From: Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] sched: Add cond_resched_rcu_lock() helper
Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 13:06:30 +0300 (EEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1305021108430.1676@ja.ssi.bg> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130502072623.GE7521@dyad.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Hello,
On Thu, 2 May 2013, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 09:22:08PM +0300, Julian Anastasov wrote:
> > > +extern int __cond_resched_rcu(void);
> > > +
> > > +#define cond_resched_rcu() ({ \
> > > + __might_sleep(__FILE__, __LINE__, 0); \
> >
> > I see your goal. But digging into __might_sleep()
> > I see that rcu_sleep_check() will scream for the non-preempt
> > case because we are under rcu_read_lock.
>
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU
> #define PREEMPT_RCU_OFFSET 0
> #else
> #define PREEMPT_RCU_OFFSET 1
> #endif
>
> #define cond_resched_rcu() ({ \
> __might_sleep(__FILE__, __LINE__, PREEMPT_RCU_OFFSET); \
> __cond_resched_rcu(); \
> })
>
> Should work I think..
Looks like CONFIG_DEBUG_ATOMIC_SLEEP selects
CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT, so PREEMPT_RCU_OFFSET should be
1 in all cases because preempt_disable() adds 1, while
for CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU case rcu_preempt_depth() should
return 1:
#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU
#define PREEMPT_RCU_OFFSET 1
#else
#define PREEMPT_RCU_OFFSET PREEMPT_CHECK_OFFSET
#endif
Now the remaining part is to fix rcu_sleep_check() for
the non-preempt case. As there are no nesting depths in this
case, I don't see a solution so far. We can provide
some argument to rcu_preempt_sleep_check to compare
depth with preempt_count() but currently I don't know
how to differentiate cond_resched_lock() from cond_resched_rcu()
when calling __might_sleep, in both cases we provide
PREEMPT_OFFSET. May be some trick is needed here without
adding new arg to __might_sleep, so that we can properly
check for rcu_lock_map.
Regards
--
Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-02 10:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-30 2:52 [PATCH v2 0/2] sched: Add cond_resched_rcu_lock() helper Simon Horman
2013-04-30 2:52 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] " Simon Horman
2013-04-30 7:12 ` Julian Anastasov
2013-04-30 7:29 ` Simon Horman
2013-04-30 7:52 ` Julian Anastasov
2013-05-01 9:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-01 12:46 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-05-01 14:32 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-05-02 7:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-01 15:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-01 15:29 ` Eric Dumazet
2013-05-01 15:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-01 16:02 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-05-01 16:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-01 17:30 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-05-01 14:22 ` Julian Anastasov
2013-05-01 15:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-01 18:22 ` Julian Anastasov
2013-05-01 19:04 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-05-02 7:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-02 10:06 ` Julian Anastasov [this message]
2013-05-02 15:54 ` Julian Anastasov
2013-05-02 17:32 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-05-02 18:55 ` Julian Anastasov
2013-05-02 19:24 ` Julian Anastasov
2013-05-02 19:34 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-05-02 20:19 ` Julian Anastasov
2013-05-02 22:31 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-05-03 7:52 ` Julian Anastasov
2013-05-03 16:30 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-05-03 17:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-03 17:34 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-05-03 18:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2013-05-03 17:47 ` Julian Anastasov
2013-05-04 7:23 ` Julian Anastasov
2013-05-04 18:03 ` Paul E. McKenney
2013-04-30 2:52 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] ipvs: Use cond_resched_rcu_lock() helper when dumping connections Simon Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.1305021108430.1676@ja.ssi.bg \
--to=ja@ssi.bg \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).