netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
To: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <ast@fb.com>,
	<daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: <andrii@kernel.org>, <kernel-team@fb.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 15/17] selftests/bpf: add function linking selftest
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 13:01:44 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210414200146.2663044-16-andrii@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210414200146.2663044-1-andrii@kernel.org>

Add selftest validating various aspects of statically linking functions:
  - no conflicts and correct resolution for name-conflicting static funcs;
  - correct resolution of extern functions;
  - correct handling of weak functions, both resolution itself and libbpf's
    handling of unused weak function that "lost" (it leaves gaps in code with
    no ELF symbols);
  - correct handling of hidden visibility to turn global function into
    "static" for the purpose of BPF verification.

Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile          |  3 +-
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/linked_funcs.c   | 42 +++++++++++
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/linked_funcs1.c       | 73 +++++++++++++++++++
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/linked_funcs2.c       | 73 +++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 190 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/linked_funcs.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/linked_funcs1.c
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/linked_funcs2.c

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
index cfa3e91c9a49..c5d25aef1074 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/Makefile
@@ -303,9 +303,10 @@ endef
 
 SKEL_BLACKLIST := btf__% test_pinning_invalid.c test_sk_assign.c
 
-LINKED_SKELS := test_static_linked.skel.h
+LINKED_SKELS := test_static_linked.skel.h linked_funcs.skel.h
 
 test_static_linked.skel.h-deps := test_static_linked1.o test_static_linked2.o
+linked_funcs.skel.h-deps := linked_funcs1.o linked_funcs2.o
 
 LINKED_BPF_SRCS := $(patsubst %.o,%.c,$(foreach skel,$(LINKED_SKELS),$($(skel)-deps)))
 
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/linked_funcs.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/linked_funcs.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..768166a7c534
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/linked_funcs.c
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2021 Facebook */
+
+#include <test_progs.h>
+#include <sys/syscall.h>
+#include "linked_funcs.skel.h"
+
+void test_linked_funcs(void)
+{
+	int err;
+	struct linked_funcs* skel;
+
+	skel = linked_funcs__open();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "skel_open"))
+		return;
+
+	skel->rodata->my_tid = syscall(SYS_gettid);
+	skel->rodata->syscall_id = SYS_getpgid;
+
+	err = linked_funcs__load(skel);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "skel_load"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	err = linked_funcs__attach(skel);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "skel_attach"))
+		goto cleanup;
+
+	/* trigger */
+	syscall(SYS_getpgid);
+
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->output_val1, 2000 + 2000, "output_val1");
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->output_ctx1, SYS_getpgid, "output_ctx1");
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->output_weak1, 42, "output_weak1");
+
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->output_val2, 2 * 1000 + 2 * (2 * 1000), "output_val2");
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->output_ctx2, SYS_getpgid, "output_ctx2");
+	/* output_weak2 should never be updated */
+	ASSERT_EQ(skel->bss->output_weak2, 0, "output_weak2");
+
+cleanup:
+	linked_funcs__destroy(skel);
+}
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/linked_funcs1.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/linked_funcs1.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..cc621d4e4d82
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/linked_funcs1.c
@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2021 Facebook */
+
+#include "vmlinux.h"
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
+
+/* weak and shared between two files */
+const volatile int my_tid __weak = 0;
+const volatile long syscall_id __weak = 0;
+
+int output_val1 = 0;
+int output_ctx1 = 0;
+int output_weak1 = 0;
+
+/* same "subprog" name in all files, but it's ok because they all are static */
+static __noinline int subprog(int x)
+{
+	/* but different formula */
+	return x * 1;
+}
+
+/* Global functions can't be void */
+int set_output_val1(int x)
+{
+	output_val1 = x + subprog(x);
+	return x;
+}
+
+/* This function can't be verified as global, as it assumes raw_tp/sys_enter
+ * context and accesses syscall id (second argument). So we mark it as
+ * __hidden, so that libbpf will mark it as static in the final object file,
+ * right before verifying it in the kernel.
+ *
+ * But we don't mark it as __hidden here, rather at extern site. __hidden is
+ * "contaminating" visibility, so it will get propagated from either extern or
+ * actual definition (including from the losing __weak definition).
+ */
+void set_output_ctx1(__u64 *ctx)
+{
+	output_ctx1 = ctx[1]; /* long id, same as in BPF_PROG below */
+}
+
+/* this weak instance should win because it's the first one */
+__weak int set_output_weak(int x)
+{
+	output_weak1 = x;
+	return x;
+}
+
+extern int set_output_val2(int x);
+
+/* here we'll force set_output_ctx2() to be __hidden in the final obj file */
+__hidden extern void set_output_ctx2(__u64 *ctx);
+
+SEC("raw_tp/sys_enter")
+int BPF_PROG(handler1, struct pt_regs *regs, long id)
+{
+	if (my_tid != (u32)bpf_get_current_pid_tgid() || id != syscall_id)
+		return 0;
+
+	set_output_val2(1000);
+	set_output_ctx2(ctx); /* ctx definition is hidden in BPF_PROG macro */
+
+	/* keep input value the same across both files to avoid dependency on
+	 * handler call order; differentiate by output_weak1 vs output_weak2.
+	 */
+	set_output_weak(42);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+char LICENSE[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/linked_funcs2.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/linked_funcs2.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..a5a935a4f748
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/linked_funcs2.c
@@ -0,0 +1,73 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Copyright (c) 2021 Facebook */
+
+#include "vmlinux.h"
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
+
+/* weak and shared between both files */
+const volatile int my_tid __weak = 0;
+const volatile long syscall_id __weak = 0;
+
+int output_val2 = 0;
+int output_ctx2 = 0;
+int output_weak2 = 0; /* should stay zero */
+
+/* same "subprog" name in all files, but it's ok because they all are static */
+static __noinline int subprog(int x)
+{
+	/* but different formula */
+	return x * 2;
+}
+
+/* Global functions can't be void */
+int set_output_val2(int x)
+{
+	output_val2 = 2 * x + 2 * subprog(x);
+	return 2 * x;
+}
+
+/* This function can't be verified as global, as it assumes raw_tp/sys_enter
+ * context and accesses syscall id (second argument). So we mark it as
+ * __hidden, so that libbpf will mark it as static in the final object file,
+ * right before verifying it in the kernel.
+ *
+ * But we don't mark it as __hidden here, rather at extern site. __hidden is
+ * "contaminating" visibility, so it will get propagated from either extern or
+ * actual definition (including from the losing __weak definition).
+ */
+void set_output_ctx2(__u64 *ctx)
+{
+	output_ctx2 = ctx[1]; /* long id, same as in BPF_PROG below */
+}
+
+/* this weak instance should lose, because it will be processed second */
+__weak int set_output_weak(int x)
+{
+	output_weak2 = x;
+	return 2 * x;
+}
+
+extern int set_output_val1(int x);
+
+/* here we'll force set_output_ctx1() to be __hidden in the final obj file */
+__hidden extern void set_output_ctx1(__u64 *ctx);
+
+SEC("raw_tp/sys_enter")
+int BPF_PROG(handler2, struct pt_regs *regs, long id)
+{
+	if (my_tid != (u32)bpf_get_current_pid_tgid() || id != syscall_id)
+		return 0;
+
+	set_output_val1(2000);
+	set_output_ctx1(ctx); /* ctx definition is hidden in BPF_PROG macro */
+
+	/* keep input value the same across both files to avoid dependency on
+	 * handler call order; differentiate by output_weak1 vs output_weak2.
+	 */
+	set_output_weak(42);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+char LICENSE[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
-- 
2.30.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-04-14 20:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-14 20:01 [PATCH bpf-next 00/17] BPF static linker: support externs Andrii Nakryiko
2021-04-14 20:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next 01/17] bpftool: support dumping BTF VAR's "extern" linkage Andrii Nakryiko
2021-04-14 20:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next 02/17] bpftool: dump more info about DATASEC members Andrii Nakryiko
2021-04-14 20:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next 03/17] libbpf: suppress compiler warning when using SEC() macro with externs Andrii Nakryiko
2021-04-14 20:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next 04/17] libbpf: mark BPF subprogs with hidden visibility as static for BPF verifier Andrii Nakryiko
2021-04-14 20:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next 05/17] libbpf: allow gaps in BPF program sections to support overriden weak functions Andrii Nakryiko
2021-04-14 20:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next 06/17] libbpf: refactor BTF map definition parsing Andrii Nakryiko
2021-04-14 20:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next 07/17] libbpf: factor out symtab and relos sanity checks Andrii Nakryiko
2021-04-14 20:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next 08/17] libbpf: make few internal helpers available outside of libbpf.c Andrii Nakryiko
2021-04-14 20:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next 09/17] libbpf: extend sanity checking ELF symbols with externs validation Andrii Nakryiko
2021-04-14 20:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next 10/17] libbpf: tighten BTF type ID rewriting with error checking Andrii Nakryiko
2021-04-14 20:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next 11/17] libbpf: add linker extern resolution support for functions and global variables Andrii Nakryiko
2021-04-14 20:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next 12/17] libbpf: support extern resolution for BTF-defined maps in .maps section Andrii Nakryiko
2021-04-14 22:00   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2021-04-14 23:48     ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-04-15  2:01       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2021-04-15 20:35         ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-04-15 20:57           ` Alexei Starovoitov
2021-04-14 20:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next 13/17] selftests/bpf: use -O0 instead of -Og in selftests builds Andrii Nakryiko
2021-04-14 22:02   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2021-04-14 22:15   ` David Laight
2021-04-15  0:03     ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-04-14 20:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next 14/17] selftests/bpf: omit skeleton generation for multi-linked BPF object files Andrii Nakryiko
2021-04-14 20:01 ` Andrii Nakryiko [this message]
2021-04-14 20:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next 16/17] selftests/bpf: add global variables linking selftest Andrii Nakryiko
2021-04-14 20:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next 17/17] sleftests/bpf: add map " Andrii Nakryiko
2021-04-15  0:21 ` [PATCH bpf-next 00/17] BPF static linker: support externs Andrii Nakryiko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210414200146.2663044-16-andrii@kernel.org \
    --to=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@fb.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).