oe-kbuild-all.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Subject: drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c:437:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces)
Date: Sun, 3 Dec 2023 15:32:46 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202312031555.EyyW2riN-lkp@intel.com> (raw)

tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
head:   968f35f4ab1c0966ceb39af3c89f2e24afedf878
commit: 281d0c962752fb40866dd8d4cade68656f34bd1f fortify: Add Clang support
date:   1 year, 10 months ago
config: arm64-randconfig-r131-20231130 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231203/202312031555.EyyW2riN-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 17.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git 4a5ac14ee968ff0ad5d2cc1ffa0299048db4c88a)
reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231203/202312031555.EyyW2riN-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202312031555.EyyW2riN-lkp@intel.com/

sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>)
>> drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c:437:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@     expected void const * @@     got void [noderef] __iomem *cpu_addr @@
   drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c:437:9: sparse:     expected void const *
   drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c:437:9: sparse:     got void [noderef] __iomem *cpu_addr
>> drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c:437:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@     expected void const * @@     got void [noderef] __iomem *cpu_addr @@
   drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c:437:9: sparse:     expected void const *
   drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c:437:9: sparse:     got void [noderef] __iomem *cpu_addr
   drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c:437:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@     expected void * @@     got void [noderef] __iomem *cpu_addr @@
   drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c:437:9: sparse:     expected void *
   drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c:437:9: sparse:     got void [noderef] __iomem *cpu_addr
   drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c:440:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@     expected void const * @@     got void [noderef] __iomem *cpu_addr @@
   drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c:440:9: sparse:     expected void const *
   drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c:440:9: sparse:     got void [noderef] __iomem *cpu_addr
   drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c:440:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@     expected void const * @@     got void [noderef] __iomem *cpu_addr @@
   drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c:440:9: sparse:     expected void const *
   drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c:440:9: sparse:     got void [noderef] __iomem *cpu_addr
   drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c:440:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) @@     expected void * @@     got void [noderef] __iomem *cpu_addr @@
   drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c:440:9: sparse:     expected void *
   drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c:440:9: sparse:     got void [noderef] __iomem *cpu_addr

vim +437 drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c

6dedbd1d544389 Suman Anna 2020-10-02  378  
6dedbd1d544389 Suman Anna 2020-10-02  379  /*
6dedbd1d544389 Suman Anna 2020-10-02  380   * The R5F cores have controls for both a reset and a halt/run. The code
6dedbd1d544389 Suman Anna 2020-10-02  381   * execution from DDR requires the initial boot-strapping code to be run
6dedbd1d544389 Suman Anna 2020-10-02  382   * from the internal TCMs. This function is used to release the resets on
6dedbd1d544389 Suman Anna 2020-10-02  383   * applicable cores to allow loading into the TCMs. The .prepare() ops is
6dedbd1d544389 Suman Anna 2020-10-02  384   * invoked by remoteproc core before any firmware loading, and is followed
6dedbd1d544389 Suman Anna 2020-10-02  385   * by the .start() ops after loading to actually let the R5 cores run.
ee99ee7c929c3e Suman Anna 2021-03-27  386   *
ee99ee7c929c3e Suman Anna 2021-03-27  387   * The Single-CPU mode on applicable SoCs (eg: AM64x) only uses Core0 to
ee99ee7c929c3e Suman Anna 2021-03-27  388   * execute code, but combines the TCMs from both cores. The resets for both
ee99ee7c929c3e Suman Anna 2021-03-27  389   * cores need to be released to make this possible, as the TCMs are in general
ee99ee7c929c3e Suman Anna 2021-03-27  390   * private to each core. Only Core0 needs to be unhalted for running the
ee99ee7c929c3e Suman Anna 2021-03-27  391   * cluster in this mode. The function uses the same reset logic as LockStep
ee99ee7c929c3e Suman Anna 2021-03-27  392   * mode for this (though the behavior is agnostic of the reset release order).
6dedbd1d544389 Suman Anna 2020-10-02  393   */
6dedbd1d544389 Suman Anna 2020-10-02  394  static int k3_r5_rproc_prepare(struct rproc *rproc)
6dedbd1d544389 Suman Anna 2020-10-02  395  {
6dedbd1d544389 Suman Anna 2020-10-02  396  	struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv;
6dedbd1d544389 Suman Anna 2020-10-02  397  	struct k3_r5_cluster *cluster = kproc->cluster;
6dedbd1d544389 Suman Anna 2020-10-02  398  	struct k3_r5_core *core = kproc->core;
6dedbd1d544389 Suman Anna 2020-10-02  399  	struct device *dev = kproc->dev;
7508ea19b20da8 Suman Anna 2020-11-18  400  	u32 ctrl = 0, cfg = 0, stat = 0;
7508ea19b20da8 Suman Anna 2020-11-18  401  	u64 boot_vec = 0;
7508ea19b20da8 Suman Anna 2020-11-18  402  	bool mem_init_dis;
6dedbd1d544389 Suman Anna 2020-10-02  403  	int ret;
6dedbd1d544389 Suman Anna 2020-10-02  404  
7508ea19b20da8 Suman Anna 2020-11-18  405  	ret = ti_sci_proc_get_status(core->tsp, &boot_vec, &cfg, &ctrl, &stat);
7508ea19b20da8 Suman Anna 2020-11-18  406  	if (ret < 0)
7508ea19b20da8 Suman Anna 2020-11-18  407  		return ret;
7508ea19b20da8 Suman Anna 2020-11-18  408  	mem_init_dis = !!(cfg & PROC_BOOT_CFG_FLAG_R5_MEM_INIT_DIS);
7508ea19b20da8 Suman Anna 2020-11-18  409  
ee99ee7c929c3e Suman Anna 2021-03-27  410  	/* Re-use LockStep-mode reset logic for Single-CPU mode */
ee99ee7c929c3e Suman Anna 2021-03-27  411  	ret = (cluster->mode == CLUSTER_MODE_LOCKSTEP ||
ee99ee7c929c3e Suman Anna 2021-03-27  412  	       cluster->mode == CLUSTER_MODE_SINGLECPU) ?
6dedbd1d544389 Suman Anna 2020-10-02  413  		k3_r5_lockstep_release(cluster) : k3_r5_split_release(core);
34f2653686fecc Suman Anna 2020-10-02  414  	if (ret) {
6dedbd1d544389 Suman Anna 2020-10-02  415  		dev_err(dev, "unable to enable cores for TCM loading, ret = %d\n",
6dedbd1d544389 Suman Anna 2020-10-02  416  			ret);
6dedbd1d544389 Suman Anna 2020-10-02  417  		return ret;
6dedbd1d544389 Suman Anna 2020-10-02  418  	}
6dedbd1d544389 Suman Anna 2020-10-02  419  
7508ea19b20da8 Suman Anna 2020-11-18  420  	/*
7508ea19b20da8 Suman Anna 2020-11-18  421  	 * Newer IP revisions like on J7200 SoCs support h/w auto-initialization
7508ea19b20da8 Suman Anna 2020-11-18  422  	 * of TCMs, so there is no need to perform the s/w memzero. This bit is
7508ea19b20da8 Suman Anna 2020-11-18  423  	 * configurable through System Firmware, the default value does perform
7508ea19b20da8 Suman Anna 2020-11-18  424  	 * auto-init, but account for it in case it is disabled
7508ea19b20da8 Suman Anna 2020-11-18  425  	 */
7508ea19b20da8 Suman Anna 2020-11-18  426  	if (cluster->soc_data->tcm_ecc_autoinit && !mem_init_dis) {
7508ea19b20da8 Suman Anna 2020-11-18  427  		dev_dbg(dev, "leveraging h/w init for TCM memories\n");
7508ea19b20da8 Suman Anna 2020-11-18  428  		return 0;
7508ea19b20da8 Suman Anna 2020-11-18  429  	}
7508ea19b20da8 Suman Anna 2020-11-18  430  
34f2653686fecc Suman Anna 2020-10-02  431  	/*
34f2653686fecc Suman Anna 2020-10-02  432  	 * Zero out both TCMs unconditionally (access from v8 Arm core is not
34f2653686fecc Suman Anna 2020-10-02  433  	 * affected by ATCM & BTCM enable configuration values) so that ECC
34f2653686fecc Suman Anna 2020-10-02  434  	 * can be effective on all TCM addresses.
34f2653686fecc Suman Anna 2020-10-02  435  	 */
34f2653686fecc Suman Anna 2020-10-02  436  	dev_dbg(dev, "zeroing out ATCM memory\n");
34f2653686fecc Suman Anna 2020-10-02 @437  	memset(core->mem[0].cpu_addr, 0x00, core->mem[0].size);
34f2653686fecc Suman Anna 2020-10-02  438  
34f2653686fecc Suman Anna 2020-10-02  439  	dev_dbg(dev, "zeroing out BTCM memory\n");
34f2653686fecc Suman Anna 2020-10-02  440  	memset(core->mem[1].cpu_addr, 0x00, core->mem[1].size);
34f2653686fecc Suman Anna 2020-10-02  441  
34f2653686fecc Suman Anna 2020-10-02  442  	return 0;
34f2653686fecc Suman Anna 2020-10-02  443  }
34f2653686fecc Suman Anna 2020-10-02  444  

:::::: The code at line 437 was first introduced by commit
:::::: 34f2653686fecc9bd5a4ee16724768c72953fb57 remoteproc: k3-r5: Initialize TCM memories for ECC

:::::: TO: Suman Anna <s-anna@ti.com>
:::::: CC: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

             reply	other threads:[~2023-12-03  7:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-03  7:32 kernel test robot [this message]
2023-12-03 10:56 ` drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c:437:9: sparse: sparse: incorrect type in argument 1 (different address spaces) Philip Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202312031555.EyyW2riN-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).