* [Bug #14791] Something has been broken in the network stack this week
2009-12-29 15:05 2.6.33-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-12-29 15:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-29 15:09 ` [Bug #14792] Misdetection of the TV output Rafael J. Wysocki
` (34 subsequent siblings)
35 siblings, 0 replies; 98+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-12-29 15:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Ben Hutchings, David S. Miller, Delete This Account
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14791
Subject : Something has been broken in the network stack this week
Submitter : Delete This Account <speedyboyinovator@hotmail.com>
Date : 2009-12-12 13:06 (18 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14792] Misdetection of the TV output
2009-12-29 15:05 2.6.33-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-29 15:05 ` [Bug #14791] Something has been broken in the network stack this week Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-12-29 15:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-29 15:09 ` [Bug #14844] No more wireless interface eth1 after boot Rafael J. Wysocki
` (33 subsequent siblings)
35 siblings, 0 replies; 98+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-12-29 15:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Adam Jackson, Eric Anholt, Santi, Zhao Yakui
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14792
Subject : Misdetection of the TV output
Submitter : Santi <santi@agolina.net>
Date : 2009-12-12 13:28 (18 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14844] No more wireless interface eth1 after boot
2009-12-29 15:05 2.6.33-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-29 15:05 ` [Bug #14791] Something has been broken in the network stack this week Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-29 15:09 ` [Bug #14792] Misdetection of the TV output Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-12-29 15:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-29 15:09 ` [Bug #14900] drm_i915 error Rafael J. Wysocki
` (32 subsequent siblings)
35 siblings, 0 replies; 98+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-12-29 15:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Christian Casteyde
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14844
Subject : No more wireless interface eth1 after boot
Submitter : Christian Casteyde <casteyde.christian@free.fr>
Date : 2009-12-19 16:33 (11 days old)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14900] drm_i915 error
2009-12-29 15:05 2.6.33-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2009-12-29 15:09 ` [Bug #14844] No more wireless interface eth1 after boot Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-12-29 15:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-30 8:50 ` Tarkan Erimer
2009-12-29 15:09 ` [Bug #14846] acer-wmi kernel OOPS, cannot create duplicit sysfs name Rafael J. Wysocki
` (31 subsequent siblings)
35 siblings, 1 reply; 98+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-12-29 15:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Tarkan Erimer
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14900
Subject : drm_i915 error
Submitter : Tarkan Erimer <tarkane@netone.com.tr>
Date : 2009-12-14 12:50 (16 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126079504930147&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14900] drm_i915 error
2009-12-29 15:09 ` [Bug #14900] drm_i915 error Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-12-30 8:50 ` Tarkan Erimer
2009-12-30 21:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 98+ messages in thread
From: Tarkan Erimer @ 2009-12-30 8:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On 12/29/2009 05:09 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14900
> Subject : drm_i915 error
> Submitter : Tarkan Erimer <tarkane@netone.com.tr>
> Date : 2009-12-14 12:50 (16 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126079504930147&w=4
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
>
I confirm that, as of Linux-2.6.33-rc2, this regression is not
reproducible anymore. So, you can close this bug report.
Thanks and happy new year! :-)
Tarkan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14900] drm_i915 error
2009-12-30 8:50 ` Tarkan Erimer
@ 2009-12-30 21:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 98+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-12-30 21:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tarkan Erimer; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
On Wednesday 30 December 2009, Tarkan Erimer wrote:
> On 12/29/2009 05:09 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14900
> > Subject : drm_i915 error
> > Submitter : Tarkan Erimer <tarkane@netone.com.tr>
> > Date : 2009-12-14 12:50 (16 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126079504930147&w=4
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> >
> >
> I confirm that, as of Linux-2.6.33-rc2, this regression is not
> reproducible anymore. So, you can close this bug report.
Great, closed.
> Thanks and happy new year! :-)
Thanks, and happy new year to you too. :-)
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14846] acer-wmi kernel OOPS, cannot create duplicit sysfs name
2009-12-29 15:05 2.6.33-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2009-12-29 15:09 ` [Bug #14900] drm_i915 error Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-12-29 15:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-29 15:37 ` Oldrich Jedlicka
2009-12-29 15:09 ` [Bug #14887] suspend doesn't work on X200s Rafael J. Wysocki
` (30 subsequent siblings)
35 siblings, 1 reply; 98+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-12-29 15:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Carlos Corbacho, Oldřich Jedlička
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14846
Subject : acer-wmi kernel OOPS, cannot create duplicit sysfs name
Submitter : Oldřich Jedlička <oldium.pro@seznam.cz>
Date : 2009-12-19 23:44 (11 days old)
Handled-By : Carlos Corbacho <carlos@strangeworlds.co.uk>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/69795/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14846] acer-wmi kernel OOPS, cannot create duplicit sysfs name
2009-12-29 15:09 ` [Bug #14846] acer-wmi kernel OOPS, cannot create duplicit sysfs name Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-12-29 15:37 ` Oldrich Jedlicka
2009-12-29 22:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 98+ messages in thread
From: Oldrich Jedlicka @ 2009-12-29 15:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Carlos Corbacho
Hi,
On Tuesday 29 of December 2009 at 16:09:57, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
When the patch is applied to 2.6.33-rc2, the regression goes away. The patch
fixes the problem.
Cheers,
Oldrich.
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14846
> Subject : acer-wmi kernel OOPS, cannot create duplicit sysfs name
> Submitter : Oldřich Jedlička <oldium.pro@seznam.cz>
> Date : 2009-12-19 23:44 (11 days old)
> Handled-By : Carlos Corbacho <carlos@strangeworlds.co.uk>
> Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/69795/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14846] acer-wmi kernel OOPS, cannot create duplicit sysfs name
2009-12-29 15:37 ` Oldrich Jedlicka
@ 2009-12-29 22:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 98+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-12-29 22:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Oldrich Jedlicka
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Carlos Corbacho
On Tuesday 29 December 2009, Oldrich Jedlicka wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tuesday 29 of December 2009 at 16:09:57, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
>
> When the patch is applied to 2.6.33-rc2, the regression goes away. The patch
> fixes the problem.
Great, thanks for the update.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14887] suspend doesn't work on X200s
2009-12-29 15:05 2.6.33-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2009-12-29 15:09 ` [Bug #14846] acer-wmi kernel OOPS, cannot create duplicit sysfs name Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-12-29 15:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-30 11:17 ` Jens Axboe
2009-12-29 15:09 ` [Bug #14899] reiserfs: inconsistent lock state Rafael J. Wysocki
` (29 subsequent siblings)
35 siblings, 1 reply; 98+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-12-29 15:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Andrew Lutomirski
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14887
Subject : suspend doesn't work on X200s
Submitter : Andrew Lutomirski <luto@mit.edu>
Date : 2009-12-22 0:45 (8 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126144274102396&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14887] suspend doesn't work on X200s
2009-12-29 15:09 ` [Bug #14887] suspend doesn't work on X200s Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-12-30 11:17 ` Jens Axboe
2009-12-30 11:36 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2009-12-30 21:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 2 replies; 98+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2009-12-30 11:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Andrew Lutomirski
On Tue, Dec 29 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14887
> Subject : suspend doesn't work on X200s
> Submitter : Andrew Lutomirski <luto@mit.edu>
> Date : 2009-12-22 0:45 (8 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126144274102396&w=4
Works fine for me on an x200s. The only issue I seem to have is that
sometimes it suspends immediately upon resume again, presumably the lid
close event is re-triggered (or something to that extent). Apart from
that, 2.6.32 and current -git works fine for me.
--
Jens Axboe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14887] suspend doesn't work on X200s
2009-12-30 11:17 ` Jens Axboe
@ 2009-12-30 11:36 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
2009-12-30 21:44 ` Jens Axboe
2009-12-30 21:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
1 sibling, 1 reply; 98+ messages in thread
From: Mikael Abrahamsson @ 2009-12-30 11:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jens Axboe
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Andrew Lutomirski
On Wed, 30 Dec 2009, Jens Axboe wrote:
> Works fine for me on an x200s. The only issue I seem to have is that
> sometimes it suspends immediately upon resume again, presumably the lid
> close event is re-triggered (or something to that extent). Apart from
> that, 2.6.32 and current -git works fine for me.
There is an issue in 2.6.31 where it will panic (at least that's what I
think it does, please see more details in
<https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/473876>) when you have it plugged in,
suspend, un-plug the power cable, and then resume it.
According to <https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/467877>
it has something to do with "event_when_closed_battery", I haven't tested
it yet though, neither with 2.6.31 nor 2.6.32. Could be beneficial for
more people to test though.
--
Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14887] suspend doesn't work on X200s
2009-12-30 11:36 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
@ 2009-12-30 21:44 ` Jens Axboe
0 siblings, 0 replies; 98+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2009-12-30 21:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mikael Abrahamsson
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Andrew Lutomirski
On Wed, Dec 30 2009, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Dec 2009, Jens Axboe wrote:
>
>> Works fine for me on an x200s. The only issue I seem to have is that
>> sometimes it suspends immediately upon resume again, presumably the lid
>> close event is re-triggered (or something to that extent). Apart from
>> that, 2.6.32 and current -git works fine for me.
>
> There is an issue in 2.6.31 where it will panic (at least that's what I
> think it does, please see more details in
> <https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/473876>) when you have it plugged in,
> suspend, un-plug the power cable, and then resume it.
I do that all the time, not a problem here. Tried it just now and it
worked, but did the "I'll suspend immediately again". Pressing fn makes
it wake up, though.
>
> According to
> <https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/467877> it has
> something to do with "event_when_closed_battery", I haven't tested it yet
> though, neither with 2.6.31 nor 2.6.32. Could be beneficial for more
> people to test though.
>
> --
> Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se
--
Jens Axboe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14887] suspend doesn't work on X200s
2009-12-30 11:17 ` Jens Axboe
2009-12-30 11:36 ` Mikael Abrahamsson
@ 2009-12-30 21:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-02 3:17 ` Andrew Lutomirski
1 sibling, 1 reply; 98+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-12-30 21:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jens Axboe
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Andrew Lutomirski
On Wednesday 30 December 2009, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 29 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14887
> > Subject : suspend doesn't work on X200s
> > Submitter : Andrew Lutomirski <luto@mit.edu>
> > Date : 2009-12-22 0:45 (8 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126144274102396&w=4
>
> Works fine for me on an x200s. The only issue I seem to have is that
> sometimes it suspends immediately upon resume again, presumably the lid
> close event is re-triggered (or something to that extent). Apart from
> that, 2.6.32 and current -git works fine for me.
Thanks for the info.
Perhaps the bug that Andrew saw has been fixed since then.
I'm changing the stauts of the bug to "resolved". Andrew, please reopen if
you're still seeing the problem with the current Linus' tree.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14887] suspend doesn't work on X200s
2009-12-30 21:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-01-02 3:17 ` Andrew Lutomirski
2010-01-04 20:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 98+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Lutomirski @ 2010-01-02 3:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Jens Axboe, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List
I suspect it was fixed by this patch:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/12/20/88
but I can't test because the machine in question died right after I
built it a new kernel. sigh.
I'll re-post once I get the laptop working again if there's still a problem.
--Andy
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 4:39 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 December 2009, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 29 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
>> > of recent regressions.
>> >
>> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>> > from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
>> > (either way).
>> >
>> >
>> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14887
>> > Subject : suspend doesn't work on X200s
>> > Submitter : Andrew Lutomirski <luto@mit.edu>
>> > Date : 2009-12-22 0:45 (8 days old)
>> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126144274102396&w=4
>>
>> Works fine for me on an x200s. The only issue I seem to have is that
>> sometimes it suspends immediately upon resume again, presumably the lid
>> close event is re-triggered (or something to that extent). Apart from
>> that, 2.6.32 and current -git works fine for me.
>
> Thanks for the info.
>
> Perhaps the bug that Andrew saw has been fixed since then.
>
> I'm changing the stauts of the bug to "resolved". Andrew, please reopen if
> you're still seeing the problem with the current Linus' tree.
>
> Rafael
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14899] reiserfs: inconsistent lock state
2009-12-29 15:05 2.6.33-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2009-12-29 15:09 ` [Bug #14887] suspend doesn't work on X200s Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-12-29 15:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-29 16:29 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-12-29 15:09 ` [Bug #14890] [WMI?] boot hang Rafael J. Wysocki
` (28 subsequent siblings)
35 siblings, 1 reply; 98+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-12-29 15:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alexander Beregalov, Frederic Weisbecker
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14899
Subject : reiserfs: inconsistent lock state
Submitter : Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-12-11 22:06 (19 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126056920702515&w=4
Handled-By : Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/67256/
http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/67257/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14899] reiserfs: inconsistent lock state
2009-12-29 15:09 ` [Bug #14899] reiserfs: inconsistent lock state Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-12-29 16:29 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2009-12-29 21:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 98+ messages in thread
From: Frederic Weisbecker @ 2009-12-29 16:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Alexander Beregalov
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 04:09:57PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14899
> Subject : reiserfs: inconsistent lock state
> Submitter : Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com>
> Date : 2009-12-11 22:06 (19 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126056920702515&w=4
> Handled-By : Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
> Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/67256/
> http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/67257/
>
>
I think this precise one is solved. The problem is that there are other
vmalloc in the same path that also need to be fixed.
I have a pending patch for that but as there are other reiserfs lockdep
reports to be solved, I'm trying to pack all fixes in a same
set so that they can be tested using a simple merge.
For now, I guess this ticket shouldn't be closed until reporters
can test the whole.
Thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14899] reiserfs: inconsistent lock state
2009-12-29 16:29 ` Frederic Weisbecker
@ 2009-12-29 21:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 98+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-12-29 21:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Frederic Weisbecker
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Alexander Beregalov
On Tuesday 29 December 2009, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 04:09:57PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14899
> > Subject : reiserfs: inconsistent lock state
> > Submitter : Alexander Beregalov <a.beregalov@gmail.com>
> > Date : 2009-12-11 22:06 (19 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126056920702515&w=4
> > Handled-By : Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
> > Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/67256/
> > http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/67257/
> >
> >
>
>
> I think this precise one is solved. The problem is that there are other
> vmalloc in the same path that also need to be fixed.
>
> I have a pending patch for that but as there are other reiserfs lockdep
> reports to be solved, I'm trying to pack all fixes in a same
> set so that they can be tested using a simple merge.
>
> For now, I guess this ticket shouldn't be closed until reporters
> can test the whole.
OK, thanks for the update.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14890] [WMI?] boot hang
2009-12-29 15:05 2.6.33-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2009-12-29 15:09 ` [Bug #14899] reiserfs: inconsistent lock state Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-12-29 15:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-29 15:09 ` [Bug #14906] boot problem bisected to commit 99935a7a59 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (27 subsequent siblings)
35 siblings, 0 replies; 98+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-12-29 15:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Anisse Astier, Carlos Corbacho, Len Brown,
Maciej Rutecki, Randy Dunlap, Sedat Dilek
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14890
Subject : [WMI?] boot hang
Submitter : Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-12-25 10:10 (5 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=3e9b988e4edf065d39c1343937f717319b1c1065
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126173586309724&w=4
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126170348921630&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14906] boot problem bisected to commit 99935a7a59
2009-12-29 15:05 2.6.33-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2009-12-29 15:09 ` [Bug #14890] [WMI?] boot hang Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-12-29 15:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-29 21:37 ` Vincent ETIENNE
2009-12-29 15:09 ` [Bug #14901] bisected crash due to "x86: Move swiotlb initialization before dma32_free_bootmem" Rafael J. Wysocki
` (26 subsequent siblings)
35 siblings, 1 reply; 98+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-12-29 15:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Vincent ETIENNE, Yinghai Lu
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14906
Subject : boot problem bisected to commit 99935a7a59
Submitter : Vincent ETIENNE <ve@vetienne.net>
Date : 2009-12-19 16:07 (11 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126123946509316&w=4
Handled-By : Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/68941/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14906] boot problem bisected to commit 99935a7a59
2009-12-29 15:09 ` [Bug #14906] boot problem bisected to commit 99935a7a59 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-12-29 21:37 ` Vincent ETIENNE
2009-12-29 22:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 98+ messages in thread
From: Vincent ETIENNE @ 2009-12-29 21:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Yinghai Lu
Le mardi 29 décembre 2009 16:09:58, Rafael J. Wysocki a écrit :
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14906
> Subject : boot problem bisected to commit 99935a7a59
> Submitter : Vincent ETIENNE <ve@vetienne.net>
> Date : 2009-12-19 16:07 (11 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126123946509316&w=4
> Handled-By : Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
> Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/68941/
>
The proposed patch works for me but the bug is still present in 2.6.33-rc2
(patch still aply cleanly in rc2 and continue to solve the problem). Have to
wait for rc3.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14906] boot problem bisected to commit 99935a7a59
2009-12-29 21:37 ` Vincent ETIENNE
@ 2009-12-29 22:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-07 21:04 ` Vincent ETIENNE
0 siblings, 1 reply; 98+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-12-29 22:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vincent ETIENNE
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Yinghai Lu
On Tuesday 29 December 2009, Vincent ETIENNE wrote:
> Le mardi 29 décembre 2009 16:09:58, Rafael J. Wysocki a écrit :
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14906
> > Subject : boot problem bisected to commit 99935a7a59
> > Submitter : Vincent ETIENNE <ve@vetienne.net>
> > Date : 2009-12-19 16:07 (11 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126123946509316&w=4
> > Handled-By : Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
> > Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/68941/
> >
>
> The proposed patch works for me but the bug is still present in 2.6.33-rc2
> (patch still aply cleanly in rc2 and continue to solve the problem). Have to
> wait for rc3.
Thanks for the update.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14906] boot problem bisected to commit 99935a7a59
2009-12-29 22:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-01-07 21:04 ` Vincent ETIENNE
2010-01-16 9:23 ` Vincent ETIENNE
0 siblings, 1 reply; 98+ messages in thread
From: Vincent ETIENNE @ 2010-01-07 21:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Yinghai Lu
Le mardi 29 décembre 2009 23:43:09, Rafael J. Wysocki a écrit :
> On Tuesday 29 December 2009, Vincent ETIENNE wrote:
> > Le mardi 29 décembre 2009 16:09:58, Rafael J. Wysocki a écrit :
> > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > of recent regressions.
> > >
> > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me
> > > know (either way).
> > >
> > >
> > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14906
> > > Subject : boot problem bisected to commit 99935a7a59
> > > Submitter : Vincent ETIENNE <ve@vetienne.net>
> > > Date : 2009-12-19 16:07 (11 days old)
> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126123946509316&w=4
> > > Handled-By : Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
> > > Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/68941/
> >
> > The proposed patch works for me but the bug is still present in
> > 2.6.33-rc2 (patch still aply cleanly in rc2 and continue to solve the
> > problem). Have to wait for rc3.
>
> Thanks for the update.
>
> Rafael
>
Hopes not to be too much cumbersome but still no luck in 2.6.33.rc3 : the
problem is present. Nethertheless the proposed patch still cure it.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14906] boot problem bisected to commit 99935a7a59
2010-01-07 21:04 ` Vincent ETIENNE
@ 2010-01-16 9:23 ` Vincent ETIENNE
2010-01-16 21:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 98+ messages in thread
From: Vincent ETIENNE @ 2010-01-16 9:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Yinghai Lu
Le jeudi 07 janvier 2010 22:04:50, Vincent ETIENNE a écrit :
> Le mardi 29 décembre 2009 23:43:09, Rafael J. Wysocki a écrit :
> > On Tuesday 29 December 2009, Vincent ETIENNE wrote:
> > > Le mardi 29 décembre 2009 16:09:58, Rafael J. Wysocki a écrit :
> > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > > of recent regressions.
> > > >
> > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > > from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me
> > > > know (either way).
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14906
> > > > Subject : boot problem bisected to commit 99935a7a59
> > > > Submitter : Vincent ETIENNE <ve@vetienne.net>
> > > > Date : 2009-12-19 16:07 (11 days old)
> > > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126123946509316&w=4
> > > > Handled-By : Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
> > > > Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/68941/
> > >
> > > The proposed patch works for me but the bug is still present in
> > > 2.6.33-rc2 (patch still aply cleanly in rc2 and continue to solve the
> > > problem). Have to wait for rc3.
> >
> > Thanks for the update.
> >
> > Rafael
>
> Hopes not to be too much cumbersome but still no luck in 2.6.33.rc3 : the
> problem is present. Nethertheless the proposed patch still cure it.
>
Folow-up : tested in rc4. Everything is fine.
Thanks all for your help especially mister Yinghai Lu
Best regards,
Vincent
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14906] boot problem bisected to commit 99935a7a59
2010-01-16 9:23 ` Vincent ETIENNE
@ 2010-01-16 21:55 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 98+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-01-16 21:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vincent ETIENNE
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Yinghai Lu
On Saturday 16 January 2010, Vincent ETIENNE wrote:
> Le jeudi 07 janvier 2010 22:04:50, Vincent ETIENNE a écrit :
> > Le mardi 29 décembre 2009 23:43:09, Rafael J. Wysocki a écrit :
> > > On Tuesday 29 December 2009, Vincent ETIENNE wrote:
> > > > Le mardi 29 décembre 2009 16:09:58, Rafael J. Wysocki a écrit :
> > > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > > > of recent regressions.
> > > > >
> > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > > > from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me
> > > > > know (either way).
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14906
> > > > > Subject : boot problem bisected to commit 99935a7a59
> > > > > Submitter : Vincent ETIENNE <ve@vetienne.net>
> > > > > Date : 2009-12-19 16:07 (11 days old)
> > > > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126123946509316&w=4
> > > > > Handled-By : Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
> > > > > Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/68941/
> > > >
> > > > The proposed patch works for me but the bug is still present in
> > > > 2.6.33-rc2 (patch still aply cleanly in rc2 and continue to solve the
> > > > problem). Have to wait for rc3.
> > >
> > > Thanks for the update.
> > >
> > > Rafael
> >
> > Hopes not to be too much cumbersome but still no luck in 2.6.33.rc3 : the
> > problem is present. Nethertheless the proposed patch still cure it.
> >
>
> Folow-up : tested in rc4. Everything is fine.
> Thanks all for your help especially mister Yinghai Lu
Thanks, closing.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14901] bisected crash due to "x86: Move swiotlb initialization before dma32_free_bootmem"
2009-12-29 15:05 2.6.33-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2009-12-29 15:09 ` [Bug #14906] boot problem bisected to commit 99935a7a59 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-12-29 15:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-30 0:48 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-12-29 15:09 ` [Bug #14904] slab: possible recursive locking detected Rafael J. Wysocki
` (25 subsequent siblings)
35 siblings, 1 reply; 98+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-12-29 15:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, FUJITA Tomonori, Ingo Molnar, Roland Dreier,
Yinghai Lu
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14901
Subject : bisected crash due to "x86: Move swiotlb initialization before dma32_free_bootmem"
Submitter : Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>
Date : 2009-12-15 7:47 (15 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126086324302061&w=4
Handled-By : FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14901] bisected crash due to "x86: Move swiotlb initialization before dma32_free_bootmem"
2009-12-29 15:09 ` [Bug #14901] bisected crash due to "x86: Move swiotlb initialization before dma32_free_bootmem" Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-12-30 0:48 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2009-12-30 21:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 98+ messages in thread
From: FUJITA Tomonori @ 2009-12-30 0:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rjw
Cc: linux-kernel, kernel-testers, fujita.tomonori, mingo, rdreier, yinghai
On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 16:09:58 +0100 (CET)
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14901
> Subject : bisected crash due to "x86: Move swiotlb initialization before dma32_free_bootmem"
> Submitter : Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>
> Date : 2009-12-15 7:47 (15 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126086324302061&w=4
> Handled-By : FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
> Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Already fixed by the commit 186a25026c44d1bfa97671110ff14dcd0c99678e.
Thanks,
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14901] bisected crash due to "x86: Move swiotlb initialization before dma32_free_bootmem"
2009-12-30 0:48 ` FUJITA Tomonori
@ 2009-12-30 21:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 98+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-12-30 21:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: FUJITA Tomonori; +Cc: linux-kernel, kernel-testers, mingo, rdreier, yinghai
On Wednesday 30 December 2009, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 16:09:58 +0100 (CET)
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
>
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14901
> > Subject : bisected crash due to "x86: Move swiotlb initialization before dma32_free_bootmem"
> > Submitter : Roland Dreier <rdreier@cisco.com>
> > Date : 2009-12-15 7:47 (15 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126086324302061&w=4
> > Handled-By : FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
> > Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
>
> Already fixed by the commit 186a25026c44d1bfa97671110ff14dcd0c99678e.
Thanks, closed.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14904] slab: possible recursive locking detected
2009-12-29 15:05 2.6.33-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2009-12-29 15:09 ` [Bug #14901] bisected crash due to "x86: Move swiotlb initialization before dma32_free_bootmem" Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-12-29 15:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-29 15:37 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-12-29 15:09 ` [Bug #14907] Commit "kbuild: fix bzImage build for x86" breaks build Rafael J. Wysocki
` (24 subsequent siblings)
35 siblings, 1 reply; 98+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-12-29 15:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Heiko Carstens, Pekka Enberg
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14904
Subject : slab: possible recursive locking detected
Submitter : Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Date : 2009-12-18 11:58 (12 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126113754023909&w=4
Handled-By : Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14907] Commit "kbuild: fix bzImage build for x86" breaks build
2009-12-29 15:05 2.6.33-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2009-12-29 15:09 ` [Bug #14904] slab: possible recursive locking detected Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-12-29 15:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-29 15:09 ` [Bug #14910] Stable version 2.6.32.2 broke my KMS Radeon setup Rafael J. Wysocki
` (23 subsequent siblings)
35 siblings, 0 replies; 98+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-12-29 15:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Michael Tokarev, Michal Marek,
Oliver Hartkopp, Sam Ravnborg
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14907
Subject : Commit "kbuild: fix bzImage build for x86" breaks build
Submitter : Oliver Hartkopp <oliver@hartkopp.net>
Date : 2009-12-19 19:21 (11 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=4a2ff67c88211026afcbdbc190c13f705dae1b59
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126125050622195&w=4
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126114565103300&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14910] Stable version 2.6.32.2 broke my KMS Radeon setup
2009-12-29 15:05 2.6.33-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2009-12-29 15:09 ` [Bug #14907] Commit "kbuild: fix bzImage build for x86" breaks build Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-12-29 15:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-30 10:28 ` Ruud Linders
2009-12-29 15:09 ` [Bug #14909] pata_cmd64x broken in 2.6.33-rc1 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (22 subsequent siblings)
35 siblings, 1 reply; 98+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-12-29 15:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Ruud Linders
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14910
Subject : Stable version 2.6.32.2 broke my KMS Radeon setup
Submitter : Ruud Linders <kernelml@xs4all.nl>
Date : 2009-12-20 12:02 (10 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126131105608871&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14909] pata_cmd64x broken in 2.6.33-rc1
2009-12-29 15:05 2.6.33-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2009-12-29 15:09 ` [Bug #14910] Stable version 2.6.32.2 broke my KMS Radeon setup Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-12-29 15:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-29 21:07 ` Meelis Roos
2009-12-29 15:09 ` [Bug #14923] Regression in 2.6.32.2: segfault on halt Rafael J. Wysocki
` (21 subsequent siblings)
35 siblings, 1 reply; 98+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-12-29 15:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Alan Cox, Jeff Garzik, Jeff Garzik,
linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Meelis Roos
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14909
Subject : pata_cmd64x broken in 2.6.33-rc1
Submitter : Meelis Roos <mroos@linux.ee>
Date : 2009-12-19 22:23 (11 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=d43744390e460dce6626fb8de2c02a24ff650005
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126126142501594&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14923] Regression in 2.6.32.2: segfault on halt
2009-12-29 15:05 2.6.33-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2009-12-29 15:09 ` [Bug #14909] pata_cmd64x broken in 2.6.33-rc1 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-12-29 15:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-29 18:39 ` Holger Hoffstaette
2009-12-29 15:09 ` [Bug #14908] 256MB CF card no longer recognized in PCMCIA slot Rafael J. Wysocki
` (20 subsequent siblings)
35 siblings, 1 reply; 98+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-12-29 15:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Holger Hoffstaette, Mike Galbraith
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14923
Subject : Regression in 2.6.32.2: segfault on halt
Submitter : Holger Hoffstaette <holger.hoffstaette@googlemail.com>
Date : 2009-12-19 15:10 (11 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126123574505069&w=4
Handled-By : Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14908] 256MB CF card no longer recognized in PCMCIA slot
2009-12-29 15:05 2.6.33-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2009-12-29 15:09 ` [Bug #14923] Regression in 2.6.32.2: segfault on halt Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-12-29 15:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-29 15:38 ` Dominik Brodowski
2009-12-29 15:10 ` [Bug #14934] kernel crash during boot Rafael J. Wysocki
` (19 subsequent siblings)
35 siblings, 1 reply; 98+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-12-29 15:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Dominik Brodowski, Jeff Garzik, Pavel Machek
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14908
Subject : 256MB CF card no longer recognized in PCMCIA slot
Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Date : 2009-12-19 21:55 (11 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126125973632173&w=4
Handled-By : Dominik Brodowski <linux@dominikbrodowski.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14934] kernel crash during boot
2009-12-29 15:05 2.6.33-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2009-12-29 15:09 ` [Bug #14908] 256MB CF card no longer recognized in PCMCIA slot Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-12-29 15:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-29 15:10 ` [Bug #14924] Weird hard hangs when rendering 'some' web-sites in Firefox Rafael J. Wysocki
` (18 subsequent siblings)
35 siblings, 0 replies; 98+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-12-29 15:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, werner
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14934
Subject : kernel crash during boot
Submitter : werner <w.landgraf@ru.ru>
Date : 2009-12-25 5:37 (5 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126171951030608&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14924] Weird hard hangs when rendering 'some' web-sites in Firefox
2009-12-29 15:05 2.6.33-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (16 preceding siblings ...)
2009-12-29 15:10 ` [Bug #14934] kernel crash during boot Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-12-29 15:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-29 15:10 ` [Bug #14925] sky2 panic under load Rafael J. Wysocki
` (17 subsequent siblings)
35 siblings, 0 replies; 98+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-12-29 15:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, David
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14924
Subject : Weird hard hangs when rendering 'some' web-sites in Firefox
Submitter : David <david@unsolicited.net>
Date : 2009-12-21 21:53 (9 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126143375823340&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14925] sky2 panic under load
2009-12-29 15:05 2.6.33-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (17 preceding siblings ...)
2009-12-29 15:10 ` [Bug #14924] Weird hard hangs when rendering 'some' web-sites in Firefox Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-12-29 15:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-29 15:10 ` [Bug #14936] kernel BUG at fs/ext4/inode.c:1063 if attempted to use non-ext4 partition with ext4 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (16 subsequent siblings)
35 siblings, 0 replies; 98+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-12-29 15:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Berck E. Nash, Berck Nash, Daniel Hazelton,
Michael Breuer, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Hemminger
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14925
Subject : sky2 panic under load
Submitter : Berck E. Nash <flyboy@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-12-21 23:52 (9 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126143955730347&w=4
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126160893126548&w=4
Handled-By : Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14936] kernel BUG at fs/ext4/inode.c:1063 if attempted to use non-ext4 partition with ext4
2009-12-29 15:05 2.6.33-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (18 preceding siblings ...)
2009-12-29 15:10 ` [Bug #14925] sky2 panic under load Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-12-29 15:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-29 16:57 ` tytso
2009-12-29 15:10 ` [Bug #14938] Unable to handle kernel paging request in radeon_fence_signaled Rafael J. Wysocki
` (15 subsequent siblings)
35 siblings, 1 reply; 98+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-12-29 15:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Dmitry Torokhov, Gene Heskett, okias
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14936
Subject : kernel BUG at fs/ext4/inode.c:1063 if attempted to use non-ext4 partition with ext4
Submitter : Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@verizon.net>
Date : 2009-12-26 14:13 (4 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126183682330809&w=4
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126169372613898&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14936] kernel BUG at fs/ext4/inode.c:1063 if attempted to use non-ext4 partition with ext4
2009-12-29 15:10 ` [Bug #14936] kernel BUG at fs/ext4/inode.c:1063 if attempted to use non-ext4 partition with ext4 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-12-29 16:57 ` tytso
2009-12-29 21:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-30 19:01 ` tytso
0 siblings, 2 replies; 98+ messages in thread
From: tytso @ 2009-12-29 16:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Dmitry Torokhov,
Gene Heskett, okias
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 04:10:01PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14936
> Subject : kernel BUG at fs/ext4/inode.c:1063 if attempted to use non-ext4 partition with ext4
> Submitter : Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@verizon.net>
> Date : 2009-12-26 14:13 (4 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126183682330809&w=4
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126169372613898&w=4
Bisected to commit d21cd8, and reverting this commit seems to fix the
problem. The problem appeared between -rc1 and -rc2. It was a fix
that was pushed as part of a quota/ext4 fixes. For more information:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-ext4&m=126197233225936&w=2
I will take a look at this to see if I can find an easy fix;
otherwise, we'll probably want to revert commit d21cd8 before -rc3.
- Ted
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14936] kernel BUG at fs/ext4/inode.c:1063 if attempted to use non-ext4 partition with ext4
2009-12-29 16:57 ` tytso
@ 2009-12-29 21:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-30 19:01 ` tytso
1 sibling, 0 replies; 98+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-12-29 21:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: tytso
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Dmitry Torokhov,
Gene Heskett, okias
On Tuesday 29 December 2009, tytso@mit.edu wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 04:10:01PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14936
> > Subject : kernel BUG at fs/ext4/inode.c:1063 if attempted to use non-ext4 partition with ext4
> > Submitter : Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@verizon.net>
> > Date : 2009-12-26 14:13 (4 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126183682330809&w=4
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126169372613898&w=4
>
> Bisected to commit d21cd8, and reverting this commit seems to fix the
> problem. The problem appeared between -rc1 and -rc2. It was a fix
> that was pushed as part of a quota/ext4 fixes. For more information:
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-ext4&m=126197233225936&w=2
>
> I will take a look at this to see if I can find an easy fix;
> otherwise, we'll probably want to revert commit d21cd8 before -rc3.
OK, thanks for the update.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14936] kernel BUG at fs/ext4/inode.c:1063 if attempted to use non-ext4 partition with ext4
2009-12-29 16:57 ` tytso
2009-12-29 21:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-12-30 19:01 ` tytso
2009-12-30 21:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
1 sibling, 1 reply; 98+ messages in thread
From: tytso @ 2009-12-30 19:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Kernel Testers List, Dmitry Torokhov, Gene Heskett, okias
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 11:57:12AM -0500, tytso@MIT.EDU wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 04:10:01PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14936
> > Subject : kernel BUG at fs/ext4/inode.c:1063 if attempted to use non-ext4 partition with ext4
> > Submitter : Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@verizon.net>
> > Date : 2009-12-26 14:13 (4 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126183682330809&w=4
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126169372613898&w=4
>
> Bisected to commit d21cd8, and reverting this commit seems to fix the
> problem. The problem appeared between -rc1 and -rc2. It was a fix
> that was pushed as part of a quota/ext4 fixes. For more information:
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-ext4&m=126197233225936&w=2
>
> I will take a look at this to see if I can find an easy fix;
> otherwise, we'll probably want to revert commit d21cd8 before -rc3.
I'm working on a fix, and have a proposed patch. See the thread on
linux-ext4 here:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126219515024315&w=2
This patch also fixes the dq_claim_space kerneloops problem as
well....
- Ted
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14936] kernel BUG at fs/ext4/inode.c:1063 if attempted to use non-ext4 partition with ext4
2009-12-30 19:01 ` tytso
@ 2009-12-30 21:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-31 18:15 ` tytso
0 siblings, 1 reply; 98+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-12-30 21:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: tytso
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Dmitry Torokhov,
Gene Heskett, okias
On Wednesday 30 December 2009, tytso@mit.edu wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 11:57:12AM -0500, tytso@MIT.EDU wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 04:10:01PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > >
> > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14936
> > > Subject : kernel BUG at fs/ext4/inode.c:1063 if attempted to use non-ext4 partition with ext4
> > > Submitter : Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@verizon.net>
> > > Date : 2009-12-26 14:13 (4 days old)
> > > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126183682330809&w=4
> > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126169372613898&w=4
> >
> > Bisected to commit d21cd8, and reverting this commit seems to fix the
> > problem. The problem appeared between -rc1 and -rc2. It was a fix
> > that was pushed as part of a quota/ext4 fixes. For more information:
> >
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-ext4&m=126197233225936&w=2
> >
> > I will take a look at this to see if I can find an easy fix;
> > otherwise, we'll probably want to revert commit d21cd8 before -rc3.
>
> I'm working on a fix, and have a proposed patch. See the thread on
> linux-ext4 here:
>
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126219515024315&w=2
>
> This patch also fixes the dq_claim_space kerneloops problem as
> well....
Thanks, I've added your patch to the Bugzilla entry.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14936] kernel BUG at fs/ext4/inode.c:1063 if attempted to use non-ext4 partition with ext4
2009-12-30 21:52 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-12-31 18:15 ` tytso
0 siblings, 0 replies; 98+ messages in thread
From: tytso @ 2009-12-31 18:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Dmitry Torokhov,
Gene Heskett, okias
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 10:52:12PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > I'm working on a fix, and have a proposed patch. See the thread on
> > linux-ext4 here:
> >
> > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126219515024315&w=2
> >
> > This patch also fixes the dq_claim_space kerneloops problem as
> > well....
>
> Thanks, I've added your patch to the Bugzilla entry.
This patch has been merged to mainline. I'm working on improving
things so that we don't lose performance by unnecessarily forcing
delalloc blocks out to disk when the (wildly overestimated) number of
required metadata blocks approaches the user's remaining quota or
remaining free space on disk, but the fundamental fix is in mainline.
(The performance hit was something I knew about when I pushed the
patch to Linus, but after discussing things with Eric Sandeen, we
figured that for users who were converting from ext3, which didn't
have delayed allocation support at all, even with the performance hit
when the user approached the quota limit, ext4 with delalloc+quota was
still better than ext3 --- and I wanted a fix in mainline ASAP.
Fortunately, it's not going to be that hard make the required metadata
much more accurate.)
- Ted
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14938] Unable to handle kernel paging request in radeon_fence_signaled
2009-12-29 15:05 2.6.33-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (19 preceding siblings ...)
2009-12-29 15:10 ` [Bug #14936] kernel BUG at fs/ext4/inode.c:1063 if attempted to use non-ext4 partition with ext4 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-12-29 15:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-04 23:26 ` Johannes Hirte
2009-12-29 15:10 ` [Bug #14935] hd-audio0 eats 25% CPU (according to top) Rafael J. Wysocki
` (14 subsequent siblings)
35 siblings, 1 reply; 98+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-12-29 15:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, DRI, Grant Wilson
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14938
Subject : Unable to handle kernel paging request in radeon_fence_signaled
Submitter : Grant Wilson <grant.wilson@zen.co.uk>
Date : 2009-12-27 13:40 (3 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126192123104047&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14935] hd-audio0 eats 25% CPU (according to top)
2009-12-29 15:05 2.6.33-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (20 preceding siblings ...)
2009-12-29 15:10 ` [Bug #14938] Unable to handle kernel paging request in radeon_fence_signaled Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-12-29 15:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-01 23:33 ` Sergei Trofimovich
2009-12-29 15:10 ` [Bug #14937] WARNING: at kernel/lockdep.c:2830 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (13 subsequent siblings)
35 siblings, 1 reply; 98+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-12-29 15:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Sergei Trofimovich, Takashi Iwai
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14935
Subject : hd-audio0 eats 25% CPU (according to top)
Submitter : Sergei Trofimovich <slyich@gmail.com>
Date : 2009-12-25 10:21 (5 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126173644210280&w=4
Handled-By : Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/69747/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14935] hd-audio0 eats 25% CPU (according to top)
2009-12-29 15:10 ` [Bug #14935] hd-audio0 eats 25% CPU (according to top) Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-01-01 23:33 ` Sergei Trofimovich
2010-01-02 13:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 98+ messages in thread
From: Sergei Trofimovich @ 2010-01-01 23:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Takashi Iwai
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 912 bytes --]
On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 16:10:01 +0100 (CET)
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14935
> Subject : hd-audio0 eats 25% CPU (according to top)
> Submitter : Sergei Trofimovich <slyich@gmail.com>
> Date : 2009-12-25 10:21 (5 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126173644210280&w=4
> Handled-By : Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
> Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/69747/
Merged upstream as: 729d55ba972348234759f8e40abf8de020f0d505 (aka v2.6.33-rc2-2-g729d55b)
I've tested v2.6.33-rc2-249-gcd6e125 and it fixes problem.
--
Sergei
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14935] hd-audio0 eats 25% CPU (according to top)
2010-01-01 23:33 ` Sergei Trofimovich
@ 2010-01-02 13:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 98+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-01-02 13:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sergei Trofimovich
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Takashi Iwai
On Saturday 02 January 2010, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Dec 2009 16:10:01 +0100 (CET)
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
>
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14935
> > Subject : hd-audio0 eats 25% CPU (according to top)
> > Submitter : Sergei Trofimovich <slyich@gmail.com>
> > Date : 2009-12-25 10:21 (5 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126173644210280&w=4
> > Handled-By : Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
> > Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/69747/
>
> Merged upstream as: 729d55ba972348234759f8e40abf8de020f0d505 (aka v2.6.33-rc2-2-g729d55b)
> I've tested v2.6.33-rc2-249-gcd6e125 and it fixes problem.
Thanks, closed.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14937] WARNING: at kernel/lockdep.c:2830
2009-12-29 15:05 2.6.33-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (21 preceding siblings ...)
2009-12-29 15:10 ` [Bug #14935] hd-audio0 eats 25% CPU (according to top) Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-12-29 15:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-29 15:10 ` [Bug #14940] cfq-iosched: tiobench regression Rafael J. Wysocki
` (12 subsequent siblings)
35 siblings, 0 replies; 98+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-12-29 15:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Grant Wilson
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14937
Subject : WARNING: at kernel/lockdep.c:2830
Submitter : Grant Wilson <grant.wilson@zen.co.uk>
Date : 2009-12-27 13:35 (3 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126192220404829&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14940] cfq-iosched: tiobench regression
2009-12-29 15:05 2.6.33-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (22 preceding siblings ...)
2009-12-29 15:10 ` [Bug #14937] WARNING: at kernel/lockdep.c:2830 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-12-29 15:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-30 9:18 ` Jens Axboe
2009-12-29 15:10 ` [Bug #14941] agpgart-amd64 not initialized Rafael J. Wysocki
` (11 subsequent siblings)
35 siblings, 1 reply; 98+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-12-29 15:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Corrado Zoccolo, Gui Jianfeng, Jens Axboe,
Shaohua Li
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14940
Subject : cfq-iosched: tiobench regression
Submitter : Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Date : 2009-12-24 0:55 (6 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126161612401994&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14940] cfq-iosched: tiobench regression
2009-12-29 15:10 ` [Bug #14940] cfq-iosched: tiobench regression Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-12-30 9:18 ` Jens Axboe
2009-12-30 21:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 98+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2009-12-30 9:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Corrado Zoccolo,
Gui Jianfeng, Shaohua Li
On Tue, Dec 29 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14940
> Subject : cfq-iosched: tiobench regression
> Submitter : Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
> Date : 2009-12-24 0:55 (6 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126161612401994&w=4
I don't think this should be labelled as a regression. It was already
known that we'd have less throughput for the many clients cases, it was
a trade off that was made to improve latencies.
--
Jens Axboe
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14940] cfq-iosched: tiobench regression
2009-12-30 9:18 ` Jens Axboe
@ 2009-12-30 21:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-02 1:57 ` Vikram Dhillon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 98+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-12-30 21:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jens Axboe
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Corrado Zoccolo,
Gui Jianfeng, Shaohua Li
On Wednesday 30 December 2009, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 29 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14940
> > Subject : cfq-iosched: tiobench regression
> > Submitter : Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
> > Date : 2009-12-24 0:55 (6 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126161612401994&w=4
>
> I don't think this should be labelled as a regression. It was already
> known that we'd have less throughput for the many clients cases, it was
> a trade off that was made to improve latencies.
OK, I've closed it as "documented".
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14940] cfq-iosched: tiobench regression
2009-12-30 21:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-01-02 1:57 ` Vikram Dhillon
2010-01-02 13:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 98+ messages in thread
From: Vikram Dhillon @ 2010-01-02 1:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Jens Axboe, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
Corrado Zoccolo, Gui Jianfeng, Shaohua Li
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 December 2009, Jens Axboe wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 29 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
>> > of recent regressions.
>> >
>> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>> > from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
>> > (either way).
>> >
>> >
>> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14940
>> > Subject : cfq-iosched: tiobench regression
>> > Submitter : Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
>> > Date : 2009-12-24 0:55 (6 days old)
>> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126161612401994&w=4
>>
>> I don't think this should be labelled as a regression. It was already
>> known that we'd have less throughput for the many clients cases, it was
>> a trade off that was made to improve latencies.
>
> OK, I've closed it as "documented".
>
> Rafael
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
Thanks for this update, I guess we I can make like a separate category
of documented regressions because this could be helpful to other
distributions as they update to the newer kernels :D
--
Regards,
Vikram Dhillon
~~~
There are lots of Linux users who don't care how the kernel works, but
only want to use it. That is a tribute to how good Linux is.
-- Linus Torvalds
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14940] cfq-iosched: tiobench regression
2010-01-02 1:57 ` Vikram Dhillon
@ 2010-01-02 13:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 98+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-01-02 13:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vikram Dhillon
Cc: Jens Axboe, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List,
Corrado Zoccolo, Gui Jianfeng, Shaohua Li
On Saturday 02 January 2010, Vikram Dhillon wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > On Wednesday 30 December 2009, Jens Axboe wrote:
> >> On Tue, Dec 29 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> >> > of recent regressions.
> >> >
> >> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> >> > from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> >> > (either way).
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14940
> >> > Subject : cfq-iosched: tiobench regression
> >> > Submitter : Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
> >> > Date : 2009-12-24 0:55 (6 days old)
> >> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126161612401994&w=4
> >>
> >> I don't think this should be labelled as a regression. It was already
> >> known that we'd have less throughput for the many clients cases, it was
> >> a trade off that was made to improve latencies.
> >
> > OK, I've closed it as "documented".
> >
> > Rafael
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> >
>
> Thanks for this update, I guess we I can make like a separate category
> of documented regressions because this could be helpful to other
> distributions as they update to the newer kernels :D
That actually is easy to get. ;-)
* Go to bug #14885, which is a meta-bug for post-2.6.32 regressions.
* Go to the dependency tree.
* Click on "Show resolved".
* Click on "view as bug list".
* Search for "DOCU".
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14941] agpgart-amd64 not initialized
2009-12-29 15:05 2.6.33-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (23 preceding siblings ...)
2009-12-29 15:10 ` [Bug #14940] cfq-iosched: tiobench regression Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-12-29 15:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-29 15:10 ` [Bug #14942] gkrellm no longer shows all the temperatures on thinkpad x60 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (10 subsequent siblings)
35 siblings, 0 replies; 98+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-12-29 15:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, FUJITA Tomonori, Marin Mitov
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14941
Subject : agpgart-amd64 not initialized
Submitter : Marin Mitov <mitov@issp.bas.bg>
Date : 2009-12-27 15:19 (3 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126192729110083&w=4
Handled-By : FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/69956/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14942] gkrellm no longer shows all the temperatures on thinkpad x60
2009-12-29 15:05 2.6.33-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (24 preceding siblings ...)
2009-12-29 15:10 ` [Bug #14941] agpgart-amd64 not initialized Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-12-29 15:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-29 18:13 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2009-12-29 15:10 ` [Bug #14944] 2.6.32.2 SATA link detect failed, 2.6.32.1 works fine Rafael J. Wysocki
` (9 subsequent siblings)
35 siblings, 1 reply; 98+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-12-29 15:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh, Pavel Machek
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14942
Subject : gkrellm no longer shows all the temperatures on thinkpad x60
Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Date : 2009-12-27 21:57 (3 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126195107005565&w=4
Handled-By : Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14942] gkrellm no longer shows all the temperatures on thinkpad x60
2009-12-29 15:10 ` [Bug #14942] gkrellm no longer shows all the temperatures on thinkpad x60 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-12-29 18:13 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
2009-12-29 21:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 98+ messages in thread
From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh @ 2009-12-29 18:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Pavel Machek
On Tue, 29 Dec 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14942
> Subject : gkrellm no longer shows all the temperatures on thinkpad x60
> Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
> Date : 2009-12-27 21:57 (3 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126195107005565&w=4
> Handled-By : Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
Patch already in acpi-test, waiting push to mainline.
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
Henrique Holschuh
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14942] gkrellm no longer shows all the temperatures on thinkpad x60
2009-12-29 18:13 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
@ 2009-12-29 21:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-29 22:58 ` Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
0 siblings, 1 reply; 98+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-12-29 21:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Pavel Machek
On Tuesday 29 December 2009, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Dec 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14942
> > Subject : gkrellm no longer shows all the temperatures on thinkpad x60
> > Submitter : Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
> > Date : 2009-12-27 21:57 (3 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126195107005565&w=4
> > Handled-By : Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br>
>
> Patch already in acpi-test, waiting push to mainline.
Great, thanks for the update.
Is there a link to the patch so that I can put it into the bug entry?
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14944] 2.6.32.2 SATA link detect failed, 2.6.32.1 works fine
2009-12-29 15:05 2.6.33-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (25 preceding siblings ...)
2009-12-29 15:10 ` [Bug #14942] gkrellm no longer shows all the temperatures on thinkpad x60 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-12-29 15:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-30 1:09 ` fengxiangjun
2009-12-29 15:10 ` [Bug #14949] drm_vm.c:drm_mmap: possible circular locking dependency detected Rafael J. Wysocki
` (8 subsequent siblings)
35 siblings, 1 reply; 98+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-12-29 15:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, fengxiangjun, Tejun Heo
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14944
Subject : 2.6.32.2 SATA link detect failed, 2.6.32.1 works fine
Submitter : fengxiangjun <fengxiangjun@neusoft.com>
Date : 2009-12-21 11:12 (9 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126139442328314&w=4
Handled-By : Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/69746/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug #14944] 2.6.32.2 SATA link detect failed, 2.6.32.1 works fine
2009-12-29 15:10 ` [Bug #14944] 2.6.32.2 SATA link detect failed, 2.6.32.1 works fine Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-12-30 1:09 ` fengxiangjun
0 siblings, 0 replies; 98+ messages in thread
From: fengxiangjun @ 2009-12-30 1:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Kernel Testers List, Tejun Heo
Hi,
The problem has been fixed by Tejun's patch,
Thanks.
On Tue, 29 Dec 2009, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> (either way).
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14944
> Subject : 2.6.32.2 SATA link detect failed, 2.6.32.1 works fine
> Submitter : fengxiangjun <fengxiangjun@neusoft.com>
> Date : 2009-12-21 11:12 (9 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126139442328314&w=4
> Handled-By : Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/69746/
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying attachment(s)
is intended only for the use of the intended recipient and may be confidential and/or privileged of
Neusoft Corporation, its subsidiaries and/or its affiliates. If any reader of this communication is
not the intended recipient, unauthorized use, forwarding, printing, storing, disclosure or copying
is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful.If you have received this communication in error,please
immediately notify the sender by return e-mail, and delete the original message and all copies from
your system. Thank you.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14949] drm_vm.c:drm_mmap: possible circular locking dependency detected
2009-12-29 15:05 2.6.33-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (26 preceding siblings ...)
2009-12-29 15:10 ` [Bug #14944] 2.6.32.2 SATA link detect failed, 2.6.32.1 works fine Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-12-29 15:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-29 15:10 ` [Bug #14948] EHCI resume sysfs duplicates Rafael J. Wysocki
` (7 subsequent siblings)
35 siblings, 0 replies; 98+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-12-29 15:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Borislav Petkov, DRI
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14949
Subject : drm_vm.c:drm_mmap: possible circular locking dependency detected
Submitter : Borislav Petkov <petkovbb@googlemail.com>
Date : 2009-12-26 9:45 (4 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126182073616279&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14948] EHCI resume sysfs duplicates
2009-12-29 15:05 2.6.33-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (27 preceding siblings ...)
2009-12-29 15:10 ` [Bug #14949] drm_vm.c:drm_mmap: possible circular locking dependency detected Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-12-29 15:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-29 15:10 ` [Bug #14946] All kernels after 2.6.32-git10 show only 1 CPU Rafael J. Wysocki
` (6 subsequent siblings)
35 siblings, 0 replies; 98+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-12-29 15:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Borislav Petkov
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14948
Subject : EHCI resume sysfs duplicates
Submitter : Borislav Petkov <petkovbb@googlemail.com>
Date : 2009-12-26 9:36 (4 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126182020615709&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14946] All kernels after 2.6.32-git10 show only 1 CPU
2009-12-29 15:05 2.6.33-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (28 preceding siblings ...)
2009-12-29 15:10 ` [Bug #14948] EHCI resume sysfs duplicates Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-12-29 15:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-29 15:10 ` [Bug #14947] Blank screen for Intel KMS Rafael J. Wysocki
` (5 subsequent siblings)
35 siblings, 0 replies; 98+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-12-29 15:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Sid Boyce
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14946
Subject : All kernels after 2.6.32-git10 show only 1 CPU
Submitter : Sid Boyce <sboyce@blueyonder.co.uk>
Date : 2009-12-23 16:55 (7 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126158734326801&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14947] Blank screen for Intel KMS
2009-12-29 15:05 2.6.33-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (29 preceding siblings ...)
2009-12-29 15:10 ` [Bug #14946] All kernels after 2.6.32-git10 show only 1 CPU Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-12-29 15:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-29 15:10 ` [Bug #14951] lockdep possible recursive lock in slab parent->list->rlock Rafael J. Wysocki
` (4 subsequent siblings)
35 siblings, 0 replies; 98+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-12-29 15:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List
Cc: Kernel Testers List, Eric Anholt, Miguel Calleja, Zhao Yakui
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14947
Subject : Blank screen for Intel KMS
Submitter : Miguel Calleja <mcalleja1@telecable.es>
Date : 2009-12-25 13:10 (5 days old)
First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=fc816655236cd9da162356e96e74c7cfb0834d92
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126174693019098&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14951] lockdep possible recursive lock in slab parent->list->rlock
2009-12-29 15:05 2.6.33-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (30 preceding siblings ...)
2009-12-29 15:10 ` [Bug #14947] Blank screen for Intel KMS Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-12-29 15:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-03 11:36 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-12-29 15:10 ` [Bug #14950] tbench regression with 2.6.33-rc1 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (3 subsequent siblings)
35 siblings, 1 reply; 98+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-12-29 15:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Andi Kleen, Pekka Enberg
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14951
Subject : lockdep possible recursive lock in slab parent->list->rlock
Submitter : Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Date : 2009-12-27 12:06 (3 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126191560531463&w=4
Handled-By : Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
Patch : http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/69829/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14950] tbench regression with 2.6.33-rc1
2009-12-29 15:05 2.6.33-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (31 preceding siblings ...)
2009-12-29 15:10 ` [Bug #14951] lockdep possible recursive lock in slab parent->list->rlock Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-12-29 15:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-12-29 15:10 ` [Bug #14952] instant reboot on loading 2.6.33-rc on Celeron 900 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (2 subsequent siblings)
35 siblings, 0 replies; 98+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-12-29 15:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Lin Ming, Mike Galbraith
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14950
Subject : tbench regression with 2.6.33-rc1
Submitter : Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Date : 2009-12-25 11:11 (5 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126174044213172&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* [Bug #14952] instant reboot on loading 2.6.33-rc on Celeron 900
2009-12-29 15:05 2.6.33-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (32 preceding siblings ...)
2009-12-29 15:10 ` [Bug #14950] tbench regression with 2.6.33-rc1 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-12-29 15:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-14 10:51 ` Meelis Roos
2009-12-29 20:00 ` 2.6.33-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafał Miłecki
2010-01-16 17:48 ` m.s.tsirkin
35 siblings, 1 reply; 98+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-12-29 15:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List; +Cc: Kernel Testers List, Meelis Roos
This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
of recent regressions.
The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
(either way).
Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14952
Subject : instant reboot on loading 2.6.33-rc on Celeron 900
Submitter : Meelis Roos <mroos@linux.ee>
Date : 2009-12-29 13:57 (1 days old)
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126209508500393&w=4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.33-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.32
2009-12-29 15:05 2.6.33-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (33 preceding siblings ...)
2009-12-29 15:10 ` [Bug #14952] instant reboot on loading 2.6.33-rc on Celeron 900 Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2009-12-29 20:00 ` Rafał Miłecki
2009-12-29 20:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-16 17:48 ` m.s.tsirkin
35 siblings, 1 reply; 98+ messages in thread
From: Rafał Miłecki @ 2009-12-29 20:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Adrian Bunk, Andrew Morton,
Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich, Kernel Testers List,
Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List,
Linux Wireless List, DRI
2009/12/29 Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>:
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14910
> Subject : Stable version 2.6.32.2 broke my KMS Radeon setup
> Submitter : Ruud Linders <kernelml@xs4all.nl>
> Date : 2009-12-20 12:02 (10 days old)
> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126131105608871&w=4
Has patch (I think it was even submitted to Linus).
--
Rafał
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.33-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.32
2009-12-29 20:00 ` 2.6.33-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafał Miłecki
@ 2009-12-29 20:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 98+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2009-12-29 20:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafał Miłecki, Greg KH
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Adrian Bunk, Andrew Morton,
Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich, Kernel Testers List,
Network Development, Linux ACPI, Linux PM List, Linux SCSI List,
Linux Wireless List, DRI
On Tuesday 29 December 2009, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> 2009/12/29 Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>:
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14910
> > Subject : Stable version 2.6.32.2 broke my KMS Radeon setup
> > Submitter : Ruud Linders <kernelml@xs4all.nl>
> > Date : 2009-12-20 12:02 (10 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126131105608871&w=4
>
> Has patch (I think it was even submitted to Linus).
This is a -stable only issue in fact, so I'm not going to track it from now on.
Please watch the next -stable announcement from Greg and remind him about this
issue if the patch isn't there.
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.33-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.32
2009-12-29 15:05 2.6.33-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafael J. Wysocki
` (34 preceding siblings ...)
2009-12-29 20:00 ` 2.6.33-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.32 Rafał Miłecki
@ 2010-01-16 17:48 ` m.s.tsirkin
2010-01-16 21:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
35 siblings, 1 reply; 98+ messages in thread
From: m.s.tsirkin @ 2010-01-16 17:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Adrian Bunk, Andrew Morton,
Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich, Kernel Testers List,
Network Development
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 04:05:30PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> [NOTES:
> * There you go, another round of tracking regressions. It's not too bad at
> the moment, as far as the regressions from 2.6.32 are concerned, but we have
> quite a few -stable regressions, apparently in the DRI area.
I have another one there :)
Immediately upon startup, screen is flickering (becomes
lighter and darker again). The problem occurs with kernels
2.6.33-rc1 to 2.6.33-rc4, but not with kernel 2.6.32 and below.
System details:
x86_64 kernel with 32 bit Fedora 11 userspace
kernel modesetting enabled.
dri2proto dri2proto-2.2
drm 2.4.17-23-g06a2d65
macros util-macros-1.4.1-4-g43e41a5
xf86-video-intel 2.10.0-13-g96f45c6
mesa versions(from glxinfo):
server glx version string: 1.2
client glx version string: 1.4
GLX version: 1.2
OpenGL version string: 2.1 Mesa 7.6-devel
OpenGL shading language version string: 1.20
X.Org X Server 1.6.3.901 (1.6.4 RC 1)
Hardware: lenovo thinkpad T500 with integrated intel graphics.
00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation Mobile 4 Series Chipset Memory
Controller Hub (rev 07)
00: 86 80 40 2a 06 01 90 20 07 00 00 06 00 00 00 00
10: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
20: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 aa 17 e0 20
30: 00 00 00 00 e0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 4 Series
Chipset
Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 07)
00: 86 80 42 2a 07 04 90 00 07 00 00 03 00 00 80 00
10: 04 00 40 f4 00 00 00 00 0c 00 00 d0 00 00 00 00
20: 01 18 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 aa 17 e4 20
30: 00 00 00 00 90 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0b 01 00 00
00:02.1 Display controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 4 Series Chipset
Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 07)
00: 86 80 43 2a 07 00 90 00 07 00 80 03 00 00 80 00
10: 04 00 20 f4 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
20: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 aa 17 e4 20
30: 00 00 00 00 d0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
Display adapter: integrated LVDS1.
How to reproduce: start X, observe flickering
Filed it here with X log/dmesg/xrandr/intel_reg_dump output:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=26037
(from past experience, http://bugzilla.kernel.org/ reports
seem to have been ignored).
--
MST
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.33-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.32
2010-01-16 17:48 ` m.s.tsirkin
@ 2010-01-16 21:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-16 22:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-01-17 8:27 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
0 siblings, 2 replies; 98+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2010-01-16 21:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: m.s.tsirkin
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Adrian Bunk, Andrew Morton,
Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich, Kernel Testers List,
Network Development
On Saturday 16 January 2010, m.s.tsirkin@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 04:05:30PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > [NOTES:
> > * There you go, another round of tracking regressions. It's not too bad at
> > the moment, as far as the regressions from 2.6.32 are concerned, but we have
> > quite a few -stable regressions, apparently in the DRI area.
>
> I have another one there :)
>
> Immediately upon startup, screen is flickering (becomes
> lighter and darker again). The problem occurs with kernels
> 2.6.33-rc1 to 2.6.33-rc4, but not with kernel 2.6.32 and below.
We've already had several reports like this already.
Care to review the bugs linked to http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14885
and check if none of them matches the problem you describe?
Rafael
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.33-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.32
2010-01-16 21:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2010-01-16 22:04 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-01-17 12:32 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-01-17 8:27 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
1 sibling, 1 reply; 98+ messages in thread
From: Linus Torvalds @ 2010-01-16 22:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: m.s.tsirkin, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Adrian Bunk,
Andrew Morton, Natalie Protasevich, Kernel Testers List,
Network Development
On Sat, 16 Jan 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > Immediately upon startup, screen is flickering (becomes
> > lighter and darker again). The problem occurs with kernels
> > 2.6.33-rc1 to 2.6.33-rc4, but not with kernel 2.6.32 and below.
>
> We've already had several reports like this already.
>
> Care to review the bugs linked to http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14885
> and check if none of them matches the problem you describe?
I suspect that should be fixed by commit 33814341f22 ("drm/i915: disable
LVDS downclock by default") that got merged today.
So try current -git.
Linus
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.33-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.32
2010-01-16 22:04 ` Linus Torvalds
@ 2010-01-17 12:32 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-01-17 14:18 ` Pekka Enberg
0 siblings, 1 reply; 98+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2010-01-17 12:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linus Torvalds
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Adrian Bunk,
Andrew Morton, Natalie Protasevich, Kernel Testers List,
Network Development
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 02:04:07PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 16 Jan 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >
> > > Immediately upon startup, screen is flickering (becomes
> > > lighter and darker again). The problem occurs with kernels
> > > 2.6.33-rc1 to 2.6.33-rc4, but not with kernel 2.6.32 and below.
> >
> > We've already had several reports like this already.
> >
> > Care to review the bugs linked to http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14885
> > and check if none of them matches the problem you describe?
>
> I suspect that should be fixed by commit 33814341f22 ("drm/i915: disable
> LVDS downclock by default") that got merged today.
>
> So try current -git.
>
> Linus
Tested with 6ccf80eb15ccaca4d3f1ab5162b9ded5eecd9971, still get
the flickering effect. so 33814341f22 does not seem to help.
--
MST
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.33-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.32
2010-01-17 12:32 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
@ 2010-01-17 14:18 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-01-17 15:17 ` Florian Mickler
0 siblings, 1 reply; 98+ messages in thread
From: Pekka Enberg @ 2010-01-17 14:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael S. Tsirkin
Cc: Linus Torvalds, Rafael J. Wysocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Adrian Bunk, Andrew Morton, Natalie Protasevich,
Kernel Testers List, Network Development
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin
<m.s.tsirkin@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 02:04:07PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Sat, 16 Jan 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> >
>> > > Immediately upon startup, screen is flickering (becomes
>> > > lighter and darker again). The problem occurs with kernels
>> > > 2.6.33-rc1 to 2.6.33-rc4, but not with kernel 2.6.32 and below.
>> >
>> > We've already had several reports like this already.
>> >
>> > Care to review the bugs linked to http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14885
>> > and check if none of them matches the problem you describe?
>>
>> I suspect that should be fixed by commit 33814341f22 ("drm/i915: disable
>> LVDS downclock by default") that got merged today.
>>
>> So try current -git.
>>
>> Linus
>
>
> Tested with 6ccf80eb15ccaca4d3f1ab5162b9ded5eecd9971, still get
> the flickering effect. so 33814341f22 does not seem to help.
Yeah, me too which is why I am doing a git bisect here. What's strange
about it is that the first bisection point seems to suggest that the
regression happened _before_ the DRM merge to 2.6.33-rc1. I guess it's
possible that the bug is already in 2.6.32 but I've yet to see the
flickering effect. Oh well, back to bisect...
Pekka
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.33-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.32
2010-01-17 14:18 ` Pekka Enberg
@ 2010-01-17 15:17 ` Florian Mickler
2010-01-17 16:43 ` Pekka Enberg
0 siblings, 1 reply; 98+ messages in thread
From: Florian Mickler @ 2010-01-17 15:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: kernel-testers
On Sun, 17 Jan 2010 16:18:39 +0200
Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin
> <m.s.tsirkin@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 02:04:07PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sat, 16 Jan 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Immediately upon startup, screen is flickering (becomes
> >> > > lighter and darker again). The problem occurs with kernels
> >> > > 2.6.33-rc1 to 2.6.33-rc4, but not with kernel 2.6.32 and below.
> >> >
> >> > We've already had several reports like this already.
> >> >
> >> > Care to review the bugs linked to http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14885
> >> > and check if none of them matches the problem you describe?
> >>
> >> I suspect that should be fixed by commit 33814341f22 ("drm/i915: disable
> >> LVDS downclock by default") that got merged today.
> >>
> >> So try current -git.
> >>
> >> Linus
> >
> >
> > Tested with 6ccf80eb15ccaca4d3f1ab5162b9ded5eecd9971, still get
> > the flickering effect. so 33814341f22 does not seem to help.
>
> Yeah, me too which is why I am doing a git bisect here. What's strange
> about it is that the first bisection point seems to suggest that the
> regression happened _before_ the DRM merge to 2.6.33-rc1. I guess it's
> possible that the bug is already in 2.6.32 but I've yet to see the
> flickering effect. Oh well, back to bisect...
>
> Pekka
on which side of the merge? linus or drm?
i.e. it is to be expected to be before the merge, (but on the drm side)
so don't get confused... or did i misunderstood the situation?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.33-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.32
2010-01-17 15:17 ` Florian Mickler
@ 2010-01-17 16:43 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-01-17 17:23 ` Pekka Enberg
0 siblings, 1 reply; 98+ messages in thread
From: Pekka Enberg @ 2010-01-17 16:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Florian Mickler
Cc: linux-kernel, kernel-testers, Linus Torvalds, Jesse Barnes,
Michael S. Tsirkin
Hi Florian,
(Please don't trim the cc list.)
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Florian Mickler <florian@mickler.org> wrote:
> on which side of the merge? linus or drm?
> i.e. it is to be expected to be before the merge, (but on the drm side)
> so don't get confused... or did i misunderstood the situation?
Like I said, don't read too much into the results but the current
situation looks like the regression happened _after_ 2.6.32 but before
any of the DRM code was merged to 2.6.33-rc1. I don't think that makes
much sense which is why I'm back to testing 2.6.32 more to see if the
bug is there already but just harder to trigger for whatever reason.
Pekka
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.33-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.32
2010-01-17 16:43 ` Pekka Enberg
@ 2010-01-17 17:23 ` Pekka Enberg
2010-01-18 11:26 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
0 siblings, 1 reply; 98+ messages in thread
From: Pekka Enberg @ 2010-01-17 17:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Florian Mickler
Cc: linux-kernel, kernel-testers, Linus Torvalds, Jesse Barnes,
Michael S. Tsirkin
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 6:43 PM, Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> wrote:
> Hi Florian,
>
> (Please don't trim the cc list.)
>
> On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Florian Mickler <florian@mickler.org> wrote:
>> on which side of the merge? linus or drm?
>> i.e. it is to be expected to be before the merge, (but on the drm side)
>> so don't get confused... or did i misunderstood the situation?
>
> Like I said, don't read too much into the results but the current
> situation looks like the regression happened _after_ 2.6.32 but before
> any of the DRM code was merged to 2.6.33-rc1. I don't think that makes
> much sense which is why I'm back to testing 2.6.32 more to see if the
> bug is there already but just harder to trigger for whatever reason.
OK, confirmed. I can see the "flashing" bug with 2.6.32 as well. It
just takes more time to trigger than in 2.6.33-rc1. I am going back to
test 2.6.31 now.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.33-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.32
2010-01-17 17:23 ` Pekka Enberg
@ 2010-01-18 11:26 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-01-18 11:36 ` Pekka Enberg
0 siblings, 1 reply; 98+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2010-01-18 11:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pekka Enberg
Cc: Florian Mickler, linux-kernel, kernel-testers, Linus Torvalds,
Jesse Barnes
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 07:23:35PM +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 6:43 PM, Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi> wrote:
> > Hi Florian,
> >
> > (Please don't trim the cc list.)
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Florian Mickler <florian@mickler.org> wrote:
> >> on which side of the merge? linus or drm?
> >> i.e. it is to be expected to be before the merge, (but on the drm side)
> >> so don't get confused... or did i misunderstood the situation?
> >
> > Like I said, don't read too much into the results but the current
> > situation looks like the regression happened _after_ 2.6.32 but before
> > any of the DRM code was merged to 2.6.33-rc1. I don't think that makes
> > much sense which is why I'm back to testing 2.6.32 more to see if the
> > bug is there already but just harder to trigger for whatever reason.
>
> OK, confirmed. I can see the "flashing" bug with 2.6.32 as well. It
> just takes more time to trigger than in 2.6.33-rc1. I am going back to
> test 2.6.31 now.
Well, I've been using 2.6.32 day to day since it came out and never saw
this bug there. What do you do to trigger this bug?
--
MST
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.33-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.32
2010-01-18 11:26 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
@ 2010-01-18 11:36 ` Pekka Enberg
0 siblings, 0 replies; 98+ messages in thread
From: Pekka Enberg @ 2010-01-18 11:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael S. Tsirkin
Cc: Florian Mickler, linux-kernel, kernel-testers, Linus Torvalds,
Jesse Barnes
Michael S. Tsirkin kirjoitti:
> Well, I've been using 2.6.32 day to day since it came out and never saw
> this bug there. What do you do to trigger this bug?
It usually triggers when I'm building a kernel. I don't have a good test
case for this, I just need to use the machine long enough to see a
flash. And it's pretty hard to trigger in 2.6.32.
I am now bisecting in the middle of the i915 merge in 2.6.31 so if
people know there are suspicious commits that I should try to revert,
please let me know.
Pekka
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread
* Re: 2.6.33-rc2: Reported regressions from 2.6.32
2010-01-16 21:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-16 22:04 ` Linus Torvalds
@ 2010-01-17 8:27 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
1 sibling, 0 replies; 98+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2010-01-17 8:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Adrian Bunk, Andrew Morton,
Linus Torvalds, Natalie Protasevich, Kernel Testers List,
Network Development
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 10:57:16PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Saturday 16 January 2010, m.s.tsirkin@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 04:05:30PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > [NOTES:
> > > * There you go, another round of tracking regressions. It's not too bad at
> > > the moment, as far as the regressions from 2.6.32 are concerned, but we have
> > > quite a few -stable regressions, apparently in the DRI area.
> >
> > I have another one there :)
> >
> > Immediately upon startup, screen is flickering (becomes
> > lighter and darker again). The problem occurs with kernels
> > 2.6.33-rc1 to 2.6.33-rc4, but not with kernel 2.6.32 and below.
>
> We've already had several reports like this already.
>
> Care to review the bugs linked to http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14885
> and check if none of them matches the problem you describe?
>
> Rafael
Well, not obviously. I will try latest git as Linus suggested.
--
MST
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 98+ messages in thread