linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Cc: LinusW <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
	"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] gpio: Make "offset" and "unsigned int", not just "unsigned"
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 17:57:53 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bc5c8165908facbb4781b2f29903dfacdf625e83.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAD=FV=Us6LyfgeXvxnqq+KhHN1djok1y+W_xzSb-KGFy2wgEMg@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, 2020-04-28 at 17:50 -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 5:38 PM Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, 2020-04-28 at 17:23 -0700, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> > > When I copied the function prototypes from the GPIO header file into
> > > my own driver, checkpatch yelled at me saying that I shouldn't use use
> > > "unsigned" but instead should say "unsigned int".  Let's make the
> > > header file use "unsigned int" so others who copy like I did won't get
> > > yelled at.
> > 
> > There are a few other unsigned declarations in the file.
> 
> There are?  I swear I looked for them before I sent my patch and I
> couldn't find them.  Then I looked again upon seeing your reply and I
> still can't find them.  My eyes are bad, though.  Maybe you can give
> me specifics?

$ git grep -P -n '\bunsigned\s+(?!int|long)' include/linux/gpio/driver.h
include/linux/gpio/driver.h:352:                                                unsigned offset);
include/linux/gpio/driver.h:354:                                                unsigned offset);
include/linux/gpio/driver.h:356:                                                unsigned offset);
include/linux/gpio/driver.h:358:                                                unsigned offset);
include/linux/gpio/driver.h:360:                                                unsigned offset, int value);
include/linux/gpio/driver.h:362:                                                unsigned offset);
include/linux/gpio/driver.h:367:                                                unsigned offset, int value);
include/linux/gpio/driver.h:372:                                              unsigned offset,
include/linux/gpio/driver.h:375:                                                unsigned offset);
include/linux/gpio/driver.h:462:                        unsigned offset);
include/linux/gpio/driver.h:660:int gpiochip_generic_request(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned offset);
include/linux/gpio/driver.h:661:void gpiochip_generic_free(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned offset);
include/linux/gpio/driver.h:662:int gpiochip_generic_config(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned offset,

> > Maybe do all of them (and remove the unnecessary externs)?
> 
> You mean just remove the word "extern" everywhere in this file?  Sure,
> I can if you want.

Up to the actual maintainers I suppose.
There are only a few extern function declarations.
Most do not use extern.

> > trivial reformatting of the function pointer block too
> 
> Wow, I must be totally out of it.  Maybe it's the gin and tonic I just
> had.  I don't understand this comment either.  Can you clarify?

	int				(*foo)(...,
				               ...);

might be better with fewer tabs between return type and function pointer

	int		(*foo)(..., ...);

cheers, oe


  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-29  0:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-29  0:23 [PATCH 1/2] gpio: Document proper return value for gpio drivers Douglas Anderson
2020-04-29  0:23 ` [PATCH 2/2] gpio: Make "offset" and "unsigned int", not just "unsigned" Douglas Anderson
2020-04-29  0:38   ` Joe Perches
2020-04-29  0:50     ` Doug Anderson
2020-04-29  0:57       ` Joe Perches [this message]
2020-04-29  1:04         ` Doug Anderson
2020-04-29  2:32           ` Joe Perches
2020-05-12 21:09     ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-04-29 12:19   ` Linus Walleij
2020-04-29 12:16 ` [PATCH 1/2] gpio: Document proper return value for gpio drivers Linus Walleij

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bc5c8165908facbb4781b2f29903dfacdf625e83.camel@perches.com \
    --to=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
    --cc=dianders@chromium.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).