[PATCH bpf] bpf: Fix narrow load on a bpf_sock returned from sk_lookup()

* [PATCH bpf] bpf: Fix narrow load on a bpf_sock returned from sk_lookup()
@ 2019-02-09  6:25 Martin KaFai Lau
  2019-02-10  1:47 ` Joe Stringer
  2019-02-10  4:02 ` Alexei Starovoitov
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Martin KaFai Lau @ 2019-02-09  6:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev; +Cc: Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, kernel-team, Joe Stringer

By adding this test to test_verifier:
{
	"reference tracking: access sk->src_ip4 (narrow load)",
	.insns = {
	BPF_SK_LOOKUP,
	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_0),
	BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 3),
	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_H, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_0, offsetof(struct bpf_sock, src_ip4) + 2),
	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6),
	BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_sk_release),
	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
	},
	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
	.result = ACCEPT,
},

The above test loads 2 bytes from sk->src_ip4 where
sk is obtained by bpf_sk_lookup_tcp().

It hits an internal verifier error from convert_ctx_accesses():
[root@arch-fb-vm1 bpf]# ./test_verifier 665 665
Failed to load prog 'Invalid argument'!
0: (b7) r2 = 0
1: (63) *(u32 *)(r10 -8) = r2
2: (7b) *(u64 *)(r10 -16) = r2
3: (7b) *(u64 *)(r10 -24) = r2
4: (7b) *(u64 *)(r10 -32) = r2
5: (7b) *(u64 *)(r10 -40) = r2
6: (7b) *(u64 *)(r10 -48) = r2
7: (bf) r2 = r10
8: (07) r2 += -48
9: (b7) r3 = 36
10: (b7) r4 = 0
11: (b7) r5 = 0
12: (85) call bpf_sk_lookup_tcp#84
13: (bf) r6 = r0
14: (15) if r0 == 0x0 goto pc+3
 R0=sock(id=1,off=0,imm=0) R6=sock(id=1,off=0,imm=0) R10=fp0,call_-1 fp-8=????0000 fp-16=0000mmmm fp-24=mmmmmmmm fp-32=mmmmmmmm fp-40=mmmmmmmm fp-48=mmmmmmmm refs=1
15: (69) r2 = *(u16 *)(r0 +26)
16: (bf) r1 = r6
17: (85) call bpf_sk_release#86
18: (95) exit

from 14 to 18: safe
processed 20 insns (limit 131072), stack depth 48
bpf verifier is misconfigured
Summary: 0 PASSED, 0 SKIPPED, 1 FAILED

The bpf_sock_is_valid_access() is expecting src_ip4 can be narrowly
loaded (meaning load any 1 or 2 bytes of the src_ip4) by
marking info->ctx_field_size.  However, this marked
ctx_field_size is not used.  This patch fixes it.

Due to the recent refactoring in test_verifier,
this new test will be added to the bpf-next branch
(together with the bpf_tcp_sock patchset)
to avoid merge conflict.

Fixes: c64b7983288e ("bpf: Add PTR_TO_SOCKET verifier type")
Cc: Joe Stringer <joe@wand.net.nz>
Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 11 +++++++----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 56674a7c3778..8f295b790297 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -1617,12 +1617,13 @@ static int check_flow_keys_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int off,
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int check_sock_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, int off,
-			     int size, enum bpf_access_type t)
+static int check_sock_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx,
+			     u32 regno, int off, int size,
+			     enum bpf_access_type t)
 {
 	struct bpf_reg_state *regs = cur_regs(env);
 	struct bpf_reg_state *reg = &regs[regno];
-	struct bpf_insn_access_aux info;
+	struct bpf_insn_access_aux info = {};
 
 	if (reg->smin_value < 0) {
 		verbose(env, "R%d min value is negative, either use unsigned index or do a if (index >=0) check.\n",
@@ -1636,6 +1637,8 @@ static int check_sock_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, int off,
 		return -EACCES;
 	}
 
+	env->insn_aux_data[insn_idx].ctx_field_size = info.ctx_field_size;
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -2032,7 +2035,7 @@ static int check_mem_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, u32 regn
 			verbose(env, "cannot write into socket\n");
 			return -EACCES;
 		}
-		err = check_sock_access(env, regno, off, size, t);
+		err = check_sock_access(env, insn_idx, regno, off, size, t);
 		if (!err && value_regno >= 0)
 			mark_reg_unknown(env, regs, value_regno);
 	} else {
-- 
2.17.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread