From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Menglong Dong <dongmenglong.8@bytedance.com>, andrii@kernel.org
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@linux.dev,
eddyz87@gmail.com, song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev,
john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@google.com,
haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org, agordeev@linux.ibm.com,
borntraeger@linux.ibm.com, svens@linux.ibm.com,
davem@davemloft.net, dsahern@kernel.org,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com, quentin@isovalent.com,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 6/9] bpf: tracing: add multi-link support
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2024 02:59:11 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202403120218.Me518kSk-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240311093526.1010158-7-dongmenglong.8@bytedance.com>
Hi Menglong,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on bpf-next/master]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Menglong-Dong/bpf-tracing-add-support-to-record-and-check-the-accessed-args/20240311-173954
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git master
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240311093526.1010158-7-dongmenglong.8%40bytedance.com
patch subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 6/9] bpf: tracing: add multi-link support
config: hexagon-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240312/202403120218.Me518kSk-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 19.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 503c55e17037436dcd45ac69dea8967e67e3f5e8)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240312/202403120218.Me518kSk-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202403120218.Me518kSk-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4:
In file included from include/linux/bpf.h:31:
In file included from include/linux/memcontrol.h:13:
In file included from include/linux/cgroup.h:26:
In file included from include/linux/kernel_stat.h:9:
In file included from include/linux/interrupt.h:11:
In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:11:
In file included from ./arch/hexagon/include/generated/asm/hardirq.h:1:
In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17:
In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
In file included from arch/hexagon/include/asm/io.h:328:
include/asm-generic/io.h:573:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
573 | val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/uapi/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:35:51: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu'
35 | #define __le32_to_cpu(x) ((__force __u32)(__le32)(x))
| ^
In file included from kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4:
In file included from include/linux/bpf.h:31:
In file included from include/linux/memcontrol.h:13:
In file included from include/linux/cgroup.h:26:
In file included from include/linux/kernel_stat.h:9:
In file included from include/linux/interrupt.h:11:
In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:11:
In file included from ./arch/hexagon/include/generated/asm/hardirq.h:1:
In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17:
In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
In file included from arch/hexagon/include/asm/io.h:328:
include/asm-generic/io.h:584:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
584 | __raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:594:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
594 | __raw_writew((u16 __force)cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:604:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
604 | __raw_writel((u32 __force)cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
In file included from kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4:
include/linux/bpf.h:751:48: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum bpf_type_flag' and 'enum bpf_arg_type') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
751 | ARG_PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL = PTR_MAYBE_NULL | ARG_PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE,
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/bpf.h:752:43: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum bpf_type_flag' and 'enum bpf_arg_type') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
752 | ARG_PTR_TO_MEM_OR_NULL = PTR_MAYBE_NULL | ARG_PTR_TO_MEM,
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/bpf.h:753:43: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum bpf_type_flag' and 'enum bpf_arg_type') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
753 | ARG_PTR_TO_CTX_OR_NULL = PTR_MAYBE_NULL | ARG_PTR_TO_CTX,
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/bpf.h:754:45: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum bpf_type_flag' and 'enum bpf_arg_type') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
754 | ARG_PTR_TO_SOCKET_OR_NULL = PTR_MAYBE_NULL | ARG_PTR_TO_SOCKET,
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/bpf.h:755:44: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum bpf_type_flag' and 'enum bpf_arg_type') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
755 | ARG_PTR_TO_STACK_OR_NULL = PTR_MAYBE_NULL | ARG_PTR_TO_STACK,
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/bpf.h:756:45: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum bpf_type_flag' and 'enum bpf_arg_type') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
756 | ARG_PTR_TO_BTF_ID_OR_NULL = PTR_MAYBE_NULL | ARG_PTR_TO_BTF_ID,
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/bpf.h:760:38: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum bpf_type_flag' and 'enum bpf_arg_type') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
760 | ARG_PTR_TO_UNINIT_MEM = MEM_UNINIT | ARG_PTR_TO_MEM,
| ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/bpf.h:762:45: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum bpf_type_flag' and 'enum bpf_arg_type') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
762 | ARG_PTR_TO_FIXED_SIZE_MEM = MEM_FIXED_SIZE | ARG_PTR_TO_MEM,
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/bpf.h:785:48: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum bpf_type_flag' and 'enum bpf_return_type') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
785 | RET_PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL = PTR_MAYBE_NULL | RET_PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE,
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/bpf.h:786:45: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum bpf_type_flag' and 'enum bpf_return_type') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
786 | RET_PTR_TO_SOCKET_OR_NULL = PTR_MAYBE_NULL | RET_PTR_TO_SOCKET,
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/bpf.h:787:47: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum bpf_type_flag' and 'enum bpf_return_type') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
787 | RET_PTR_TO_TCP_SOCK_OR_NULL = PTR_MAYBE_NULL | RET_PTR_TO_TCP_SOCK,
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/bpf.h:788:50: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum bpf_type_flag' and 'enum bpf_return_type') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
788 | RET_PTR_TO_SOCK_COMMON_OR_NULL = PTR_MAYBE_NULL | RET_PTR_TO_SOCK_COMMON,
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/bpf.h:790:49: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum bpf_type_flag' and 'enum bpf_return_type') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
790 | RET_PTR_TO_DYNPTR_MEM_OR_NULL = PTR_MAYBE_NULL | RET_PTR_TO_MEM,
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/bpf.h:791:45: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum bpf_type_flag' and 'enum bpf_return_type') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
791 | RET_PTR_TO_BTF_ID_OR_NULL = PTR_MAYBE_NULL | RET_PTR_TO_BTF_ID,
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/bpf.h:792:43: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum bpf_type_flag' and 'enum bpf_return_type') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
792 | RET_PTR_TO_BTF_ID_TRUSTED = PTR_TRUSTED | RET_PTR_TO_BTF_ID,
| ~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/bpf.h:903:44: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum bpf_type_flag' and 'enum bpf_reg_type') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
903 | PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL = PTR_MAYBE_NULL | PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE,
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/bpf.h:904:42: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum bpf_type_flag' and 'enum bpf_reg_type') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
904 | PTR_TO_SOCKET_OR_NULL = PTR_MAYBE_NULL | PTR_TO_SOCKET,
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/bpf.h:905:46: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum bpf_type_flag' and 'enum bpf_reg_type') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
905 | PTR_TO_SOCK_COMMON_OR_NULL = PTR_MAYBE_NULL | PTR_TO_SOCK_COMMON,
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/bpf.h:906:44: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum bpf_type_flag' and 'enum bpf_reg_type') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
906 | PTR_TO_TCP_SOCK_OR_NULL = PTR_MAYBE_NULL | PTR_TO_TCP_SOCK,
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/bpf.h:907:42: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum bpf_type_flag' and 'enum bpf_reg_type') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
907 | PTR_TO_BTF_ID_OR_NULL = PTR_MAYBE_NULL | PTR_TO_BTF_ID,
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> kernel/bpf/syscall.c:3538:2: error: call to undeclared function 'bpf_trampoline_multi_unlink_prog'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
3538 | bpf_trampoline_multi_unlink_prog(&multi_link->link);
| ^
kernel/bpf/syscall.c:3538:2: note: did you mean 'bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog'?
include/linux/bpf.h:1368:19: note: 'bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog' declared here
1368 | static inline int bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog(struct bpf_tramp_link *link,
| ^
>> kernel/bpf/syscall.c:3815:8: error: call to undeclared function 'bpf_trampoline_multi_link_prog'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
3815 | err = bpf_trampoline_multi_link_prog(&link->link);
| ^
kernel/bpf/syscall.c:3815:8: note: did you mean 'bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog'?
include/linux/bpf.h:1368:19: note: 'bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog' declared here
1368 | static inline int bpf_trampoline_unlink_prog(struct bpf_tramp_link *link,
| ^
kernel/bpf/syscall.c:3821:3: error: call to undeclared function 'bpf_trampoline_multi_unlink_prog'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
3821 | bpf_trampoline_multi_unlink_prog(&link->link);
| ^
kernel/bpf/syscall.c:6204:30: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum bpf_arg_type' and 'enum bpf_type_flag') [-Wenum-enum-conversion]
6204 | .arg2_type = ARG_PTR_TO_MEM | MEM_RDONLY,
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~
28 warnings and 3 errors generated.
vim +/bpf_trampoline_multi_unlink_prog +3538 kernel/bpf/syscall.c
3532
3533 static void bpf_tracing_multi_link_release(struct bpf_link *link)
3534 {
3535 struct bpf_tracing_multi_link *multi_link =
3536 container_of(link, struct bpf_tracing_multi_link, link.link);
3537
> 3538 bpf_trampoline_multi_unlink_prog(&multi_link->link);
3539 __bpf_tracing_multi_link_release(multi_link);
3540 }
3541
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-11 19:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20240311093526.1010158-7-dongmenglong.8@bytedance.com>
2024-03-11 18:59 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2024-03-11 21:36 ` [PATCH bpf-next v2 6/9] bpf: tracing: add multi-link support kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202403120218.Me518kSk-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dongmenglong.8@bytedance.com \
--cc=dsahern@kernel.org \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-trace-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=quentin@isovalent.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).