From: Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@leemhuis.info>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 00/26] Make reporting-bugs easier to grasp and yet more detailed & helpful
Date: Sun, 22 Nov 2020 06:33:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dda474a6-db81-89bb-1f9f-ccf2558d2840@leemhuis.info> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201120145813.76b7b326@lwn.net>
Am 20.11.20 um 22:58 schrieb Jonathan Corbet:
> On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 11:46:07 +0100
> Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@leemhuis.info> wrote:
>> Am 19.11.20 um 01:29 schrieb Jonathan Corbet:
>>> On Sun, 15 Nov 2020 11:13:52 +0100
>>> Thorsten Leemhuis <linux@leemhuis.info> wrote:
>>
>>> - Collapse the whole thing down to a patch adding reporting-bugs-v2.rst
>>> (or some suitable name). I do wonder if it should also move to the
>>> process manual as part of this; not only admins will report bugs.
>> After a night's sleep and Randy's comment I for now settled on
>> Documentation/admin-guide/reporting-issues.rst
> Keeping it in the admin guide is OK. Not sure about the name, though; if
> you're really dead set against bugs, maybe reporting-problems.rst?
Well, I'm not dead set against bugs, but it somehow seems wrong to me:
people have problems/issues they deal with, which in the end might turn
out to not be a bug/error in the code at all. That afaics why tracker
software for such reports is often called "issue tracker" instead of
"bug tracker" (and nearly nobody calls them problem trackers afaics)..
That's why I went with "issues" in the name and the text.
But in the end I'm not a native English speaker, so I guess it's better
if I follow advice from those. Randy, what would you choose?
> I'd be a bit more straightforward:
>
> This document is obsolete, and will be replaced by
> Documentation/admin-guide/$NAME in the near future.
>
> Not sure that more is really needed?
Totally fine for me (I guess I tried to be less bold and was overly
careful).
@Jonathan, one more question: when I submit this again, should I CC more
people (Linus, Greg, ?) to give them a chance to speak up before this
lands in your tree?
Ciao, Thorsten
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-22 5:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-12 17:58 [RFC PATCH v2 00/26] Make reporting-bugs easier to grasp and yet more detailed & helpful Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-11-12 17:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/26] docs: reporting-bugs: temporary markers for licensing and diff reasons Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-11-12 17:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/26] docs: reporting-bugs: Create a TLDR how to report issues Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-11-12 17:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/26] docs: reporting-bugs: step-by-step guide on " Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-11-12 17:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/26] docs: reporting-bugs: step-by-step guide for issues in stable & longterm Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-11-12 17:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/26] docs: reporting-bugs: begin reference section providing details Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-11-12 17:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/26] docs: reporting-bugs: point out we only care about fresh vanilla kernels Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-11-12 17:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/26] docs: reporting-bugs: let users classify their issue Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-11-12 17:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/26] docs: reporting-bugs: make readers check the taint flag Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-11-19 0:05 ` Jonathan Corbet
2020-11-19 10:26 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-11-12 17:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/26] docs: reporting-bugs: help users find the proper place for their report Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-11-12 17:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/26] docs: reporting-bugs: remind people to look for existing reports Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-11-12 17:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/26] docs: reporting-bugs: remind people to back up their data Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-11-12 17:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 12/26] docs: reporting-bugs: tell users to disable DKMS et al Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-11-12 17:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 13/26] docs: reporting-bugs: point out the environment might be causing issue Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-11-12 17:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 14/26] docs: reporting-bugs: make users write notes, one for each issue Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-11-12 17:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 15/26] docs: reporting-bugs: make readers test a fresh kernel Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-11-12 17:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 16/26] docs: reporting-bugs: let users check taint status again Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-11-12 17:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 17/26] docs: reporting-bugs: explain options if reproducing on mainline fails Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-11-12 17:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 18/26] docs: reporting-bugs: let users optimize their notes Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-11-12 17:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 19/26] docs: reporting-bugs: decode failure messages [need help!] Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-11-12 17:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 20/26] docs: reporting-bugs: instructions for handling regressions Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-11-12 17:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 21/26] docs: reporting-bugs: details on writing and sending the report Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-11-19 0:17 ` Jonathan Corbet
2020-11-19 9:42 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-11-12 17:58 ` [RFC PATCH v2 22/26] docs: reporting-bugs: explain what users should do once the report is out Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-11-12 17:59 ` [RFC PATCH v2 23/26] docs: reporting-bugs: details for issues specific to stable and longterm Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-11-12 17:59 ` [RFC PATCH v2 24/26] docs: reporting-bugs: explain why users might get neither reply nor fix Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-11-12 17:59 ` [RFC PATCH v2 25/26] docs: reporting-bugs: explain things could be easier Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-11-12 17:59 ` [RFC PATCH v2 26/26] docs: reporting-bugs: add SPDX tag and license hint, remove markers Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-11-13 22:33 ` [RFC PATCH v2 00/26] Make reporting-bugs easier to grasp and yet more detailed & helpful Jonathan Corbet
2020-11-13 22:47 ` Randy Dunlap
2020-11-15 10:13 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-11-19 0:29 ` Jonathan Corbet
2020-11-19 12:29 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-11-19 16:20 ` Randy Dunlap
2020-11-20 21:59 ` Jonathan Corbet
2020-11-20 10:46 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2020-11-20 16:27 ` Randy Dunlap
2020-11-20 21:58 ` Jonathan Corbet
2020-11-22 5:33 ` Thorsten Leemhuis [this message]
2020-11-22 5:42 ` Randy Dunlap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=dda474a6-db81-89bb-1f9f-ccf2558d2840@leemhuis.info \
--to=linux@leemhuis.info \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).