From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
To: Brian Masney <masneyb@onstation.org>, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org
Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
lars@metafoo.de, pmeerw@pmeerw.net, knaack.h@gmx.de,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jon.Brenner@ams.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 13/26] staging: iio: tsl2583: fix multiline comment syntax
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2016 12:17:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c07b488b-3530-b4b1-5fc1-abf894f90a99@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1478974781-1457-14-git-send-email-masneyb@onstation.org>
On 12/11/16 18:19, Brian Masney wrote:
> The definition of the tsl2583_device_lux struct has a series of single
> line comments. There are two other cases where the multiline comments
> did not have an initial blank line. Change these comments to use the
> proper multiline syntax.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Masney <masneyb@onstation.org>
Applied.
> ---
> drivers/staging/iio/light/tsl2583.c | 14 +++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/light/tsl2583.c b/drivers/staging/iio/light/tsl2583.c
> index 8303753..52a39a6 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/iio/light/tsl2583.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/light/tsl2583.c
> @@ -93,9 +93,11 @@ struct tsl2583_lux {
> unsigned int ch1;
> };
>
> -/* This structure is intentionally large to accommodate updates via sysfs. */
> -/* Sized to 11 = max 10 segments + 1 termination segment */
> -/* Assumption is one and only one type of glass used */
> +/*
> + * This structure is intentionally large to accommodate updates via sysfs.
> + * Sized to 11 = max 10 segments + 1 termination segment. Assumption is that
> + * one and only one type of glass used.
> + */
> static struct tsl2583_lux tsl2583_device_lux[11] = {
> { 9830, 8520, 15729 },
> { 12452, 10807, 23344 },
> @@ -261,7 +263,8 @@ static int tsl2583_get_lux(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
> lux = (lux + (chip->als_time_scale >> 1)) /
> chip->als_time_scale;
>
> - /* Adjust for active gain scale.
> + /*
> + * Adjust for active gain scale.
> * The tsl2583_device_lux tables above have a factor of 8192 built in,
> * so we need to shift right.
> * User-specified gain provides a multiplier.
> @@ -553,7 +556,8 @@ static ssize_t in_illuminance_lux_table_store(struct device *dev,
>
> get_options(buf, ARRAY_SIZE(value), value);
>
> - /* We now have an array of ints starting at value[1], and
> + /*
> + * We now have an array of ints starting at value[1], and
> * enumerated by value[0].
> * We expect each group of three ints is one table entry,
> * and the last table entry is all 0.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-13 12:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-12 18:19 [PATCH v4 00/26] staging: iio: tsl2583: move out of staging Brian Masney
2016-11-12 18:19 ` [PATCH v4 01/26] staging: iio: tsl2583: check if chip is in a working state in in_illuminance_calibrate_store Brian Masney
2016-11-13 11:54 ` Jonathan Cameron
2016-11-12 18:19 ` [PATCH v4 02/26] staging: iio: tsl2583: remove unnecessary chip status check in taos_get_lux Brian Masney
2016-11-13 11:55 ` Jonathan Cameron
2016-11-12 18:19 ` [PATCH v4 03/26] staging: iio: tsl2583: remove unnecessary chip status checks in suspend/resume Brian Masney
2016-11-13 11:56 ` Jonathan Cameron
2016-11-12 18:19 ` [PATCH v4 04/26] staging: iio: tsl2583: change current chip state from a tristate to a bool Brian Masney
2016-11-13 11:58 ` Jonathan Cameron
2016-11-12 18:19 ` [PATCH v4 05/26] staging: iio: tsl2583: remove redundant write to the control register in taos_probe() Brian Masney
2016-11-13 12:06 ` Jonathan Cameron
2016-11-12 18:19 ` [PATCH v4 06/26] staging: iio: tsl2583: remove the FSF's mailing address Brian Masney
2016-11-13 12:07 ` Jonathan Cameron
2016-11-12 18:19 ` [PATCH v4 07/26] staging: iio: tsl2583: cleaned up logging Brian Masney
2016-11-13 12:07 ` Jonathan Cameron
2016-11-12 18:19 ` [PATCH v4 08/26] staging: iio: tsl2583: unify function and variable prefix to tsl2583_ Brian Masney
2016-11-13 12:09 ` Jonathan Cameron
2016-11-12 18:19 ` [PATCH v4 09/26] staging: iio: tsl2583: fix alignment of #define values Brian Masney
2016-11-13 12:13 ` Jonathan Cameron
2016-11-12 18:19 ` [PATCH v4 10/26] staging: iio: tsl2583: fix comparison between signed and unsigned integers Brian Masney
2016-11-13 12:14 ` Jonathan Cameron
2016-11-12 18:19 ` [PATCH v4 11/26] staging: iio: tsl2583: change newlines to improve readability Brian Masney
2016-11-13 12:15 ` Jonathan Cameron
2016-11-12 18:19 ` [PATCH v4 12/26] staging: iio: tsl2583: combine sysfs documentation Brian Masney
2016-11-13 12:16 ` Jonathan Cameron
2016-11-12 18:19 ` [PATCH v4 13/26] staging: iio: tsl2583: fix multiline comment syntax Brian Masney
2016-11-13 12:17 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2016-11-12 18:19 ` [PATCH v4 14/26] staging: iio: tsl2583: updated code comment to match what the code does Brian Masney
2016-11-13 12:18 ` Jonathan Cameron
2016-11-12 18:19 ` [PATCH v4 15/26] staging: iio: tsl2583: moved code block inside else statement Brian Masney
2016-11-13 12:20 ` Jonathan Cameron
2016-11-12 18:19 ` [PATCH v4 16/26] staging: iio: tsl2583: change tsl2583_als_calibrate() to return 0 on success Brian Masney
2016-11-13 12:21 ` Jonathan Cameron
2016-11-12 18:19 ` [PATCH v4 17/26] staging: iio: tsl2583: remove unnecessary parentheses Brian Masney
2016-11-13 12:22 ` Jonathan Cameron
2016-11-12 18:19 ` [PATCH v4 18/26] staging: iio: tsl2583: don't assume an unsigned int is 32 bits Brian Masney
2016-11-13 12:23 ` Jonathan Cameron
2016-11-12 18:19 ` [PATCH v4 19/26] staging: iio: tsl2583: move from a global to a per device lux table Brian Masney
2016-11-13 12:25 ` Jonathan Cameron
2016-11-12 18:19 ` [PATCH v4 20/26] staging: iio: tsl2583: add tsl2583 to list of supported devices in the header Brian Masney
2016-11-13 12:28 ` Jonathan Cameron
2016-11-12 18:19 ` [PATCH v4 21/26] staging: iio: tsl2583: clarified comment about clearing interrupts Brian Masney
2016-11-13 12:28 ` Jonathan Cameron
2016-11-12 18:19 ` [PATCH v4 22/26] staging: iio: tsl2583: remove comment for tsl2583_probe() Brian Masney
2016-11-13 12:29 ` Jonathan Cameron
2016-11-12 18:19 ` [PATCH v4 23/26] staging: iio: tsl2583: remove unnecessary memset call Brian Masney
2016-11-13 12:29 ` Jonathan Cameron
2016-11-12 18:19 ` [PATCH v4 24/26] staging: iio: tsl2583: remove unnecessary variable initialization Brian Masney
2016-11-13 12:30 ` Jonathan Cameron
2016-11-12 18:19 ` [PATCH v4 25/26] staging: iio: tsl2583: add copyright and MODULE_AUTHOR Brian Masney
2016-11-13 12:35 ` Jonathan Cameron
2016-11-12 18:19 ` [PATCH v4 26/26] staging: iio: tsl2583: move out of staging Brian Masney
2016-11-13 12:57 ` Jonathan Cameron
2016-11-13 16:18 ` Brian Masney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c07b488b-3530-b4b1-5fc1-abf894f90a99@kernel.org \
--to=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=Jon.Brenner@ams.com \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=knaack.h@gmx.de \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masneyb@onstation.org \
--cc=pmeerw@pmeerw.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).