oe-kbuild-all.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [akpm-mm:mm-stable 219/240] mm/memory.c:5410:34: error: call to undeclared function 'vma_is_tcp'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations
@ 2023-08-12 11:40 kernel test robot
  2023-08-12 15:56 ` Matthew Wilcox
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2023-08-12 11:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)
  Cc: llvm, oe-kbuild-all, Andrew Morton, Linux Memory Management List,
	Suren Baghdasaryan

tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm.git mm-stable
head:   5fb2ea3111f4ecc6dc4891ce5b00f0217aae9a04
commit: 4aaa60dad4d1c96151dec51098aed866bb6e867d [219/240] mm: allow per-VMA locks on file-backed VMAs
config: s390-randconfig-r044-20230812 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230812/202308121909.XNYBtqNI-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 17.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git 4a5ac14ee968ff0ad5d2cc1ffa0299048db4c88a)
reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230812/202308121909.XNYBtqNI-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202308121909.XNYBtqNI-lkp@intel.com/

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   In file included from mm/memory.c:83:
   In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:78:
   include/asm-generic/io.h:547:31: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
     547 |         val = __raw_readb(PCI_IOBASE + addr);
         |                           ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:560:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
     560 |         val = __le16_to_cpu((__le16 __force)__raw_readw(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
         |                                                         ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:37:59: note: expanded from macro '__le16_to_cpu'
      37 | #define __le16_to_cpu(x) __swab16((__force __u16)(__le16)(x))
         |                                                           ^
   include/uapi/linux/swab.h:102:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab16'
     102 | #define __swab16(x) (__u16)__builtin_bswap16((__u16)(x))
         |                                                      ^
   In file included from mm/memory.c:83:
   In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:78:
   include/asm-generic/io.h:573:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
     573 |         val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
         |                                                         ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:35:59: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu'
      35 | #define __le32_to_cpu(x) __swab32((__force __u32)(__le32)(x))
         |                                                           ^
   include/uapi/linux/swab.h:115:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab32'
     115 | #define __swab32(x) (__u32)__builtin_bswap32((__u32)(x))
         |                                                      ^
   In file included from mm/memory.c:83:
   In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:78:
   include/asm-generic/io.h:584:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
     584 |         __raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr);
         |                             ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:594:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
     594 |         __raw_writew((u16 __force)cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
         |                                                       ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:604:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
     604 |         __raw_writel((u32 __force)cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
         |                                                       ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:692:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
     692 |         readsb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
         |                ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:700:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
     700 |         readsw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
         |                ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:708:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
     708 |         readsl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
         |                ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:717:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
     717 |         writesb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
         |                 ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:726:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
     726 |         writesw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
         |                 ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:735:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
     735 |         writesl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
         |                 ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>> mm/memory.c:5410:34: error: call to undeclared function 'vma_is_tcp'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
    5410 |         if (unlikely(!vma->anon_vma && !vma_is_tcp(vma)))
         |                                         ^
   mm/memory.c:5410:34: note: did you mean 'vma_is_dax'?
   include/linux/fs.h:2990:20: note: 'vma_is_dax' declared here
    2990 | static inline bool vma_is_dax(const struct vm_area_struct *vma)
         |                    ^
   12 warnings and 1 error generated.


vim +/vma_is_tcp +5410 mm/memory.c

c2508ec5a58db6 Linus Torvalds     2023-06-15  5382  
50ee3253720614 Suren Baghdasaryan 2023-02-27  5383  #ifdef CONFIG_PER_VMA_LOCK
50ee3253720614 Suren Baghdasaryan 2023-02-27  5384  /*
50ee3253720614 Suren Baghdasaryan 2023-02-27  5385   * Lookup and lock a VMA under RCU protection. Returned VMA is guaranteed to be
50ee3253720614 Suren Baghdasaryan 2023-02-27  5386   * stable and not isolated. If the VMA is not found or is being modified the
50ee3253720614 Suren Baghdasaryan 2023-02-27  5387   * function returns NULL.
50ee3253720614 Suren Baghdasaryan 2023-02-27  5388   */
50ee3253720614 Suren Baghdasaryan 2023-02-27  5389  struct vm_area_struct *lock_vma_under_rcu(struct mm_struct *mm,
50ee3253720614 Suren Baghdasaryan 2023-02-27  5390  					  unsigned long address)
50ee3253720614 Suren Baghdasaryan 2023-02-27  5391  {
50ee3253720614 Suren Baghdasaryan 2023-02-27  5392  	MA_STATE(mas, &mm->mm_mt, address, address);
50ee3253720614 Suren Baghdasaryan 2023-02-27  5393  	struct vm_area_struct *vma;
50ee3253720614 Suren Baghdasaryan 2023-02-27  5394  
50ee3253720614 Suren Baghdasaryan 2023-02-27  5395  	rcu_read_lock();
50ee3253720614 Suren Baghdasaryan 2023-02-27  5396  retry:
50ee3253720614 Suren Baghdasaryan 2023-02-27  5397  	vma = mas_walk(&mas);
50ee3253720614 Suren Baghdasaryan 2023-02-27  5398  	if (!vma)
50ee3253720614 Suren Baghdasaryan 2023-02-27  5399  		goto inval;
50ee3253720614 Suren Baghdasaryan 2023-02-27  5400  
50ee3253720614 Suren Baghdasaryan 2023-02-27  5401  	if (!vma_start_read(vma))
50ee3253720614 Suren Baghdasaryan 2023-02-27  5402  		goto inval;
50ee3253720614 Suren Baghdasaryan 2023-02-27  5403  
657b5146955eba Jann Horn          2023-07-26  5404  	/*
657b5146955eba Jann Horn          2023-07-26  5405  	 * find_mergeable_anon_vma uses adjacent vmas which are not locked.
657b5146955eba Jann Horn          2023-07-26  5406  	 * This check must happen after vma_start_read(); otherwise, a
657b5146955eba Jann Horn          2023-07-26  5407  	 * concurrent mremap() with MREMAP_DONTUNMAP could dissociate the VMA
657b5146955eba Jann Horn          2023-07-26  5408  	 * from its anon_vma.
657b5146955eba Jann Horn          2023-07-26  5409  	 */
657b5146955eba Jann Horn          2023-07-26 @5410  	if (unlikely(!vma->anon_vma && !vma_is_tcp(vma)))
657b5146955eba Jann Horn          2023-07-26  5411  		goto inval_end_read;
657b5146955eba Jann Horn          2023-07-26  5412  
444eeb17437a0e Suren Baghdasaryan 2023-02-27  5413  	/*
444eeb17437a0e Suren Baghdasaryan 2023-02-27  5414  	 * Due to the possibility of userfault handler dropping mmap_lock, avoid
444eeb17437a0e Suren Baghdasaryan 2023-02-27  5415  	 * it for now and fall back to page fault handling under mmap_lock.
444eeb17437a0e Suren Baghdasaryan 2023-02-27  5416  	 */
657b5146955eba Jann Horn          2023-07-26  5417  	if (userfaultfd_armed(vma))
657b5146955eba Jann Horn          2023-07-26  5418  		goto inval_end_read;
444eeb17437a0e Suren Baghdasaryan 2023-02-27  5419  
50ee3253720614 Suren Baghdasaryan 2023-02-27  5420  	/* Check since vm_start/vm_end might change before we lock the VMA */
657b5146955eba Jann Horn          2023-07-26  5421  	if (unlikely(address < vma->vm_start || address >= vma->vm_end))
657b5146955eba Jann Horn          2023-07-26  5422  		goto inval_end_read;
50ee3253720614 Suren Baghdasaryan 2023-02-27  5423  
50ee3253720614 Suren Baghdasaryan 2023-02-27  5424  	/* Check if the VMA got isolated after we found it */
50ee3253720614 Suren Baghdasaryan 2023-02-27  5425  	if (vma->detached) {
50ee3253720614 Suren Baghdasaryan 2023-02-27  5426  		vma_end_read(vma);
52f238653e452e Suren Baghdasaryan 2023-02-27  5427  		count_vm_vma_lock_event(VMA_LOCK_MISS);
50ee3253720614 Suren Baghdasaryan 2023-02-27  5428  		/* The area was replaced with another one */
50ee3253720614 Suren Baghdasaryan 2023-02-27  5429  		goto retry;
50ee3253720614 Suren Baghdasaryan 2023-02-27  5430  	}
50ee3253720614 Suren Baghdasaryan 2023-02-27  5431  
50ee3253720614 Suren Baghdasaryan 2023-02-27  5432  	rcu_read_unlock();
50ee3253720614 Suren Baghdasaryan 2023-02-27  5433  	return vma;
657b5146955eba Jann Horn          2023-07-26  5434  
657b5146955eba Jann Horn          2023-07-26  5435  inval_end_read:
657b5146955eba Jann Horn          2023-07-26  5436  	vma_end_read(vma);
50ee3253720614 Suren Baghdasaryan 2023-02-27  5437  inval:
50ee3253720614 Suren Baghdasaryan 2023-02-27  5438  	rcu_read_unlock();
52f238653e452e Suren Baghdasaryan 2023-02-27  5439  	count_vm_vma_lock_event(VMA_LOCK_ABORT);
50ee3253720614 Suren Baghdasaryan 2023-02-27  5440  	return NULL;
50ee3253720614 Suren Baghdasaryan 2023-02-27  5441  }
50ee3253720614 Suren Baghdasaryan 2023-02-27  5442  #endif /* CONFIG_PER_VMA_LOCK */
50ee3253720614 Suren Baghdasaryan 2023-02-27  5443  

:::::: The code at line 5410 was first introduced by commit
:::::: 657b5146955eba331e01b9a6ae89ce2e716ba306 mm: lock_vma_under_rcu() must check vma->anon_vma under vma lock

:::::: TO: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
:::::: CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [akpm-mm:mm-stable 219/240] mm/memory.c:5410:34: error: call to undeclared function 'vma_is_tcp'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations
  2023-08-12 11:40 [akpm-mm:mm-stable 219/240] mm/memory.c:5410:34: error: call to undeclared function 'vma_is_tcp'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations kernel test robot
@ 2023-08-12 15:56 ` Matthew Wilcox
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Wilcox @ 2023-08-12 15:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kernel test robot
  Cc: llvm, oe-kbuild-all, Andrew Morton, Linux Memory Management List,
	Suren Baghdasaryan

On Sat, Aug 12, 2023 at 07:40:10PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> >> mm/memory.c:5410:34: error: call to undeclared function 'vma_is_tcp'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
>     5410 |         if (unlikely(!vma->anon_vma && !vma_is_tcp(vma)))
>          |                                         ^

This is a mismerge.  This patch will fix.

diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index f06266464208..004b2e5dfef3 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -5456,7 +5456,7 @@ struct vm_area_struct *lock_vma_under_rcu(struct mm_struct *mm,
 	 * concurrent mremap() with MREMAP_DONTUNMAP could dissociate the VMA
 	 * from its anon_vma.
 	 */
-	if (unlikely(!vma->anon_vma && !vma_is_tcp(vma)))
+	if (vma_is_anonymous(vma) && !vma->anon_vma)
 		goto inval_end_read;
 
 	/*

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-08-12 15:56 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-08-12 11:40 [akpm-mm:mm-stable 219/240] mm/memory.c:5410:34: error: call to undeclared function 'vma_is_tcp'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations kernel test robot
2023-08-12 15:56 ` Matthew Wilcox

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).