oe-kbuild-all.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>,
	Andrew Worsley <amworsley@gmail.com>
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:DRM DRIVER FOR FIRMWARE FRAMEBUFFERS"
	<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of/platform: Disable sysfb if a simple-framebuffer node is
Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2023 22:41:28 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202311122208.2emZJrfT-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87a5rj9s37.fsf@minerva.mail-host-address-is-not-set>

Hi Javier,

kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:

[auto build test ERROR on robh/for-next]
[also build test ERROR on drm-misc/drm-misc-next drm-tip/drm-tip linus/master v6.6 next-20231110]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Javier-Martinez-Canillas/of-platform-Disable-sysfb-if-a-simple-framebuffer-node-is/20231112-183751
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/robh/linux.git for-next
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/87a5rj9s37.fsf%40minerva.mail-host-address-is-not-set
patch subject: [PATCH] of/platform: Disable sysfb if a simple-framebuffer node is
config: arm-versatile_defconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231112/202311122208.2emZJrfT-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 17.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git 4a5ac14ee968ff0ad5d2cc1ffa0299048db4c88a)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231112/202311122208.2emZJrfT-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202311122208.2emZJrfT-lkp@intel.com/

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

>> drivers/of/platform.c:635:4: error: call to undeclared function 'sysfb_disable'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
     635 |                         sysfb_disable();
         |                         ^
   1 error generated.


vim +/sysfb_disable +635 drivers/of/platform.c

   545	
   546	static int __init of_platform_default_populate_init(void)
   547	{
   548		struct device_node *node;
   549	
   550		device_links_supplier_sync_state_pause();
   551	
   552		if (!of_have_populated_dt())
   553			return -ENODEV;
   554	
   555		if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PPC)) {
   556			struct device_node *boot_display = NULL;
   557			struct platform_device *dev;
   558			int display_number = 0;
   559			int ret;
   560	
   561			/* Check if we have a MacOS display without a node spec */
   562			if (of_property_present(of_chosen, "linux,bootx-noscreen")) {
   563				/*
   564				 * The old code tried to work out which node was the MacOS
   565				 * display based on the address. I'm dropping that since the
   566				 * lack of a node spec only happens with old BootX versions
   567				 * (users can update) and with this code, they'll still get
   568				 * a display (just not the palette hacks).
   569				 */
   570				dev = platform_device_alloc("bootx-noscreen", 0);
   571				if (WARN_ON(!dev))
   572					return -ENOMEM;
   573				ret = platform_device_add(dev);
   574				if (WARN_ON(ret)) {
   575					platform_device_put(dev);
   576					return ret;
   577				}
   578			}
   579	
   580			/*
   581			 * For OF framebuffers, first create the device for the boot display,
   582			 * then for the other framebuffers. Only fail for the boot display;
   583			 * ignore errors for the rest.
   584			 */
   585			for_each_node_by_type(node, "display") {
   586				if (!of_get_property(node, "linux,opened", NULL) ||
   587				    !of_get_property(node, "linux,boot-display", NULL))
   588					continue;
   589				dev = of_platform_device_create(node, "of-display", NULL);
   590				of_node_put(node);
   591				if (WARN_ON(!dev))
   592					return -ENOMEM;
   593				boot_display = node;
   594				display_number++;
   595				break;
   596			}
   597			for_each_node_by_type(node, "display") {
   598				char buf[14];
   599				const char *of_display_format = "of-display.%d";
   600	
   601				if (!of_get_property(node, "linux,opened", NULL) || node == boot_display)
   602					continue;
   603				ret = snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf), of_display_format, display_number++);
   604				if (ret < sizeof(buf))
   605					of_platform_device_create(node, buf, NULL);
   606			}
   607	
   608		} else {
   609			/*
   610			 * Handle certain compatibles explicitly, since we don't want to create
   611			 * platform_devices for every node in /reserved-memory with a
   612			 * "compatible",
   613			 */
   614			for_each_matching_node(node, reserved_mem_matches)
   615				of_platform_device_create(node, NULL, NULL);
   616	
   617			node = of_find_node_by_path("/firmware");
   618			if (node) {
   619				of_platform_populate(node, NULL, NULL, NULL);
   620				of_node_put(node);
   621			}
   622	
   623			node = of_get_compatible_child(of_chosen, "simple-framebuffer");
   624			if (node) {
   625				/*
   626				 * Since a "simple-framebuffer" device is already added
   627				 * here, disable the Generic System Framebuffers (sysfb)
   628				 * to prevent it from registering another device for the
   629				 * system framebuffer later (e.g: using the screen_info
   630				 * data that may had been filled as well).
   631				 *
   632				 * This can happen for example on DT systems that do EFI
   633				 * booting and may provide a GOP table to the EFI stub.
   634				 */
 > 635				sysfb_disable();
   636				of_platform_device_create(node, NULL, NULL);
   637				of_node_put(node);
   638			}
   639	
   640			/* Populate everything else. */
   641			of_platform_default_populate(NULL, NULL, NULL);
   642		}
   643	
   644		return 0;
   645	}
   646	arch_initcall_sync(of_platform_default_populate_init);
   647	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

      parent reply	other threads:[~2023-11-12 14:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <87a5rj9s37.fsf@minerva.mail-host-address-is-not-set>
2023-11-12 13:27 ` [PATCH] of/platform: Disable sysfb if a simple-framebuffer node is kernel test robot
2023-11-12 14:41 ` kernel test robot [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202311122208.2emZJrfT-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=amworsley@gmail.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=javierm@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=mripard@kernel.org \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).