Re: [PATCH 09/37] PCI: dwc: designware: Parse *num-lanes* property in dw_pcie_setup_rc

[Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@synopsys.com>]

Hi,

Às 10:25 AM de 1/12/2017, Kishon Vijay Abraham I escreveu:
> *num-lanes* dt property is parsed in dw_pcie_host_init. However
> *num-lanes* property is applicable to both root complex mode and
> endpoint mode. As a first step, move the parsing of this property
> outside dw_pcie_host_init. This is in preparation for splitting
> pcie-designware.c to pcie-designware.c and pcie-designware-host.c
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.c |   18 +++++++++++-------
>  drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.h |    1 -
>  2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.c b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.c
> index 00a0fdc..89cdb6b 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.c
> @@ -551,10 +551,6 @@ int dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
>  		}
>  	}
>  
> -	ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "num-lanes", &pci->lanes);
> -	if (ret)
> -		pci->lanes = 0;
> -
>  	ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "num-viewport", &pci->num_viewport);
>  	if (ret)
>  		pci->num_viewport = 2;
> @@ -751,18 +747,26 @@ static int dw_pcie_wr_conf(struct pci_bus *bus, u32 devfn,
>  
>  void dw_pcie_setup_rc(struct pcie_port *pp)
>  {
> +	int ret;
> +	u32 lanes;
>  	u32 val;
>  	struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp);
> +	struct device *dev = pci->dev;
> +	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
>  
>  	/* get iATU unroll support */
>  	pci->iatu_unroll_enabled = dw_pcie_iatu_unroll_enabled(pci);
>  	dev_dbg(pci->dev, "iATU unroll: %s\n",
>  		pci->iatu_unroll_enabled ? "enabled" : "disabled");
>  
> +	ret = of_property_read_u32(np, "num-lanes", &lanes);
> +	if (ret)
> +		lanes = 0;

You moved from host_init to root complex setup function, which in my opinion did
not improve (in this scope).

I suggest that instead of making so much intermediary patches, which is nice to
understand your development sequence, but hard to review. Wouldn't be better to
condense some of the patches? We would have a cloear vision of the final product :)

Joao

> +
>  	/* set the number of lanes */
>  	val = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, PCIE_PORT_LINK_CONTROL);
>  	val &= ~PORT_LINK_MODE_MASK;
> -	switch (pci->lanes) {
> +	switch (lanes) {
>  	case 1:
>  		val |= PORT_LINK_MODE_1_LANES;
>  		break;
> @@ -776,7 +780,7 @@ void dw_pcie_setup_rc(struct pcie_port *pp)
>  		val |= PORT_LINK_MODE_8_LANES;
>  		break;
>  	default:
> -		dev_err(pci->dev, "num-lanes %u: invalid value\n", pci->lanes);
> +		dev_err(pci->dev, "num-lanes %u: invalid value\n", lanes);
>  		return;
>  	}
>  	dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCIE_PORT_LINK_CONTROL, val);
> @@ -784,7 +788,7 @@ void dw_pcie_setup_rc(struct pcie_port *pp)
>  	/* set link width speed control register */
>  	val = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, PCIE_LINK_WIDTH_SPEED_CONTROL);
>  	val &= ~PORT_LOGIC_LINK_WIDTH_MASK;
> -	switch (pci->lanes) {
> +	switch (lanes) {
>  	case 1:
>  		val |= PORT_LOGIC_LINK_WIDTH_1_LANES;
>  		break;
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.h b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.h
> index d4b3d43..491fbe3 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.h
> +++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.h
> @@ -148,7 +148,6 @@ struct dw_pcie_ops {
>  struct dw_pcie {
>  	struct device		*dev;
>  	void __iomem		*dbi_base;
> -	u32			lanes;
>  	u32			num_viewport;
>  	u8			iatu_unroll_enabled;
>  	struct pcie_port	pp;
>