netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
To: Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@waldekranz.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org, vivien.didelot@gmail.com,
	f.fainelli@gmail.com, j.vosburgh@gmail.com, vfalico@gmail.com,
	andy@greyhouse.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next 2/4] net: dsa: Link aggregation support
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2020 02:35:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201204003527.uvwyem3mlacr5cjp@skbuf> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <877dpy7eun.fsf@waldekranz.com>

On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 10:35:12PM +0100, Tobias Waldekranz wrote:
> - If offloading is available, reject anything that can not be
>   offloaded. My guess is that _any_ hardware offloaded setup will almost
>   always yield a better solution for the user than a software fallback.

For the case where the switch ports are not bridged, just under a bond,
do you expect the hardware offloading to make any sort of difference?
If you don't, then why would we deny software-applied bonding policies?

  reply	other threads:[~2020-12-04  0:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 59+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-02  9:13 [PATCH v3 net-next 0/4] net: dsa: Link aggregation support Tobias Waldekranz
2020-12-02  9:13 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 1/4] net: bonding: Notify ports about their initial state Tobias Waldekranz
2020-12-02 19:09   ` Jay Vosburgh
2020-12-02 21:52     ` Tobias Waldekranz
2020-12-03  0:39       ` Jay Vosburgh
2020-12-03  8:16         ` Tobias Waldekranz
2020-12-02  9:13 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 2/4] net: dsa: Link aggregation support Tobias Waldekranz
2020-12-02 10:07   ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-12-02 10:51     ` Tobias Waldekranz
2020-12-02 18:58   ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-12-02 21:29     ` Tobias Waldekranz
2020-12-02 21:32       ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-12-03 16:24   ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-12-03 20:53     ` Tobias Waldekranz
2020-12-03 21:09       ` Andrew Lunn
2020-12-03 21:35         ` Tobias Waldekranz
2020-12-04  0:35           ` Vladimir Oltean [this message]
2020-12-03 21:57       ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-12-03 23:12         ` Tobias Waldekranz
2020-12-04  0:56           ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-12-07 21:49             ` Tobias Waldekranz
2020-12-04  1:33         ` Andrew Lunn
2020-12-04  4:18           ` Florian Fainelli
2020-12-07 21:56             ` Tobias Waldekranz
2020-12-03 20:48   ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-12-04  2:20   ` Andrew Lunn
2020-12-07 21:19     ` Tobias Waldekranz
2020-12-07 23:26       ` Andrew Lunn
2020-12-09  8:57         ` Tobias Waldekranz
2020-12-09 14:27           ` Andrew Lunn
2020-12-09 15:21             ` Tobias Waldekranz
2020-12-09 23:03               ` Andrew Lunn
2020-12-04  4:04   ` Florian Fainelli
2020-12-08 11:23   ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-12-08 15:33     ` Tobias Waldekranz
2020-12-08 16:37       ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-12-09  8:37         ` Tobias Waldekranz
2020-12-09 10:53           ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-12-09 14:11             ` Tobias Waldekranz
2020-12-09 16:04               ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-12-09 22:01                 ` Tobias Waldekranz
2020-12-09 22:21                   ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-12-10 10:18                     ` Tobias Waldekranz
2020-12-09 22:59                 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-12-10  1:05                   ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-12-09 14:23             ` Andrew Lunn
2020-12-09 23:17               ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-12-08 17:26     ` Andrew Lunn
2020-12-11 20:50     ` Tobias Waldekranz
2020-12-12 14:26       ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-12-13 21:18         ` Tobias Waldekranz
2020-12-14  0:12           ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-12-14 11:42             ` Ido Schimmel
2020-12-16 15:15               ` Tobias Waldekranz
2020-12-16 18:48                 ` Ido Schimmel
2020-12-14  9:41           ` Tobias Waldekranz
2020-12-02  9:13 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 3/4] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: " Tobias Waldekranz
2020-12-02  9:13 ` [PATCH v3 net-next 4/4] net: dsa: tag_dsa: Support reception of packets from LAG devices Tobias Waldekranz
2020-12-04  3:58   ` Florian Fainelli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201204003527.uvwyem3mlacr5cjp@skbuf \
    --to=olteanv@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=andy@greyhouse.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=j.vosburgh@gmail.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tobias@waldekranz.com \
    --cc=vfalico@gmail.com \
    --cc=vivien.didelot@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).