netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk
Cc: andrew@lunn.ch, vivien.didelot@gmail.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com,
	robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Rasmus.Villemoes@prevas.se
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 00/10] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: support for mv88e6250
Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2019 20:11:22 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190604.201122.810789004477157679.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190604073412.21743-1-rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk>

From: Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk>
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2019 07:34:22 +0000

> This adds support for the mv88e6250 chip. Initially based on the
> mv88e6240, this time around, I've been through each ->ops callback and
> checked that it makes sense, either replacing with a 6250 specific
> variant or dropping it if no equivalent functionality seems to exist
> for the 6250. Along the way, I found a few oddities in the existing
> code, mostly sent as separate patches/questions.
> 
> The one relevant to the 6250 is the ieee_pri_map callback, where the
> existing mv88e6085_g1_ieee_pri_map() is actually wrong for many of the
> existing users. I've put the mv88e6250_g1_ieee_pri_map() patch first
> in case some of the existing chips get switched over to use that and
> it is deemed important enough for -stable.
 ...

Series applied, thanks.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2019-06-05  3:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-06-04  7:34 [PATCH net-next v4 00/10] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: support for mv88e6250 Rasmus Villemoes
2019-06-04  7:34 ` [PATCH net-next v4 01/10] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: add mv88e6250_g1_ieee_pri_map Rasmus Villemoes
2019-06-04  7:34 ` [PATCH net-next v4 02/10] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: introduce support for two chips using direct smi addressing Rasmus Villemoes
2019-06-04  7:34 ` [PATCH net-next v4 03/10] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: prepare mv88e6xxx_g1_atu_op() for the mv88e6250 Rasmus Villemoes
2019-06-04  7:34 ` [PATCH net-next v4 04/10] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: implement vtu_getnext and vtu_loadpurge for mv88e6250 Rasmus Villemoes
2019-06-04  7:34 ` [PATCH net-next v4 05/10] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: implement watchdog_ops " Rasmus Villemoes
2019-06-04  7:34 ` [PATCH net-next v4 06/10] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: implement port_set_speed " Rasmus Villemoes
2019-06-04  7:34 ` [PATCH net-next v4 07/10] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: implement port_link_state " Rasmus Villemoes
2019-06-04  7:34 ` [PATCH net-next v4 08/10] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: add support " Rasmus Villemoes
2019-06-04  7:34 ` [PATCH net-next v4 09/10] dt-bindings: net: dsa: marvell: add "marvell,mv88e6250" compatible string Rasmus Villemoes
2019-06-04  7:34 ` [PATCH net-next v4 10/10] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: refactor mv88e6352_g1_reset Rasmus Villemoes
2019-06-05  3:11 ` David Miller [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190604.201122.810789004477157679.davem@davemloft.net \
    --to=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=Rasmus.Villemoes@prevas.se \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rasmus.villemoes@prevas.dk \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).