vgtod_ts            basetime[12];         /*    32   192 */

       basetime[CLOCK_REALTIME]		32 .. 47
       basetime[CLOCK_MONOTONIC]	48 .. 63

So with your change it looks like this:

struct vsyscall_gtod_data {
	unsigned int               seq;                  /*     0     4 */
	int                        vclock_mode;          /*     4     4 */
	u64                        cycle_last;           /*     8     8 */
	struct vgtod_ts            basetime[12];         /*    16   288 */

which makes

       basetime[CLOCK_REALTIME]		16 .. 39
       basetime[CLOCK_MONOTONIC]	40 .. 63

So it stays in the same cache line, but as we move the VDSO to generic
code, the mask field needs to stay and this will make basetime[CLOCK_MONOTONIC] 
overlap into the next cache line.

See https://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.21.1902231727060.1666@nanos.tec.linutronix.de
for an alternate solution to this problem, which avoids this and just gives
CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW a separate storage space alltogether.

Thanks,

	tglx


  reply	other threads:[~2019-04-14 10:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-11 10:12 [PATCH 0/3] x86/vdso: Add support for CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW in the vDSO Huw Davies
2019-04-11 10:12 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86/vdso: Remove unused 'mask' member Huw Davies
2019-04-14 10:36   ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-11 10:12 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86/vdso: Allow clock specific mult and shift values Huw Davies
2019-04-14 10:53   ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2019-04-15  9:30     ` Huw Davies
2019-04-15  9:51       ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-04-15 10:15         ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-04-15 12:14           ` Huw Davies
2019-05-30 14:21             ` Vincenzo Frascino
2019-04-11 10:12 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86/vdso: Add support for CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW in the vDSO Huw Davies

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.21.1904141229380.4917@nanos.tec.linutronix.de \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=huw@codeweavers.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).