Re: [PATCH] extcon: usbc-tusb320: Set interrupt polarity based on device-tree

* Re: [PATCH] extcon: usbc-tusb320: Set interrupt polarity based on device-tree
       [not found] <20231121124844.872238-1-lukas.funke-oss@weidmueller.com>
@ 2023-11-22  0:54 ` kernel test robot
  2023-11-22  7:19 ` kernel test robot
  2023-11-23  1:54 ` [PATCH] " kernel test robot
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2023-11-22  0:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lukas Funke, MyungJoo Ham, Chanwoo Choi
  Cc: oe-kbuild-all, Lukas Funke, linux-kernel

Hi Lukas,

kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:

[auto build test WARNING on chanwoo-extcon/extcon-next]
[also build test WARNING on linus/master v6.7-rc2 next-20231121]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Lukas-Funke/extcon-usbc-tusb320-Set-interrupt-polarity-based-on-device-tree/20231121-205141
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chanwoo/extcon.git extcon-next
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231121124844.872238-1-lukas.funke-oss%40weidmueller.com
patch subject: [PATCH] extcon: usbc-tusb320: Set interrupt polarity based on device-tree
config: s390-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231122/202311220830.h2qNf15s-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: s390-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231122/202311220830.h2qNf15s-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202311220830.h2qNf15s-lkp@intel.com/

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

   drivers/extcon/extcon-usbc-tusb320.c: In function 'tusb320_probe':
   drivers/extcon/extcon-usbc-tusb320.c:573:17: error: implicit declaration of function 'irq_get_irq_data'; did you mean 'irq_set_irq_wake'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
     573 |         irq_d = irq_get_irq_data(client->irq);
         |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
         |                 irq_set_irq_wake
>> drivers/extcon/extcon-usbc-tusb320.c:573:15: warning: assignment to 'struct irq_data *' from 'int' makes pointer from integer without a cast [-Wint-conversion]
     573 |         irq_d = irq_get_irq_data(client->irq);
         |               ^
   drivers/extcon/extcon-usbc-tusb320.c:579:19: error: implicit declaration of function 'irqd_get_trigger_type' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
     579 |         irq_pol = irqd_get_trigger_type(irq_d);
         |                   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   cc1: some warnings being treated as errors

vim +573 drivers/extcon/extcon-usbc-tusb320.c

   511	
   512	static int tusb320_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
   513	{
   514		struct tusb320_priv *priv;
   515		const void *match_data;
   516		unsigned int revision;
   517		int ret;
   518		int irq_pol;
   519		struct irq_data *irq_d;
   520	
   521		priv = devm_kzalloc(&client->dev, sizeof(*priv), GFP_KERNEL);
   522		if (!priv)
   523			return -ENOMEM;
   524	
   525		priv->dev = &client->dev;
   526		i2c_set_clientdata(client, priv);
   527	
   528		priv->regmap = devm_regmap_init_i2c(client, &tusb320_regmap_config);
   529		if (IS_ERR(priv->regmap))
   530			return PTR_ERR(priv->regmap);
   531	
   532		ret = tusb320_check_signature(priv);
   533		if (ret)
   534			return ret;
   535	
   536		match_data = device_get_match_data(&client->dev);
   537		if (!match_data)
   538			return -EINVAL;
   539	
   540		priv->ops = (struct tusb320_ops*)match_data;
   541	
   542		if (priv->ops->get_revision) {
   543			ret = priv->ops->get_revision(priv, &revision);
   544			if (ret)
   545				dev_warn(priv->dev,
   546					"failed to read revision register: %d\n", ret);
   547			else
   548				dev_info(priv->dev, "chip revision %d\n", revision);
   549		}
   550	
   551		ret = tusb320_extcon_probe(priv);
   552		if (ret)
   553			return ret;
   554	
   555		ret = tusb320_typec_probe(client, priv);
   556		if (ret)
   557			return ret;
   558	
   559		/* update initial state */
   560		tusb320_state_update_handler(priv, true);
   561	
   562		/* Reset chip to its default state */
   563		ret = tusb320_reset(priv);
   564		if (ret)
   565			dev_warn(priv->dev, "failed to reset chip: %d\n", ret);
   566		else
   567			/*
   568			 * State and polarity might change after a reset, so update
   569			 * them again and make sure the interrupt status bit is cleared.
   570			 */
   571			tusb320_state_update_handler(priv, true);
   572	
 > 573		irq_d = irq_get_irq_data(client->irq);
   574		if (!irq_d) {
   575			dev_err(&client->dev, "Invalid IRQ: %d\n", client->irq);
   576			return -ENODEV;
   577		}
   578	
   579		irq_pol = irqd_get_trigger_type(irq_d);
   580	
   581		ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(priv->dev, client->irq, NULL,
   582						tusb320_irq_handler,
   583						IRQF_ONESHOT | irq_pol,
   584						client->name, priv);
   585		if (ret)
   586			tusb320_typec_remove(priv);
   587	
   588		return ret;
   589	}
   590	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread