From: Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org>
To: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
Cc: mathieu.poirier@linaro.org, agross@kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ohad@wizery.com,
rishabhb@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: Fixup coredump debugfs disable request
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2020 21:02:30 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e9709b3ceb5d4136ecac77d5416edde8@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200915151837.GC478@uller>
Hey Bjorn,
Thanks for taking time to review the
patch.
On 2020-09-15 20:48, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Tue 15 Sep 07:34 UTC 2020, Sibi Sankar wrote:
>
>> Currently the coredump debugfs entry takes in "disable" to set the
>> coredump state to "disabled". Let's just accept the expected state
>> instead.
>>
>
> I like this patch, but rather than arguing that it should match the
> name
> of the internal state I think you should either argue that when read
> you
> get "disabled" back or that "disabled" would make it consistent with
> the
> recovery.
Sure, I'll re-word the commit message.
I probably choose the read back argument
because that's what was odd about it in
the first place.
>
> Regards,
> Bjorn
>
>> Fixes: 3afdc59e43904 ("remoteproc: Add coredump debugfs entry")
>> Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_debugfs.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_debugfs.c
>> b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_debugfs.c
>> index 2e3b3e22e1d01..7ca823f6aa638 100644
>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_debugfs.c
>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_debugfs.c
>> @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ static ssize_t rproc_coredump_write(struct file
>> *filp,
>> goto out;
>> }
>>
>> - if (!strncmp(buf, "disable", count)) {
>> + if (!strncmp(buf, "disabled", count)) {
>> rproc->dump_conf = RPROC_COREDUMP_DISABLED;
>> } else if (!strncmp(buf, "inline", count)) {
>> rproc->dump_conf = RPROC_COREDUMP_INLINE;
>> --
>> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora
>> Forum,
>> a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
>>
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-15 22:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-15 7:34 [PATCH] remoteproc: Fixup coredump debugfs disable request Sibi Sankar
2020-09-15 15:18 ` Bjorn Andersson
2020-09-15 15:32 ` Sibi Sankar [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e9709b3ceb5d4136ecac77d5416edde8@codeaurora.org \
--to=sibis@codeaurora.org \
--cc=agross@kernel.org \
--cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=ohad@wizery.com \
--cc=rishabhb@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).