From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: Stephan Mueller <smueller@chronox.de>, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
Linux Kernel Developers List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, andi@firstfloor.org,
sandyinchina@gmail.com, jsd@av8n.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/7] random: replace non-blocking pool with a Chacha20-based CRNG
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2016 11:52:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b9ce7eec-e573-f187-feb5-b1110313f2ac@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2101992.L9gKN5cFdv@tauon.atsec.com>
On 06/20/16 08:49, Stephan Mueller wrote:
> Am Montag, 20. Juni 2016, 11:01:47 schrieb Theodore Ts'o:
>
> Hi Theodore,
>
>>
>> So simply doing chacha20 encryption in a tight loop in the kernel
>> might not be a good proxy for what would actually happen in real life
>> when someone calls getrandom(2). (Another good question to ask is
>> when someone might be needing to generate millions of 256-bit session
>> keys per second, when the D-H setup, even if you were using ECCDH,
>> would be largely dominating the time for the connection setup anyway.)
>
> Is speed everything we should care about? What about:
>
> - offloading of crypto operation from the CPU
>
This sounds like a speed operation (and very unlikely to be a win given
the usage).
> - potentially additional security features a hardware cipher may provide like
> cache coloring attack resistance?
How about burning that bridge when and if we get to it? It sounds very
hypothetical.
I guess I could add in some comments here about how a lot of these
problems can be eliminated by offloading an entire DRNG into hardware,
but I don't think it is productive.
-hpa
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-20 20:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-06-13 15:48 [PATCH-v4 0/7] random: replace urandom pool with a CRNG Theodore Ts'o
2016-06-13 15:48 ` [PATCH 1/7] random: initialize the non-blocking pool via add_hwgenerator_randomness() Theodore Ts'o
2016-06-13 15:48 ` [PATCH 2/7] random: print a warning for the first ten uninitialized random users Theodore Ts'o
2016-06-13 15:48 ` [PATCH 3/7] random: add interrupt callback to VMBus IRQ handler Theodore Ts'o
2016-06-13 15:48 ` [PATCH 4/7] random: properly align get_random_int_hash Theodore Ts'o
2016-06-13 15:48 ` [PATCH 5/7] random: replace non-blocking pool with a Chacha20-based CRNG Theodore Ts'o
2016-06-13 18:00 ` Stephan Mueller
2016-06-13 19:03 ` Theodore Ts'o
2016-06-15 14:59 ` Herbert Xu
2016-06-19 23:18 ` Theodore Ts'o
2016-06-20 1:25 ` Herbert Xu
2016-06-20 5:02 ` Theodore Ts'o
2016-06-20 5:19 ` Herbert Xu
2016-06-20 15:01 ` Theodore Ts'o
2016-06-20 15:49 ` Stephan Mueller
2016-06-20 18:52 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2016-06-20 23:48 ` Theodore Ts'o
2016-06-26 18:47 ` Pavel Machek
2016-06-26 19:10 ` Stephan Mueller
2016-06-26 22:51 ` Theodore Ts'o
2016-06-13 15:48 ` [PATCH 6/7] random: make /dev/urandom scalable for silly userspace programs Theodore Ts'o
2016-08-21 9:53 ` Jan Varho
2016-08-21 11:36 ` Theodore Ts'o
2016-06-13 15:48 ` [PATCH 7/7] random: add backtracking protection to the CRNG Theodore Ts'o
2016-06-26 18:47 ` Pavel Machek
2016-06-26 23:05 ` Theodore Ts'o
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b9ce7eec-e573-f187-feb5-b1110313f2ac@zytor.com \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=jsd@av8n.com \
--cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sandyinchina@gmail.com \
--cc=smueller@chronox.de \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).