* [PATCH net] vrf: Increment Icmp6InMsgs on the original netdev
@ 2019-05-30 5:08 Stephen Suryaputra
2019-05-31 21:32 ` David Miller
2019-05-31 23:06 ` David Ahern
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Suryaputra @ 2019-05-30 5:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: netdev; +Cc: Stephen Suryaputra
Get the ingress interface and increment ICMP counters based on that
instead of skb->dev when the the dev is a VRF device.
This is a follow up on the following message:
https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg560268.html
Signed-off-by: Stephen Suryaputra <ssuryaextr@gmail.com>
---
net/ipv6/icmp.c | 17 +++++++++++------
net/ipv6/reassembly.c | 3 +++
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv6/icmp.c b/net/ipv6/icmp.c
index 802faa2fcc0e..f54191cd1d7b 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/icmp.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/icmp.c
@@ -398,23 +398,28 @@ static struct dst_entry *icmpv6_route_lookup(struct net *net,
return ERR_PTR(err);
}
-static int icmp6_iif(const struct sk_buff *skb)
+static struct net_device *icmp6_dev(const struct sk_buff *skb)
{
- int iif = skb->dev->ifindex;
+ struct net_device *dev = skb->dev;
/* for local traffic to local address, skb dev is the loopback
* device. Check if there is a dst attached to the skb and if so
* get the real device index. Same is needed for replies to a link
* local address on a device enslaved to an L3 master device
*/
- if (unlikely(iif == LOOPBACK_IFINDEX || netif_is_l3_master(skb->dev))) {
+ if (unlikely(dev->ifindex == LOOPBACK_IFINDEX || netif_is_l3_master(skb->dev))) {
const struct rt6_info *rt6 = skb_rt6_info(skb);
if (rt6)
- iif = rt6->rt6i_idev->dev->ifindex;
+ dev = rt6->rt6i_idev->dev;
}
- return iif;
+ return dev;
+}
+
+static int icmp6_iif(const struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ return icmp6_dev(skb)->ifindex;
}
/*
@@ -801,7 +806,7 @@ void icmpv6_notify(struct sk_buff *skb, u8 type, u8 code, __be32 info)
static int icmpv6_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb)
{
struct net *net = dev_net(skb->dev);
- struct net_device *dev = skb->dev;
+ struct net_device *dev = icmp6_dev(skb);
struct inet6_dev *idev = __in6_dev_get(dev);
const struct in6_addr *saddr, *daddr;
struct icmp6hdr *hdr;
diff --git a/net/ipv6/reassembly.c b/net/ipv6/reassembly.c
index 1a832f5e190b..9b365c345c34 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/reassembly.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/reassembly.c
@@ -260,6 +260,9 @@ static int ip6_frag_reasm(struct frag_queue *fq, struct sk_buff *skb,
int payload_len;
u8 ecn;
+ if (netif_is_l3_master(dev))
+ dev = dev_get_by_index_rcu(net, inet6_iif(skb));
+
inet_frag_kill(&fq->q);
ecn = ip_frag_ecn_table[fq->ecn];
--
2.17.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net] vrf: Increment Icmp6InMsgs on the original netdev
2019-05-30 5:08 [PATCH net] vrf: Increment Icmp6InMsgs on the original netdev Stephen Suryaputra
@ 2019-05-31 21:32 ` David Miller
2019-05-31 23:06 ` David Ahern
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2019-05-31 21:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ssuryaextr; +Cc: netdev, dsahern, dsahern
From: Stephen Suryaputra <ssuryaextr@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2019 01:08:15 -0400
> Get the ingress interface and increment ICMP counters based on that
> instead of skb->dev when the the dev is a VRF device.
>
> This is a follow up on the following message:
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg560268.html
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Suryaputra <ssuryaextr@gmail.com>
David, please review.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net] vrf: Increment Icmp6InMsgs on the original netdev
2019-05-30 5:08 [PATCH net] vrf: Increment Icmp6InMsgs on the original netdev Stephen Suryaputra
2019-05-31 21:32 ` David Miller
@ 2019-05-31 23:06 ` David Ahern
2019-06-01 18:14 ` Stephen Suryaputra
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: David Ahern @ 2019-05-31 23:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Suryaputra, netdev
On 5/29/19 11:08 PM, Stephen Suryaputra wrote:
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/reassembly.c b/net/ipv6/reassembly.c
> index 1a832f5e190b..9b365c345c34 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/reassembly.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/reassembly.c
> @@ -260,6 +260,9 @@ static int ip6_frag_reasm(struct frag_queue *fq, struct sk_buff *skb,
> int payload_len;
> u8 ecn;
>
> + if (netif_is_l3_master(dev))
> + dev = dev_get_by_index_rcu(net, inet6_iif(skb));
> +
> inet_frag_kill(&fq->q);
>
> ecn = ip_frag_ecn_table[fq->ecn];
>
this part changes skb->dev. Seems like it has an unintended effect if
the packet is delivered locally.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net] vrf: Increment Icmp6InMsgs on the original netdev
2019-05-31 23:06 ` David Ahern
@ 2019-06-01 18:14 ` Stephen Suryaputra
2019-06-06 16:25 ` David Ahern
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Suryaputra @ 2019-06-01 18:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Ahern; +Cc: netdev
On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 05:06:16PM -0600, David Ahern wrote:
> On 5/29/19 11:08 PM, Stephen Suryaputra wrote:
> > diff --git a/net/ipv6/reassembly.c b/net/ipv6/reassembly.c
> > index 1a832f5e190b..9b365c345c34 100644
> > --- a/net/ipv6/reassembly.c
> > +++ b/net/ipv6/reassembly.c
> > @@ -260,6 +260,9 @@ static int ip6_frag_reasm(struct frag_queue *fq, struct sk_buff *skb,
> > int payload_len;
> > u8 ecn;
> >
> > + if (netif_is_l3_master(dev))
> > + dev = dev_get_by_index_rcu(net, inet6_iif(skb));
> > +
> > inet_frag_kill(&fq->q);
> >
> > ecn = ip_frag_ecn_table[fq->ecn];
> >
>
> this part changes skb->dev. Seems like it has an unintended effect if
> the packet is delivered locally.
Ah, right. How about this then?
+/**
+ * __in6_dev_stats_get - get inet6_dev pointer for stats
+ * @dev: network device
+ * @skb: skb for original incoming interface if neeeded
+ *
+ * Caller must hold rcu_read_lock or RTNL, because this function
+ * does not take a reference on the inet6_dev.
+ */
+static inline struct inet6_dev *__in6_dev_stats_get(const struct net_device *dev,
+ const struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ if (netif_is_l3_master(dev))
+ dev = dev_get_by_index_rcu(dev_net(dev), inet6_iif(skb));
+ return __in6_dev_get(dev);
+}
@@ -260,9 +260,6 @@ static int ip6_frag_reasm(struct frag_queue *fq, struct sk_buff *skb,
int payload_len;
u8 ecn;
- if (netif_is_l3_master(dev))
- dev = dev_get_by_index_rcu(net, inet6_iif(skb));
-
inet_frag_kill(&fq->q);
ecn = ip_frag_ecn_table[fq->ecn];
@@ -305,7 +302,7 @@ static int ip6_frag_reasm(struct frag_queue *fq, struct sk_buff *skb,
skb_network_header_len(skb));
rcu_read_lock();
- __IP6_INC_STATS(net, __in6_dev_get(dev), IPSTATS_MIB_REASMOKS);
+ __IP6_INC_STATS(net, __in6_dev_stats_get(dev, skb), IPSTATS_MIB_REASMOKS);
rcu_read_unlock();
fq->q.rb_fragments = RB_ROOT;
fq->q.fragments_tail = NULL;
@@ -319,7 +316,7 @@ static int ip6_frag_reasm(struct frag_queue *fq, struct sk_buff *skb,
net_dbg_ratelimited("ip6_frag_reasm: no memory for reassembly\n");
out_fail:
rcu_read_lock();
- __IP6_INC_STATS(net, __in6_dev_get(dev), IPSTATS_MIB_REASMFAILS);
+ __IP6_INC_STATS(net, __in6_dev_stats_get(dev, skb), IPSTATS_MIB_REASMFAILS);
rcu_read_unlock();
inet_frag_kill(&fq->q);
return -1;
Thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net] vrf: Increment Icmp6InMsgs on the original netdev
2019-06-01 18:14 ` Stephen Suryaputra
@ 2019-06-06 16:25 ` David Ahern
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: David Ahern @ 2019-06-06 16:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Suryaputra; +Cc: netdev
On 6/1/19 12:14 PM, Stephen Suryaputra wrote:
> On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 05:06:16PM -0600, David Ahern wrote:
>> On 5/29/19 11:08 PM, Stephen Suryaputra wrote:
>>> diff --git a/net/ipv6/reassembly.c b/net/ipv6/reassembly.c
>>> index 1a832f5e190b..9b365c345c34 100644
>>> --- a/net/ipv6/reassembly.c
>>> +++ b/net/ipv6/reassembly.c
>>> @@ -260,6 +260,9 @@ static int ip6_frag_reasm(struct frag_queue *fq, struct sk_buff *skb,
>>> int payload_len;
>>> u8 ecn;
>>>
>>> + if (netif_is_l3_master(dev))
>>> + dev = dev_get_by_index_rcu(net, inet6_iif(skb));
>>> +
>>> inet_frag_kill(&fq->q);
>>>
>>> ecn = ip_frag_ecn_table[fq->ecn];
>>>
>>
>> this part changes skb->dev. Seems like it has an unintended effect if
>> the packet is delivered locally.
>
> Ah, right. How about this then?
>
looks ok to me.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-06-06 16:25 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-05-30 5:08 [PATCH net] vrf: Increment Icmp6InMsgs on the original netdev Stephen Suryaputra
2019-05-31 21:32 ` David Miller
2019-05-31 23:06 ` David Ahern
2019-06-01 18:14 ` Stephen Suryaputra
2019-06-06 16:25 ` David Ahern
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).