From: Philip Li <philip.li@intel.com>
To: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
<oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: kernel/bpf/helpers.c:1905:19: warning: no previous declaration for 'bpf_percpu_obj_new_impl'
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2023 00:19:40 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZUPMHE482aEfpUvZ@rli9-mobl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4eb1d4cd-c327-4514-b709-b98dc9e6af3b@linux.dev>
On Thu, Nov 02, 2023 at 08:36:16AM -0700, Yonghong Song wrote:
>
> On 11/2/23 2:06 AM, Philip Li wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 02, 2023 at 04:42:39PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> > > Hi Yonghong,
> > Sorry, kindly ignore this report, it is similar one as https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309241550.JnHcYTZh-lkp@intel.com/,
> > and we haven't fixed the bot side yet.
>
> The fix is just pushed to the bpf tree.
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231031215625.2343848-1-davemarchevsky@fb.com/
Got it, thanks for the info.
BTW: I found a few places in kernel only handle -Wmissing-prototypes but not
-Wmissing-declarations when using __diag_ignore_all. Initially the bot only
run with -Wno-missing-prototypes for old compiler, which leads to -Wmissing-declarations
warnings still being reported.
What the bot does now is run with both -Wno-missing-prototypes and -Wno-missing-declarations
now for gcc older than gcc-8.
>
>
> >
> > > FYI, the error/warning still remains.
> > >
> > > tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
> > > head: 21e80f3841c01aeaf32d7aee7bbc87b3db1aa0c6
> > > commit: 36d8bdf75a93190e5669b9d1d95994e13e15ba1d bpf: Add alloc/xchg/direct_access support for local percpu kptr
> > > date: 8 weeks ago
> > > config: x86_64-buildonly-randconfig-006-20231102 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231102/202311021613.I5dZri9c-lkp@intel.com/config)
> > > compiler: gcc-7 (Ubuntu 7.5.0-6ubuntu2) 7.5.0
> > > reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231102/202311021613.I5dZri9c-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
> > >
> > > If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
> > > the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
> > > | Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
> > > | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202311021613.I5dZri9c-lkp@intel.com/
> > >
> > > All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
> > >
> > > kernel/bpf/helpers.c:1891:19: warning: no previous declaration for 'bpf_obj_new_impl' [-Wmissing-declarations]
> > > __bpf_kfunc void *bpf_obj_new_impl(u64 local_type_id__k, void *meta__ign)
> > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > > > kernel/bpf/helpers.c:1905:19: warning: no previous declaration for 'bpf_percpu_obj_new_impl' [-Wmissing-declarations]
> > > __bpf_kfunc void *bpf_percpu_obj_new_impl(u64 local_type_id__k, void *meta__ign)
> > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > kernel/bpf/helpers.c:1933:18: warning: no previous declaration for 'bpf_obj_drop_impl' [-Wmissing-declarations]
> > > __bpf_kfunc void bpf_obj_drop_impl(void *p__alloc, void *meta__ign)
> > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > > > kernel/bpf/helpers.c:1941:18: warning: no previous declaration for 'bpf_percpu_obj_drop_impl' [-Wmissing-declarations]
> > > __bpf_kfunc void bpf_percpu_obj_drop_impl(void *p__alloc, void *meta__ign)
> > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > kernel/bpf/helpers.c:1947:19: warning: no previous declaration for 'bpf_refcount_acquire_impl' [-Wmissing-declarations]
> > > __bpf_kfunc void *bpf_refcount_acquire_impl(void *p__refcounted_kptr, void *meta__ign)
> > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > kernel/bpf/helpers.c:1992:17: warning: no previous declaration for 'bpf_list_push_front_impl' [-Wmissing-declarations]
> > > __bpf_kfunc int bpf_list_push_front_impl(struct bpf_list_head *head,
> > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2002:17: warning: no previous declaration for 'bpf_list_push_back_impl' [-Wmissing-declarations]
> > > __bpf_kfunc int bpf_list_push_back_impl(struct bpf_list_head *head,
> > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2035:35: warning: no previous declaration for 'bpf_list_pop_front' [-Wmissing-declarations]
> > > __bpf_kfunc struct bpf_list_node *bpf_list_pop_front(struct bpf_list_head *head)
> > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2040:35: warning: no previous declaration for 'bpf_list_pop_back' [-Wmissing-declarations]
> > > __bpf_kfunc struct bpf_list_node *bpf_list_pop_back(struct bpf_list_head *head)
> > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2045:33: warning: no previous declaration for 'bpf_rbtree_remove' [-Wmissing-declarations]
> > > __bpf_kfunc struct bpf_rb_node *bpf_rbtree_remove(struct bpf_rb_root *root,
> > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2101:17: warning: no previous declaration for 'bpf_rbtree_add_impl' [-Wmissing-declarations]
> > > __bpf_kfunc int bpf_rbtree_add_impl(struct bpf_rb_root *root, struct bpf_rb_node *node,
> > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2111:33: warning: no previous declaration for 'bpf_rbtree_first' [-Wmissing-declarations]
> > > __bpf_kfunc struct bpf_rb_node *bpf_rbtree_first(struct bpf_rb_root *root)
> > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2124:33: warning: no previous declaration for 'bpf_task_acquire' [-Wmissing-declarations]
> > > __bpf_kfunc struct task_struct *bpf_task_acquire(struct task_struct *p)
> > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2135:18: warning: no previous declaration for 'bpf_task_release' [-Wmissing-declarations]
> > > __bpf_kfunc void bpf_task_release(struct task_struct *p)
> > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2224:33: warning: no previous declaration for 'bpf_task_from_pid' [-Wmissing-declarations]
> > > __bpf_kfunc struct task_struct *bpf_task_from_pid(s32 pid)
> > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2265:19: warning: no previous declaration for 'bpf_dynptr_slice' [-Wmissing-declarations]
> > > __bpf_kfunc void *bpf_dynptr_slice(const struct bpf_dynptr_kern *ptr, u32 offset,
> > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2349:19: warning: no previous declaration for 'bpf_dynptr_slice_rdwr' [-Wmissing-declarations]
> > > __bpf_kfunc void *bpf_dynptr_slice_rdwr(const struct bpf_dynptr_kern *ptr, u32 offset,
> > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2380:17: warning: no previous declaration for 'bpf_dynptr_adjust' [-Wmissing-declarations]
> > > __bpf_kfunc int bpf_dynptr_adjust(struct bpf_dynptr_kern *ptr, u32 start, u32 end)
> > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2398:18: warning: no previous declaration for 'bpf_dynptr_is_null' [-Wmissing-declarations]
> > > __bpf_kfunc bool bpf_dynptr_is_null(struct bpf_dynptr_kern *ptr)
> > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2403:18: warning: no previous declaration for 'bpf_dynptr_is_rdonly' [-Wmissing-declarations]
> > > __bpf_kfunc bool bpf_dynptr_is_rdonly(struct bpf_dynptr_kern *ptr)
> > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2411:19: warning: no previous declaration for 'bpf_dynptr_size' [-Wmissing-declarations]
> > > __bpf_kfunc __u32 bpf_dynptr_size(const struct bpf_dynptr_kern *ptr)
> > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2419:17: warning: no previous declaration for 'bpf_dynptr_clone' [-Wmissing-declarations]
> > > __bpf_kfunc int bpf_dynptr_clone(struct bpf_dynptr_kern *ptr,
> > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2432:19: warning: no previous declaration for 'bpf_cast_to_kern_ctx' [-Wmissing-declarations]
> > > __bpf_kfunc void *bpf_cast_to_kern_ctx(void *obj)
> > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2437:19: warning: no previous declaration for 'bpf_rdonly_cast' [-Wmissing-declarations]
> > > __bpf_kfunc void *bpf_rdonly_cast(void *obj__ign, u32 btf_id__k)
> > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2442:18: warning: no previous declaration for 'bpf_rcu_read_lock' [-Wmissing-declarations]
> > > __bpf_kfunc void bpf_rcu_read_lock(void)
> > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > kernel/bpf/helpers.c:2447:18: warning: no previous declaration for 'bpf_rcu_read_unlock' [-Wmissing-declarations]
> > > __bpf_kfunc void bpf_rcu_read_unlock(void)
> > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > >
> > >
> > > vim +/bpf_percpu_obj_new_impl +1905 kernel/bpf/helpers.c
> > >
> > > 1904
> > > > 1905 __bpf_kfunc void *bpf_percpu_obj_new_impl(u64 local_type_id__k, void *meta__ign)
> > > 1906 {
> > > 1907 u64 size = local_type_id__k;
> > > 1908
> > > 1909 /* The verifier has ensured that meta__ign must be NULL */
> > > 1910 return bpf_mem_alloc(&bpf_global_percpu_ma, size);
> > > 1911 }
> > > 1912
> > > 1913 /* Must be called under migrate_disable(), as required by bpf_mem_free */
> > > 1914 void __bpf_obj_drop_impl(void *p, const struct btf_record *rec)
> > > 1915 {
> > > 1916 if (rec && rec->refcount_off >= 0 &&
> > > 1917 !refcount_dec_and_test((refcount_t *)(p + rec->refcount_off))) {
> > > 1918 /* Object is refcounted and refcount_dec didn't result in 0
> > > 1919 * refcount. Return without freeing the object
> > > 1920 */
> > > 1921 return;
> > > 1922 }
> > > 1923
> > > 1924 if (rec)
> > > 1925 bpf_obj_free_fields(rec, p);
> > > 1926
> > > 1927 if (rec && rec->refcount_off >= 0)
> > > 1928 bpf_mem_free_rcu(&bpf_global_ma, p);
> > > 1929 else
> > > 1930 bpf_mem_free(&bpf_global_ma, p);
> > > 1931 }
> > > 1932
> > > 1933 __bpf_kfunc void bpf_obj_drop_impl(void *p__alloc, void *meta__ign)
> > > 1934 {
> > > 1935 struct btf_struct_meta *meta = meta__ign;
> > > 1936 void *p = p__alloc;
> > > 1937
> > > 1938 __bpf_obj_drop_impl(p, meta ? meta->record : NULL);
> > > 1939 }
> > > 1940
> > > > 1941 __bpf_kfunc void bpf_percpu_obj_drop_impl(void *p__alloc, void *meta__ign)
> > > 1942 {
> > > 1943 /* The verifier has ensured that meta__ign must be NULL */
> > > 1944 bpf_mem_free_rcu(&bpf_global_percpu_ma, p__alloc);
> > > 1945 }
> > > 1946
> > >
> > > --
> > > 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
> > > https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
> > >
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-02 16:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-02 8:42 kernel/bpf/helpers.c:1905:19: warning: no previous declaration for 'bpf_percpu_obj_new_impl' kernel test robot
2023-11-02 9:06 ` Philip Li
2023-11-02 15:36 ` Yonghong Song
2023-11-02 16:19 ` Philip Li [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZUPMHE482aEfpUvZ@rli9-mobl \
--to=philip.li@intel.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).