linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2] checkpatch: DT bindings should be a separate patch
@ 2018-08-10 17:05 Rob Herring
  2018-08-10 18:14 ` Joe Perches
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Rob Herring @ 2018-08-10 17:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Joe Perches; +Cc: linux-kernel, Andrew Morton, Andy Whitcroft

Devicetree bindings should be their own patch as documented in
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.txt section I.1.
This is because bindings are logically independent from a driver
implementation, they have a different maintainer (even though they often
are applied via the same tree), and it makes for a cleaner history in
the DT only tree created with git-filter-branch.

Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
---
v2:
- Add doc pointer to warning
- Simplify logic

Joe, this makes $is_binding_patch an empty value when the regex doesn't 
match rather than 0 which would be more logical IMO. It seems to work 
fine, but I'm not sure if there's a better way to do it.

 scripts/checkpatch.pl | 14 ++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)

diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
index a9c05506e325..f9aba4bc41ce 100755
--- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
+++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
@@ -2236,6 +2236,7 @@ sub process {
 	our $clean = 1;
 	my $signoff = 0;
 	my $is_patch = 0;
+	my $is_binding_patch = -1;
 	my $in_header_lines = $file ? 0 : 1;
 	my $in_commit_log = 0;		#Scanning lines before patch
 	my $has_commit_log = 0;		#Encountered lines before patch
@@ -2485,6 +2486,19 @@ sub process {
 				$check = $check_orig;
 			}
 			$checklicenseline = 1;
+
+			if ($realfile !~ /^MAINTAINERS/) {
+				my $last_binding_patch = $is_binding_patch;
+
+				$is_binding_patch = ($realfile =~ m@^(?:Documentation/devicetree/|include/dt-bindings/)@);
+
+				if (($last_binding_patch != -1) &&
+				    ($last_binding_patch ^ $is_binding_patch)) {
+					WARN("DT_SPLIT_BINDING_PATCH",
+					     "DT binding docs and includes should be a separate patch. See: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.txt");
+				}
+			}
+
 			next;
 		}
 
-- 
2.17.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] checkpatch: DT bindings should be a separate patch
  2018-08-10 17:05 [PATCH v2] checkpatch: DT bindings should be a separate patch Rob Herring
@ 2018-08-10 18:14 ` Joe Perches
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Joe Perches @ 2018-08-10 18:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rob Herring; +Cc: linux-kernel, Andrew Morton, Andy Whitcroft

On Fri, 2018-08-10 at 11:05 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> Devicetree bindings should be their own patch as documented in
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.txt section I.1.
> This is because bindings are logically independent from a driver
> implementation, they have a different maintainer (even though they often
> are applied via the same tree), and it makes for a cleaner history in
> the DT only tree created with git-filter-branch.
> 
> Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>
> Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> ---
> v2:
> - Add doc pointer to warning
> - Simplify logic
> 
> Joe, this makes $is_binding_patch an empty value when the regex doesn't 
> match rather than 0 which would be more logical IMO. It seems to work 
> fine, but I'm not sure if there's a better way to do it.

Hi Rob.  This looks fine with a couple nits.

>  scripts/checkpatch.pl | 14 ++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> index a9c05506e325..f9aba4bc41ce 100755
> --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> @@ -2236,6 +2236,7 @@ sub process {
>  	our $clean = 1;
>  	my $signoff = 0;
>  	my $is_patch = 0;
> +	my $is_binding_patch = -1;
>  	my $in_header_lines = $file ? 0 : 1;
>  	my $in_commit_log = 0;		#Scanning lines before patch
>  	my $has_commit_log = 0;		#Encountered lines before patch
> @@ -2485,6 +2486,19 @@ sub process {
>  				$check = $check_orig;
>  			}
>  			$checklicenseline = 1;
> +
> +			if ($realfile !~ /^MAINTAINERS/) {
> +				my $last_binding_patch = $is_binding_patch;
> +
> +				$is_binding_patch = ($realfile =~ m@^(?:Documentation/devicetree/|include/dt-bindings/)@);

If you want 0/1 you could use:

			$is_binding_patch = () = $realfile =~ m@^(?:Documentation/devicetree/|include/dt-bindings/)@;

(perl syntax is a constant joy)

> +
> +				if (($last_binding_patch != -1) &&
> +				    ($last_binding_patch ^ $is_binding_patch)) {
> +					WARN("DT_SPLIT_BINDING_PATCH",
> +					     "DT binding docs and includes should be a separate patch. See: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.txt");

This is missing a '\n' newline at the end of the message.

> +				}
> +			}
> +
>  			next;
>  		}
>  

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2018-08-10 18:15 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-08-10 17:05 [PATCH v2] checkpatch: DT bindings should be a separate patch Rob Herring
2018-08-10 18:14 ` Joe Perches

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).