From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Maxwell Bland <mbland@motorola.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
Maxwell Bland <mbland@motorola.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5 RESEND] arm64: dynamic enforcement of PXNTable
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:37:51 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202404171444.fqXW3YmG-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240416122254.868007168-5-mbland@motorola.com>
Hi Maxwell,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on 0bbac3facb5d6cc0171c45c9873a2dc96bea9680]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Maxwell-Bland/mm-allow-arch-refinement-skip-for-vmap-alloc/20240417-032149
base: 0bbac3facb5d6cc0171c45c9873a2dc96bea9680
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240416122254.868007168-5-mbland%40motorola.com
patch subject: [PATCH 4/5 RESEND] arm64: dynamic enforcement of PXNTable
config: arm64-allnoconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240417/202404171444.fqXW3YmG-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240417/202404171444.fqXW3YmG-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202404171444.fqXW3YmG-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
aarch64-linux-ld: Unexpected GOT/PLT entries detected!
aarch64-linux-ld: Unexpected run-time procedure linkages detected!
aarch64-linux-ld: arch/arm64/kernel/setup.o: in function `setup_arch':
setup.c:(.init.text+0x694): undefined reference to `module_init_limits'
aarch64-linux-ld: mm/memory.o: in function `__pte_alloc_kernel':
>> memory.c:(.text+0x2b64): undefined reference to `module_plt_base'
aarch64-linux-ld: mm/memory.o: relocation R_AARCH64_ADR_PREL_PG_HI21 against symbol `module_plt_base' which may bind externally can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
memory.c:(.text+0x2b64): dangerous relocation: unsupported relocation
>> aarch64-linux-ld: memory.c:(.text+0x2b6c): undefined reference to `module_plt_base'
>> aarch64-linux-ld: memory.c:(.text+0x2b74): undefined reference to `module_direct_base'
aarch64-linux-ld: mm/memory.o: relocation R_AARCH64_ADR_PREL_PG_HI21 against symbol `module_direct_base' which may bind externally can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
memory.c:(.text+0x2b74): dangerous relocation: unsupported relocation
aarch64-linux-ld: memory.c:(.text+0x2b78): undefined reference to `module_direct_base'
aarch64-linux-ld: mm/sparse-vmemmap.o: in function `vmemmap_pmd_populate':
>> sparse-vmemmap.c:(.meminit.text+0x450): undefined reference to `module_plt_base'
aarch64-linux-ld: mm/sparse-vmemmap.o: relocation R_AARCH64_ADR_PREL_PG_HI21 against symbol `module_plt_base' which may bind externally can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
sparse-vmemmap.c:(.meminit.text+0x450): dangerous relocation: unsupported relocation
>> aarch64-linux-ld: sparse-vmemmap.c:(.meminit.text+0x458): undefined reference to `module_plt_base'
>> aarch64-linux-ld: sparse-vmemmap.c:(.meminit.text+0x460): undefined reference to `module_direct_base'
aarch64-linux-ld: mm/sparse-vmemmap.o: relocation R_AARCH64_ADR_PREL_PG_HI21 against symbol `module_direct_base' which may bind externally can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC
sparse-vmemmap.c:(.meminit.text+0x460): dangerous relocation: unsupported relocation
aarch64-linux-ld: sparse-vmemmap.c:(.meminit.text+0x464): undefined reference to `module_direct_base'
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-17 6:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
[parent not found: <20240416122254.868007168-5-mbland@motorola.com>]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202404171444.fqXW3YmG-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mbland@motorola.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).