From: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>
To: Srinivas Neeli <sneeli@xilinx.com>,
Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
Cc: "wg@grandegger.com" <wg@grandegger.com>,
"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"kuba@kernel.org" <kuba@kernel.org>,
"linux-can@vger.kernel.org" <linux-can@vger.kernel.org>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao <appanad@xilinx.com>,
Srinivas Goud <sgoud@xilinx.com>, git <git@xilinx.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] can: xilinx_can: Add check for NAPI Poll function
Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2022 09:41:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fbe0314d-bfd3-cb0c-8af8-ab5bab276cc3@xilinx.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR02MB53867DD5740FAA93CB5BC3B4AF2E9@DM6PR02MB5386.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Hi,
On 2/9/22 09:40, Srinivas Neeli wrote:
> Hi Marc,
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
>> Sent: Wednesday, February 9, 2022 2:02 PM
>> To: Srinivas Neeli <sneeli@xilinx.com>
>> Cc: wg@grandegger.com; davem@davemloft.net; kuba@kernel.org; Michal
>> Simek <michals@xilinx.com>; linux-can@vger.kernel.org;
>> netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-
>> kernel@vger.kernel.org; Appana Durga Kedareswara Rao
>> <appanad@xilinx.com>; Srinivas Goud <sgoud@xilinx.com>; git
>> <git@xilinx.com>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] can: xilinx_can: Add check for NAPI Poll function
>>
>> On 09.02.2022 08:29:55, Srinivas Neeli wrote:
>>>> On 08.02.2022 21:50:53, Srinivas Neeli wrote:
>>>>> Add check for NAPI poll function to avoid enabling interrupts with
>>>>> out completing the NAPI call.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for the patch. Does this fix a bug? If so, please add a Fixes:
>>>> tag that lists the patch that introduced that bug.
>>>
>>> It is not a bug. I am adding additional safety check( Validating the
>>> return value of "napi_complete_done" call).
>>
>> Thanks for your feedback. Should this go into can or can-next?
>
> If possible please apply on both branches.
New feature should come to next. It means can-next please.
Thanks,
Michal
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-09 8:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-08 16:20 [PATCH] can: xilinx_can: Add check for NAPI Poll function Srinivas Neeli
2022-02-09 7:49 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2022-02-09 8:29 ` Srinivas Neeli
2022-02-09 8:31 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2022-02-09 8:40 ` Srinivas Neeli
2022-02-09 8:41 ` Michal Simek [this message]
2022-02-09 8:43 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=fbe0314d-bfd3-cb0c-8af8-ab5bab276cc3@xilinx.com \
--to=michal.simek@xilinx.com \
--cc=appanad@xilinx.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=git@xilinx.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sgoud@xilinx.com \
--cc=sneeli@xilinx.com \
--cc=wg@grandegger.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).