From: Parav Pandit <parav@nvidia.com>
To: "Zhu, Lingshan" <lingshan.zhu@intel.com>,
"jasowang@redhat.com" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
"mst@redhat.com" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: "virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"xieyongji@bytedance.com" <xieyongji@bytedance.com>,
"gautam.dawar@amd.com" <gautam.dawar@amd.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V3 5/6] vDPA: answer num of queue pairs = 1 to userspace when VIRTIO_NET_F_MQ == 0
Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2022 03:06:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <PH0PR12MB5481E65037E0B4F6F583193BDC899@PH0PR12MB5481.namprd12.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c7c8f49c-484f-f5b3-39e6-0d17f396cca7@intel.com>
> From: Zhu, Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@intel.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2022 11:03 PM
>
>
> On 7/13/2022 12:48 AM, Parav Pandit wrote:
> >> From: Zhu, Lingshan <lingshan.zhu@intel.com>
> >> Sent: Sunday, July 10, 2022 10:30 PM
> >>> Showing max_vq_pairs of 1 even when _MQ is not negotiated,
> >>> incorrectly
> >> says that max_vq_pairs is exposed to the guest, but it is not offered.
> >>> So, please fix the iproute2 to not print max_vq_pairs when it is not
> >> returned by the kernel.
> >> iproute2 can report whether there is MQ feature in the device /
> >> driver feature bits.
> >> I think iproute2 only queries the number of max queues here.
> >>
> >> max_vq_pairs shows how many queue pairs there, this attribute's
> >> existence does not depend on MQ, if no MQ, there are still one queue
> >> pair, so just show one.
> > This netlink attribute's existence is depending on the _MQ feature bit
> existence.
> why? If no MQ, then no queues?
> > We can break that and report the value, but if we break that there are
> many other config space bits who doesn’t have good default like
> max_vq_pairs.
> max_vq_paris may not have a default value, but we know if there is no MQ,
> a virtio-net still have one queue pair to be functional.
> > There is ambiguity for user space what to do with it and so in the kernel
> space..
> > Instead of dealing with them differently in kernel, at present we attach
> each netlink attribute to a respective feature bit wherever applicable.
> > And code in kernel and user space is uniform to handle them.
> I get your point, but you see, by "max_vq_pairs", the user space tool is
> asking how many queue pairs there, it is not asking whether the device have
> MQ.
> Even no _MQ, we still need to tell the users that there are one queue pair, or
> it is not a functional virtio-net, we should detect this error earlier in the
> device initialization.
It is not an error. :)
When the user space which invokes netlink commands, detects that _MQ is not supported, hence it takes max_queue_pair = 1 by itself.
>
> I think it is still uniform, it there is _MQ, we return cfg.max_queue_pair, if no
> _MQ, return 1, still by netlink.
Better to do that in user space because we cannot do same for other config fields.
>
> Thanks
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-13 3:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 113+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-07-01 13:28 [PATCH V3 0/6] ifcvf/vDPA: support query device config space through netlink Zhu Lingshan
2022-07-01 13:28 ` [PATCH V3 1/6] vDPA/ifcvf: get_config_size should return a value no greater than dev implementation Zhu Lingshan
2022-07-04 4:39 ` Jason Wang
2022-07-08 6:44 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2022-07-13 5:44 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-07-13 7:52 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2022-07-13 5:31 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-07-13 7:48 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2022-07-01 13:28 ` [PATCH V3 2/6] vDPA/ifcvf: support userspace to query features and MQ of a management device Zhu Lingshan
2022-07-04 4:43 ` Jason Wang
2022-07-08 6:54 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2022-07-01 13:28 ` [PATCH V3 3/6] vDPA: allow userspace to query features of a vDPA device Zhu Lingshan
2022-07-01 22:02 ` Parav Pandit
2022-07-04 4:46 ` Jason Wang
2022-07-04 12:53 ` Parav Pandit
2022-07-05 7:59 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2022-07-05 11:56 ` Parav Pandit
2022-07-05 16:56 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2022-07-05 17:01 ` Parav Pandit
2022-07-06 2:25 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2022-07-06 2:28 ` Parav Pandit
2022-07-23 11:27 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2022-07-24 15:23 ` Parav Pandit
2022-07-27 8:15 ` Si-Wei Liu
2022-07-27 11:38 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2022-07-08 6:16 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2022-07-08 16:13 ` Parav Pandit
2022-07-11 2:18 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2022-07-01 13:28 ` [PATCH V3 4/6] vDPA: !FEATURES_OK should not block querying device config space Zhu Lingshan
2022-07-01 22:12 ` Parav Pandit
2022-07-08 6:22 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2022-07-13 5:23 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-07-13 7:46 ` Zhu, Lingshan
[not found] ` <00889067-50ac-d2cd-675f-748f171e5c83@oracle.com>
[not found] ` <63242254-ba84-6810-dad8-34f900b97f2f@intel.com>
[not found] ` <8002554a-a77c-7b25-8f99-8d68248a741d@oracle.com>
2022-07-28 2:06 ` Jason Wang
2022-07-28 7:08 ` Si-Wei Liu
2022-07-28 7:36 ` Jason Wang
2022-07-28 7:44 ` Zhu, Lingshan
[not found] ` <2dfff5f3-3100-4a63-6da3-3e3d21ffb364@oracle.com>
2022-07-28 11:28 ` spec clarification (was Re: [PATCH V3 4/6] vDPA: !FEATURES_OK should not block querying device config space) Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-07-28 11:35 ` [PATCH V3 4/6] vDPA: !FEATURES_OK should not block querying device config space Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-07-28 22:12 ` Si-Wei Liu
[not found] ` <00e2e07e-1a2e-7af8-a060-cc9034e0d33f@intel.com>
[not found] ` <b58dba25-3258-d600-ea06-879094639852@oracle.com>
[not found] ` <c143e2da-208e-b046-9b8f-1780f75ed3e6@intel.com>
2022-07-29 20:55 ` Si-Wei Liu
2022-08-01 4:44 ` Jason Wang
2022-08-01 22:53 ` Si-Wei Liu
2022-08-01 22:58 ` Si-Wei Liu
2022-08-02 6:33 ` Jason Wang
2022-08-03 1:26 ` Si-Wei Liu
2022-08-03 2:30 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2022-08-03 23:09 ` Si-Wei Liu
2022-08-04 1:41 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2022-08-04 1:41 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2022-07-01 13:28 ` [PATCH V3 5/6] vDPA: answer num of queue pairs = 1 to userspace when VIRTIO_NET_F_MQ == 0 Zhu Lingshan
2022-07-01 22:07 ` Parav Pandit
2022-07-08 6:21 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2022-07-08 16:23 ` Parav Pandit
2022-07-11 2:29 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2022-07-12 16:48 ` Parav Pandit
2022-07-13 3:03 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2022-07-13 3:06 ` Parav Pandit [this message]
2022-07-13 3:45 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2022-07-26 15:56 ` Parav Pandit
2022-07-26 19:52 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-07-26 20:49 ` Parav Pandit
2022-07-27 2:14 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2022-07-27 2:17 ` Parav Pandit
2022-07-27 2:53 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2022-07-27 3:47 ` Parav Pandit
2022-07-27 4:24 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2022-07-27 6:01 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-07-27 6:25 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2022-07-27 6:56 ` Jason Wang
2022-07-27 9:05 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-07-27 6:54 ` Jason Wang
2022-07-27 9:02 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-07-27 9:50 ` Jason Wang
2022-07-27 15:45 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-07-28 1:21 ` Jason Wang
2022-07-28 3:46 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2022-07-28 5:53 ` Jason Wang
2022-07-28 6:02 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2022-07-28 6:41 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-08-01 4:50 ` Jason Wang
2022-07-27 7:50 ` Si-Wei Liu
2022-07-27 9:01 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-07-27 10:09 ` Si-Wei Liu
2022-07-27 11:54 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2022-07-28 1:41 ` Si-Wei Liu
2022-07-28 2:44 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2022-07-28 21:54 ` Si-Wei Liu
2022-07-29 2:07 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2022-07-27 15:48 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-07-13 5:26 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-07-13 7:47 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2022-07-26 15:54 ` Parav Pandit
2022-07-26 19:48 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-07-26 20:53 ` Parav Pandit
2022-07-27 1:56 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2022-07-27 2:11 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2022-07-01 13:28 ` [PATCH V3 6/6] vDPA: fix 'cast to restricted le16' warnings in vdpa.c Zhu Lingshan
2022-07-01 22:18 ` Parav Pandit
2022-07-08 6:25 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2022-07-08 16:08 ` Parav Pandit
2022-07-29 8:53 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-07-29 9:07 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2022-07-29 9:17 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-07-29 9:20 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2022-07-29 9:23 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-07-29 9:35 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2022-07-29 9:39 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-07-29 10:01 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2022-07-29 10:16 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2022-07-29 10:18 ` Zhu, Lingshan
2022-08-01 4:33 ` Jason Wang
2022-08-01 6:25 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=PH0PR12MB5481E65037E0B4F6F583193BDC899@PH0PR12MB5481.namprd12.prod.outlook.com \
--to=parav@nvidia.com \
--cc=gautam.dawar@amd.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=lingshan.zhu@intel.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=xieyongji@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).