linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
	Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] sched: Add cond_resched_rcu_lock() helper
Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 21:22:08 +0300 (EEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1305012004360.3397@ja.ssi.bg> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130501155501.GB7521@dyad.programming.kicks-ass.net>


	Hello,

On Wed, 1 May 2013, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 05:22:05PM +0300, Julian Anastasov wrote:
> 
> > 2. Same without need_resched because cond_resched already
> > performs the same checks:
> > 
> > static void inline cond_resched_rcu_lock(void)
> > {
> > #ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU
> > 	rcu_read_unlock();
> > 	cond_resched();
> > 	rcu_read_lock();
> > #endif
> > }
> 
> Ah so the 'problem' with this last version is that it does an unconditional /
> unnessecary rcu_read_unlock().

	It is just a barrier() for the non-preempt case.

> The below would be in line with all the other cond_resched*() implementations.

...

> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index 802a751..fd2c77f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -2449,6 +2449,13 @@ extern int __cond_resched_softirq(void);
>  	__cond_resched_softirq();					\
>  })
>  
> +extern int __cond_resched_rcu(void);
> +
> +#define cond_resched_rcu() ({			\
> +	__might_sleep(__FILE__, __LINE__, 0);	\

	I see your goal. But digging into __might_sleep()
I see that rcu_sleep_check() will scream for the non-preempt
case because we are under rcu_read_lock.

	What about such inline version:

static void inline cond_resched_rcu(void)
{
#ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU
	rcu_read_unlock();
	__might_sleep(__FILE__, __LINE__, 0);
	cond_resched();
	rcu_read_lock();
#else
	__might_sleep(__FILE__, __LINE__, 0);
	rcu_lockdep_assert(rcu_preempt_depth() == 1,
		"Illegal cond_resched_rcu() context");
#endif
}

	It will restrict to single RCU lock level for all
RCU implementations. But we don't have _cond_resched_rcu
helper for two reasons:

- __might_sleep uses __FILE__, __LINE__
- only cond_resched generates code, so need_resched() is
avoided

> +	__cond_resched_rcu();			\
> +})
> +
>  /*
>   * Does a critical section need to be broken due to another
>   * task waiting?: (technically does not depend on CONFIG_PREEMPT,
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 7d7901a..2b3b4e6 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -4358,6 +4358,20 @@ int __sched __cond_resched_softirq(void)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(__cond_resched_softirq);
>  
> +int __sched __cond_resched_rcu(void)
> +{
> +#ifndef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU
> +	if (should_resched()) {
> +		rcu_read_unlock();
> +		__cond_resched();
> +		rcu_read_lock();
> +		return 1;
> +	}
> +#endif
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__cond_resched_rcu);
> +

Regards

--
Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>

  reply	other threads:[~2013-05-01 18:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-04-30  2:52 [PATCH v2 0/2] sched: Add cond_resched_rcu_lock() helper Simon Horman
2013-04-30  2:52 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] " Simon Horman
2013-04-30  7:12   ` Julian Anastasov
2013-04-30  7:29     ` Simon Horman
2013-04-30  7:52       ` Julian Anastasov
2013-05-01  9:10         ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-01 12:46           ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-05-01 14:32             ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-05-02  7:27               ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-01 15:17             ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-01 15:29               ` Eric Dumazet
2013-05-01 15:59                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-01 16:02                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-05-01 16:57                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-01 17:30                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-05-01 14:22           ` Julian Anastasov
2013-05-01 15:55             ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-01 18:22               ` Julian Anastasov [this message]
2013-05-01 19:04                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-05-02  7:26                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-02 10:06                   ` Julian Anastasov
2013-05-02 15:54                   ` Julian Anastasov
2013-05-02 17:32                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-05-02 18:55                       ` Julian Anastasov
2013-05-02 19:24                         ` Julian Anastasov
2013-05-02 19:34                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-05-02 20:19                           ` Julian Anastasov
2013-05-02 22:31                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-05-03  7:52                               ` Julian Anastasov
2013-05-03 16:30                                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-05-03 17:04                                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-03 17:34                                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-05-03 18:09                                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-03 17:47                                   ` Julian Anastasov
2013-05-04  7:23                                   ` Julian Anastasov
2013-05-04 18:03                                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-04-30  2:52 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] ipvs: Use cond_resched_rcu_lock() helper when dumping connections Simon Horman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.1305012004360.3397@ja.ssi.bg \
    --to=ja@ssi.bg \
    --cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=horms@verge.net.au \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).