From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@citrix.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@citrix.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>, Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr_tyshchenko@epam.com>,
Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com>,
Alex Chiang <achiang@hp.com>,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] ACPI: processor: Fix evaluating _PDC method when running as Xen dom0
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2023 10:14:09 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202303221035.BFY5kyh1-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230321141904.49177-1-roger.pau@citrix.com>
Hi Roger,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on xen-tip/linux-next]
[also build test ERROR on rafael-pm/linux-next linus/master v6.3-rc3 next-20230321]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Roger-Pau-Monne/ACPI-processor-Fix-evaluating-_PDC-method-when-running-as-Xen-dom0/20230321-221950
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/xen/tip.git linux-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230321141904.49177-1-roger.pau%40citrix.com
patch subject: [PATCH v5] ACPI: processor: Fix evaluating _PDC method when running as Xen dom0
config: x86_64-randconfig-a005 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230322/202303221035.BFY5kyh1-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 14.0.6 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project f28c006a5895fc0e329fe15fead81e37457cb1d1)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/4232c8b37a0415e1e828fef4ce522c93a0b925fc
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Roger-Pau-Monne/ACPI-processor-Fix-evaluating-_PDC-method-when-running-as-Xen-dom0/20230321-221950
git checkout 4232c8b37a0415e1e828fef4ce522c93a0b925fc
# save the config file
mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=x86_64 olddefconfig
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=x86_64 SHELL=/bin/bash
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Link: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202303221035.BFY5kyh1-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from arch/x86/xen/suspend_hvm.c:4:
>> include/xen/xen.h:79:2: error: implicit declaration of function 'BUG' is invalid in C99 [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
BUG();
^
1 error generated.
vim +/BUG +79 include/xen/xen.h
73
74 #if defined(CONFIG_XEN_DOM0) && defined(CONFIG_ACPI) && defined(CONFIG_X86)
75 bool __init xen_processor_present(uint32_t acpi_id);
76 #else
77 static inline bool xen_processor_present(uint32_t acpi_id)
78 {
> 79 BUG();
80 return false;
81 }
82 #endif
83
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests
next parent reply other threads:[~2023-03-22 2:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20230321141904.49177-1-roger.pau@citrix.com>
2023-03-22 2:14 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2023-03-22 3:47 ` [PATCH v5] ACPI: processor: Fix evaluating _PDC method when running as Xen dom0 kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202303221035.BFY5kyh1-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=achiang@hp.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=oleksandr_tyshchenko@epam.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=venkatesh.pallipadi@intel.com \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).