From: Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] sched: Add cond_resched_rcu_lock() helper
Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 21:22:08 +0300 (EEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1305012004360.3397@ja.ssi.bg> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130501155501.GB7521@dyad.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Hello,
On Wed, 1 May 2013, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 05:22:05PM +0300, Julian Anastasov wrote:
>
> > 2. Same without need_resched because cond_resched already
> > performs the same checks:
> >
> > static void inline cond_resched_rcu_lock(void)
> > {
> > #ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU
> > rcu_read_unlock();
> > cond_resched();
> > rcu_read_lock();
> > #endif
> > }
>
> Ah so the 'problem' with this last version is that it does an unconditional /
> unnessecary rcu_read_unlock().
It is just a barrier() for the non-preempt case.
> The below would be in line with all the other cond_resched*() implementations.
...
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index 802a751..fd2c77f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -2449,6 +2449,13 @@ extern int __cond_resched_softirq(void);
> __cond_resched_softirq(); \
> })
>
> +extern int __cond_resched_rcu(void);
> +
> +#define cond_resched_rcu() ({ \
> + __might_sleep(__FILE__, __LINE__, 0); \
I see your goal. But digging into __might_sleep()
I see that rcu_sleep_check() will scream for the non-preempt
case because we are under rcu_read_lock.
What about such inline version:
static void inline cond_resched_rcu(void)
{
#ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU
rcu_read_unlock();
__might_sleep(__FILE__, __LINE__, 0);
cond_resched();
rcu_read_lock();
#else
__might_sleep(__FILE__, __LINE__, 0);
rcu_lockdep_assert(rcu_preempt_depth() == 1,
"Illegal cond_resched_rcu() context");
#endif
}
It will restrict to single RCU lock level for all
RCU implementations. But we don't have _cond_resched_rcu
helper for two reasons:
- __might_sleep uses __FILE__, __LINE__
- only cond_resched generates code, so need_resched() is
avoided
> + __cond_resched_rcu(); \
> +})
> +
> /*
> * Does a critical section need to be broken due to another
> * task waiting?: (technically does not depend on CONFIG_PREEMPT,
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 7d7901a..2b3b4e6 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -4358,6 +4358,20 @@ int __sched __cond_resched_softirq(void)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(__cond_resched_softirq);
>
> +int __sched __cond_resched_rcu(void)
> +{
> +#ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU
> + if (should_resched()) {
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> + __cond_resched();
> + rcu_read_lock();
> + return 1;
> + }
> +#endif
> + return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__cond_resched_rcu);
> +
Regards
--
Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-01 18:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-30 2:52 [PATCH v2 0/2] sched: Add cond_resched_rcu_lock() helper Simon Horman
2013-04-30 2:52 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] " Simon Horman
2013-04-30 7:12 ` Julian Anastasov
2013-04-30 7:29 ` Simon Horman
2013-04-30 7:52 ` Julian Anastasov
2013-05-01 9:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-01 12:46 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-05-01 14:32 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-05-02 7:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-01 15:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-01 15:29 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-05-01 15:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-01 16:02 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-05-01 16:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-01 17:30 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-05-01 14:22 ` Julian Anastasov
2013-05-01 15:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-01 18:22 ` Julian Anastasov [this message]
2013-05-01 19:04 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-05-02 7:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-02 10:06 ` Julian Anastasov
2013-05-02 15:54 ` Julian Anastasov
2013-05-02 17:32 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-05-02 18:55 ` Julian Anastasov
2013-05-02 19:24 ` Julian Anastasov
2013-05-02 19:34 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-05-02 20:19 ` Julian Anastasov
2013-05-02 22:31 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-05-03 7:52 ` Julian Anastasov
2013-05-03 16:30 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-05-03 17:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-03 17:34 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-05-03 18:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-03 17:47 ` Julian Anastasov
2013-05-04 7:23 ` Julian Anastasov
2013-05-04 18:03 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-04-30 2:52 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] ipvs: Use cond_resched_rcu_lock() helper when dumping connections Simon Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.1305012004360.3397@ja.ssi.bg \
--to=ja@ssi.bg \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).