From: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Alexander Duyck <alexanderduyck@fb.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: avoid 32 x truesize under-estimation for tiny skbs
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 10:00:31 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKgT0UeyiQdHASed8x5Lkn1cfq58j6OLsM8n993V9i9XDJqiiQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210113161819.1155526-1-eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 8:20 AM Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
>
> Both virtio net and napi_get_frags() allocate skbs
> with a very small skb->head
>
> While using page fragments instead of a kmalloc backed skb->head might give
> a small performance improvement in some cases, there is a huge risk of
> under estimating memory usage.
>
> For both GOOD_COPY_LEN and GRO_MAX_HEAD, we can fit at least 32 allocations
> per page (order-3 page in x86), or even 64 on PowerPC
>
> We have been tracking OOM issues on GKE hosts hitting tcp_mem limits
> but consuming far more memory for TCP buffers than instructed in tcp_mem[2]
>
> Even if we force napi_alloc_skb() to only use order-0 pages, the issue
> would still be there on arches with PAGE_SIZE >= 32768
>
> This patch makes sure that small skb head are kmalloc backed, so that
> other objects in the slab page can be reused instead of being held as long
> as skbs are sitting in socket queues.
>
> Note that we might in the future use the sk_buff napi cache,
> instead of going through a more expensive __alloc_skb()
>
> Another idea would be to use separate page sizes depending
> on the allocated length (to never have more than 4 frags per page)
>
> I would like to thank Greg Thelen for his precious help on this matter,
> analysing crash dumps is always a time consuming task.
>
> Fixes: fd11a83dd363 ("net: Pull out core bits of __netdev_alloc_skb and add __napi_alloc_skb")
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> Cc: Alexander Duyck <alexanderduyck@fb.com>
> Cc: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
> Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> Cc: Greg Thelen <gthelen@google.com>
> ---
> net/core/skbuff.c | 9 +++++++--
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
> index 7626a33cce590e530f36167bd096026916131897..3a8f55a43e6964344df464a27b9b1faa0eb804f3 100644
> --- a/net/core/skbuff.c
> +++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
> @@ -501,13 +501,17 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__netdev_alloc_skb);
> struct sk_buff *__napi_alloc_skb(struct napi_struct *napi, unsigned int len,
> gfp_t gfp_mask)
> {
> - struct napi_alloc_cache *nc = this_cpu_ptr(&napi_alloc_cache);
> + struct napi_alloc_cache *nc;
> struct sk_buff *skb;
> void *data;
>
> len += NET_SKB_PAD + NET_IP_ALIGN;
>
> - if ((len > SKB_WITH_OVERHEAD(PAGE_SIZE)) ||
> + /* If requested length is either too small or too big,
> + * we use kmalloc() for skb->head allocation.
> + */
> + if (len <= SKB_WITH_OVERHEAD(1024) ||
> + len > SKB_WITH_OVERHEAD(PAGE_SIZE) ||
> (gfp_mask & (__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM | GFP_DMA))) {
> skb = __alloc_skb(len, gfp_mask, SKB_ALLOC_RX, NUMA_NO_NODE);
> if (!skb)
> @@ -515,6 +519,7 @@ struct sk_buff *__napi_alloc_skb(struct napi_struct *napi, unsigned int len,
> goto skb_success;
> }
>
> + nc = this_cpu_ptr(&napi_alloc_cache);
> len += SKB_DATA_ALIGN(sizeof(struct skb_shared_info));
> len = SKB_DATA_ALIGN(len);
>
The fix here looks good to me.
Reviewed-by: Alexander Duyck <alexanderduyck@fb.com>
I think at some point in the future we may need to follow up and do a
rework of a bunch of this code. One thing I am wondering is if we
should look at doing some sort of memory accounting per napi_struct.
Maybe it is something we could work on tying into the page pool work
that Jesper did earlier.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-13 18:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-13 16:18 [PATCH net] net: avoid 32 x truesize under-estimation for tiny skbs Eric Dumazet
2021-01-13 18:00 ` Alexander Duyck [this message]
2021-01-13 19:19 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-01-13 22:23 ` David Laight
2021-01-14 5:16 ` Eric Dumazet
2021-01-14 9:29 ` David Laight
2021-01-14 19:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
[not found] ` <1617007696.5731978-1-xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
2021-03-29 9:06 ` Eric Dumazet
2021-03-31 8:11 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-03-31 8:36 ` Eric Dumazet
2021-03-31 8:46 ` Eric Dumazet
2021-03-31 8:49 ` Eric Dumazet
2021-03-31 8:54 ` Eric Dumazet
[not found] ` <1617248264.4993114-2-xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
2021-04-01 5:06 ` Eric Dumazet
[not found] ` <1617357110.3822439-1-xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
2021-04-02 12:52 ` Eric Dumazet
2021-04-01 13:51 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2021-04-01 14:08 ` Eric Dumazet
2021-04-01 7:14 ` Jason Wang
[not found] ` <1617267183.5697193-1-xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
2021-04-01 9:58 ` Eric Dumazet
2021-04-02 2:52 ` Jason Wang
[not found] ` <1617361253.1788838-2-xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
2021-04-02 12:53 ` Eric Dumazet
2021-04-06 2:04 ` Jason Wang
[not found] ` <1617190239.1035674-1-xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
2021-03-31 12:08 ` Eric Dumazet
2021-04-01 13:36 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-09-07 20:19 ` Paolo Abeni
2022-09-07 20:40 ` Eric Dumazet
2022-09-08 10:48 ` Paolo Abeni
2022-09-08 12:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2022-09-08 14:26 ` Paolo Abeni
2022-09-08 16:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2022-09-07 21:36 ` Alexander H Duyck
2022-09-08 11:00 ` Paolo Abeni
2022-09-08 14:53 ` Alexander H Duyck
2022-09-08 18:01 ` Paolo Abeni
2022-09-08 19:26 ` Alexander Duyck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAKgT0UeyiQdHASed8x5Lkn1cfq58j6OLsM8n993V9i9XDJqiiQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
--cc=alexanderduyck@fb.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=gthelen@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).