Re: [RFC ipsec-next 5/8] iptfs: netlink: add config (netlink) options

[kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>]

Hi Christian,

[This is a private test report for your RFC patch.]
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:

[auto build test ERROR on klassert-ipsec-next/master]
[also build test ERROR on klassert-ipsec/master netfilter-nf/main linus/master v6.6 next-20231110]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Christian-Hopps/iptfs-uapi-ip-add-ip_tfs_-_hdr-packet-formats/20231110-203822
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/klassert/ipsec-next.git master
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231110113719.3055788-6-chopps%40chopps.org
patch subject: [RFC ipsec-next 5/8] iptfs: netlink: add config (netlink) options
config: x86_64-buildonly-randconfig-004-20231110 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231111/202311110118.MvEGQstw-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-12 (Debian 12.2.0-14) 12.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231111/202311110118.MvEGQstw-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202311110118.MvEGQstw-lkp@intel.com/

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   In file included from <command-line>:
   In function 'xfrm_xlate32_attr',
       inlined from 'xfrm_xlate32' at net/xfrm/xfrm_compat.c:575:9:
>> include/linux/compiler_types.h:425:45: error: call to '__compiletime_assert_709' declared with attribute error: BUILD_BUG_ON failed: XFRMA_MAX != XFRMA_MTIMER_THRESH
     425 |         _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
         |                                             ^
   include/linux/compiler_types.h:406:25: note: in definition of macro '__compiletime_assert'
     406 |                         prefix ## suffix();                             \
         |                         ^~~~~~
   include/linux/compiler_types.h:425:9: note: in expansion of macro '_compiletime_assert'
     425 |         _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
         |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   include/linux/build_bug.h:39:37: note: in expansion of macro 'compiletime_assert'
      39 | #define BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(cond, msg) compiletime_assert(!(cond), msg)
         |                                     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   include/linux/build_bug.h:50:9: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG'
      50 |         BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(condition, "BUILD_BUG_ON failed: " #condition)
         |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   net/xfrm/xfrm_compat.c:437:17: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON'
     437 |                 BUILD_BUG_ON(XFRMA_MAX != XFRMA_MTIMER_THRESH);
         |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~
   net/xfrm/xfrm_compat.c: In function 'xfrm_xlate64_attr':
   include/linux/compiler_types.h:425:45: error: call to '__compiletime_assert_708' declared with attribute error: BUILD_BUG_ON failed: XFRMA_MAX != XFRMA_MTIMER_THRESH
     425 |         _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
         |                                             ^
   include/linux/compiler_types.h:406:25: note: in definition of macro '__compiletime_assert'
     406 |                         prefix ## suffix();                             \
         |                         ^~~~~~
   include/linux/compiler_types.h:425:9: note: in expansion of macro '_compiletime_assert'
     425 |         _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
         |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   include/linux/build_bug.h:39:37: note: in expansion of macro 'compiletime_assert'
      39 | #define BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(cond, msg) compiletime_assert(!(cond), msg)
         |                                     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   include/linux/build_bug.h:50:9: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG'
      50 |         BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(condition, "BUILD_BUG_ON failed: " #condition)
         |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   net/xfrm/xfrm_compat.c:282:17: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON'
     282 |                 BUILD_BUG_ON(XFRMA_MAX != XFRMA_MTIMER_THRESH);
         |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~


vim +/__compiletime_assert_709 +425 include/linux/compiler_types.h

eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21  411  
eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21  412  #define _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, prefix, suffix) \
eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21  413  	__compiletime_assert(condition, msg, prefix, suffix)
eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21  414  
eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21  415  /**
eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21  416   * compiletime_assert - break build and emit msg if condition is false
eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21  417   * @condition: a compile-time constant condition to check
eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21  418   * @msg:       a message to emit if condition is false
eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21  419   *
eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21  420   * In tradition of POSIX assert, this macro will break the build if the
eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21  421   * supplied condition is *false*, emitting the supplied error message if the
eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21  422   * compiler has support to do so.
eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21  423   */
eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21  424  #define compiletime_assert(condition, msg) \
eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21 @425  	_compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
eb5c2d4b45e3d2 Will Deacon 2020-07-21  426  

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki