From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
eric.dumazet@gmail.com, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 6/8] net: rps: change input_queue_tail_incr_save()
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2024 20:07:37 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202403291901.lqImStGD-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240328170309.2172584-7-edumazet@google.com>
Hi Eric,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on net-next/main]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Eric-Dumazet/net-move-kick_defer_list_purge-to-net-core-dev-h/20240329-011413
base: net-next/main
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240328170309.2172584-7-edumazet%40google.com
patch subject: [PATCH net-next 6/8] net: rps: change input_queue_tail_incr_save()
config: sh-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240329/202403291901.lqImStGD-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: sh4-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240329/202403291901.lqImStGD-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202403291901.lqImStGD-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
net/core/dev.c: In function 'enqueue_to_backlog':
>> net/core/dev.c:4819:24: error: implicit declaration of function 'rps_input_queue_tail_incr' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
4819 | tail = rps_input_queue_tail_incr(sd);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> net/core/dev.c:4823:17: error: implicit declaration of function 'rps_input_queue_tail_save' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
4823 | rps_input_queue_tail_save(qtail, tail);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
net/core/dev.c: In function 'flush_backlog':
>> net/core/dev.c:5901:25: error: implicit declaration of function 'rps_input_queue_head_incr' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
5901 | rps_input_queue_head_incr(sd);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
vim +/rps_input_queue_tail_incr +4819 net/core/dev.c
4781
4782 /*
4783 * enqueue_to_backlog is called to queue an skb to a per CPU backlog
4784 * queue (may be a remote CPU queue).
4785 */
4786 static int enqueue_to_backlog(struct sk_buff *skb, int cpu,
4787 unsigned int *qtail)
4788 {
4789 enum skb_drop_reason reason;
4790 struct softnet_data *sd;
4791 unsigned long flags;
4792 unsigned int qlen;
4793 int max_backlog;
4794 u32 tail;
4795
4796 reason = SKB_DROP_REASON_DEV_READY;
4797 if (!netif_running(skb->dev))
4798 goto bad_dev;
4799
4800 reason = SKB_DROP_REASON_CPU_BACKLOG;
4801 sd = &per_cpu(softnet_data, cpu);
4802
4803 qlen = skb_queue_len_lockless(&sd->input_pkt_queue);
4804 max_backlog = READ_ONCE(net_hotdata.max_backlog);
4805 if (unlikely(qlen > max_backlog))
4806 goto cpu_backlog_drop;
4807 backlog_lock_irq_save(sd, &flags);
4808 qlen = skb_queue_len(&sd->input_pkt_queue);
4809 if (qlen <= max_backlog && !skb_flow_limit(skb, qlen)) {
4810 if (!qlen) {
4811 /* Schedule NAPI for backlog device. We can use
4812 * non atomic operation as we own the queue lock.
4813 */
4814 if (!__test_and_set_bit(NAPI_STATE_SCHED,
4815 &sd->backlog.state))
4816 napi_schedule_rps(sd);
4817 }
4818 __skb_queue_tail(&sd->input_pkt_queue, skb);
> 4819 tail = rps_input_queue_tail_incr(sd);
4820 backlog_unlock_irq_restore(sd, &flags);
4821
4822 /* save the tail outside of the critical section */
> 4823 rps_input_queue_tail_save(qtail, tail);
4824 return NET_RX_SUCCESS;
4825 }
4826
4827 backlog_unlock_irq_restore(sd, &flags);
4828
4829 cpu_backlog_drop:
4830 atomic_inc(&sd->dropped);
4831 bad_dev:
4832 dev_core_stats_rx_dropped_inc(skb->dev);
4833 kfree_skb_reason(skb, reason);
4834 return NET_RX_DROP;
4835 }
4836
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-29 12:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20240328170309.2172584-7-edumazet@google.com>
2024-03-29 12:07 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2024-03-29 12:29 ` [PATCH net-next 6/8] net: rps: change input_queue_tail_incr_save() kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202403291901.lqImStGD-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).