oe-kbuild-all.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 12/19] x86: Implement the Memory Table feature to store arbitrary per-page data
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2023 15:19:27 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202311221345.9sPNLiAU-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231113022326.24388-13-mic@digikod.net>

Hi Mickaël,

[This is a private test report for your RFC patch.]
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:

[auto build test WARNING on 881375a408c0f4ea451ff14545b59216d2923881]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Micka-l-Sala-n/virt-Introduce-Hypervisor-Enforced-Kernel-Integrity-Heki/20231113-102847
base:   881375a408c0f4ea451ff14545b59216d2923881
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231113022326.24388-13-mic%40digikod.net
patch subject: [RFC PATCH v2 12/19] x86: Implement the Memory Table feature to store arbitrary per-page data
config: x86_64-randconfig-123-20231122 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231122/202311221345.9sPNLiAU-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-11 (Debian 11.3.0-12) 11.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231122/202311221345.9sPNLiAU-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202311221345.9sPNLiAU-lkp@intel.com/

sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>> kernel/mem_table.c:47:14: sparse: sparse: symbol 'mem_table_base_level' was not declared. Should it be static?
>> kernel/mem_table.c:48:14: sparse: sparse: symbol 'mem_table_nlevels' was not declared. Should it be static?
>> kernel/mem_table.c:49:24: sparse: sparse: symbol 'mem_table_levels' was not declared. Should it be static?

vim +/mem_table_base_level +47 kernel/mem_table.c

    42	
    43	/*
    44	 * Within this feature, the table levels start from 0. On X86, the base level
    45	 * is not 0.
    46	 */
  > 47	unsigned int mem_table_base_level __ro_after_init;
  > 48	unsigned int mem_table_nlevels __ro_after_init;
  > 49	struct mem_table_level mem_table_levels[CONFIG_PGTABLE_LEVELS] __ro_after_init;
    50	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

           reply	other threads:[~2023-11-22  7:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed
 [parent not found: <20231113022326.24388-13-mic@digikod.net>]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202311221345.9sPNLiAU-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=mic@digikod.net \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).