* Question about the drivers movement (IBM_NEW_EMAC)
@ 2011-08-12 2:07 Stephen Rothwell
2011-08-12 2:22 ` Jeff Kirsher
2011-08-12 2:54 ` Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2011-08-12 2:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff Kirsher; +Cc: linux-kernel, David Miller, netdev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 424 bytes --]
Hi Jeff,
In commit 9aa328359545 ("ehea/ibm*: Move the IBM drivers") from Dave's
net tree, you not only move the drivers around, but you change
CONFIG_IBM_NEW_EMAC to CONFIG_IBM_EMAC. Won't that mean that all the
PowerPC configs that currently set CONFIG_IBM_NEW_EMAC to y will no
longer build this driver?
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: Question about the drivers movement (IBM_NEW_EMAC)
2011-08-12 2:07 Question about the drivers movement (IBM_NEW_EMAC) Stephen Rothwell
@ 2011-08-12 2:22 ` Jeff Kirsher
2011-08-12 2:54 ` Stephen Rothwell
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Kirsher @ 2011-08-12 2:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: linux-kernel, David Miller, netdev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 549 bytes --]
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 19:07 -0700, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
>
> In commit 9aa328359545 ("ehea/ibm*: Move the IBM drivers") from Dave's
> net tree, you not only move the drivers around, but you change
> CONFIG_IBM_NEW_EMAC to CONFIG_IBM_EMAC. Won't that mean that all the
> PowerPC configs that currently set CONFIG_IBM_NEW_EMAC to y will no
> longer build this driver?
>
Your right. The defconfig's will need to be updated by the arch
maintainers. This particular change was requested by the maintainer's
of the driver.
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: Question about the drivers movement (IBM_NEW_EMAC)
2011-08-12 2:07 Question about the drivers movement (IBM_NEW_EMAC) Stephen Rothwell
2011-08-12 2:22 ` Jeff Kirsher
@ 2011-08-12 2:54 ` Stephen Rothwell
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2011-08-12 2:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff Kirsher; +Cc: linux-kernel, David Miller, netdev, ppc-dev
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 567 bytes --]
[just cc'ing linuxppc-dev mailing list]
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 12:07:44 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Hi Jeff,
>
> In commit 9aa328359545 ("ehea/ibm*: Move the IBM drivers") from Dave's
> net tree, you not only move the drivers around, but you change
> CONFIG_IBM_NEW_EMAC to CONFIG_IBM_EMAC. Won't that mean that all the
> PowerPC configs that currently set CONFIG_IBM_NEW_EMAC to y will no
> longer build this driver?
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2011-08-12 2:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-08-12 2:07 Question about the drivers movement (IBM_NEW_EMAC) Stephen Rothwell
2011-08-12 2:22 ` Jeff Kirsher
2011-08-12 2:54 ` Stephen Rothwell
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).